Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) — Vulnerability Class 2041

2041 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-639 represents an authorization bypass weakness where systems fail to validate that a user is permitted to access a resource identified by a user-controlled key. Attackers typically exploit this by manipulating identifiers, such as changing a numeric user ID in a URL or API parameter, to retrieve or modify another user’s private data. This insecure direct object reference allows unauthorized access without requiring authentication bypasses. Developers prevent this vulnerability by implementing robust server-side authorization checks that verify the requesting user’s permissions against the requested resource, rather than trusting client-supplied identifiers. Additionally, using indirect references or opaque tokens instead of predictable, sequential keys can mitigate the risk of enumeration and unauthorized access attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
The system's authorization functionality does not prevent one user from gaining access to another user's data or record by modifying the key value identifying the data. Retrieval of a user record occurs in the system based on some key value that is under user control. The key would typically identify a user-related record stored in the system and would be used to lookup that record for presentation to the user. It is likely that an attacker would have to be an authenticated user in the system. However, the authorization process would not properly check the data access operation to ensure that the authenticated user performing the operation has sufficient entitlements to perform the requested data access, hence bypassing any other authorization checks present in the system. For example, attackers can look at places where user specific data is retrieved (e.g. search screens) and determine whether the key for the item being looked up is controllable externally. The key may be a hidden field in the HTML form field, might be passed as a URL parameter or as an unencrypted cookie variable, then in each of these cases it will be possible to tamper with the key value. One manifestation of this weakness is when a system uses sequential or otherwise easily-guessable session IDs that would allow one user to easily switch to another user's session and read/modify their data.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
Access control checks for specific user data or functionality can be bypassed.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Horizontal escalation of privilege is possible (one user can view/modify information of another user).
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Vertical escalation of privilege is possible if the user-controlled key is actually a flag that indicates administrator status, allowing the attacker to gain administrative access.
Mitigations (3)
Architecture and Design For each and every data access, ensure that the user has sufficient privilege to access the record that is being requested.
Architecture and Design, Implementation Make sure that the key that is used in the lookup of a specific user's record is not controllable externally by the user or that any tampering can be detected.
Architecture and Design Use encryption in order to make it more difficult to guess other legitimate values of the key or associate a digital signature with the key so that the server can verify that there has been no tampering.
Examples (1)
The following code uses a parameterized statement, which escapes metacharacters and prevents SQL injection vulnerabilities, to construct and execute a SQL query that searches for an invoice matching the specified identifier [1]. The identifier is selected from a list of all invoices associated with the current authenticated user.
... conn = new SqlConnection(_ConnectionString); conn.Open(); int16 id = System.Convert.ToInt16(invoiceID.Text); SqlCommand query = new SqlCommand( "SELECT * FROM invoices WHERE id = @id", conn); query.Parameters.AddWithValue("@id", id); SqlDataReader objReader = objCommand.ExecuteReader(); ...
Bad · C#
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-33663 n8n Vulnerable to Credential Theft via Name-Based Resolution and Permission Checker Bypass in Community Edition — n8n 6.5 - 2026-03-25
CVE-2026-2414 HYPR Server 安全漏洞 — Server 8.8 - 2026-03-25
CVE-2026-32535 WordPress JS Help Desk plugin <= 3.0.3 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — JS Help Desk 6.5 Medium 2026-03-25
CVE-2026-32533 WordPress LatePoint plugin <= 5.2.6 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — LatePoint 6.5 Medium 2026-03-25
CVE-2025-69347 WordPress WPSubscription plugin <= 1.8.10 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — WPSubscription 8.6 High 2026-03-25
CVE-2026-33345 solidtime vulnerable to IDOR in private projects — solidtime 6.5 Medium 2026-03-24
CVE-2026-33511 pyload-ng: Authentication Bypass via Host Header Injection in ClickNLoad — pyload 8.2 - 2026-03-24
CVE-2026-33160 Craft CMS: Anonymous "generate transform" calls for assets can expose private assets via transform URL — cms 5.3 - 2026-03-24
CVE-2026-33158 Craft CMS: Low-privilege users could read private asset contents when editing an asset (IDOR) — cms 4.3 - 2026-03-24
CVE-2026-33700 Vikunja has a Link Share Delete IDOR — Missing Project Ownership Check Allows Cross-Project Link Share Deletion — vikunja 2.7 - 2026-03-24
CVE-2026-33678 Vikunja has IDOR in Task Attachment ReadOne Allows Cross-Project File Access and Deletion — vikunja 8.1 High 2026-03-24
CVE-2026-33313 Vikunja has an IDOR in Task Comments Allows Reading Arbitrary Comments — vikunja 4.3 - 2026-03-24
CVE-2026-23488 Blinko: multiple interfaces in the comment feature allow unauthorized access — blinko 5.3 - 2026-03-23
CVE-2026-23487 Blinko: IDOR - user.detail Endpoint Leaks Superadmin Token — blinko 8.1 - 2026-03-23
CVE-2026-30886 New API: IDOR in VideoProxy allows cross-user video content access via missing ownership check — new-api 6.5 Medium 2026-03-23
CVE-2026-33297 AVideo has an IDOR - Any Admin Can Set Another User's Channel Password via setPassword.json.php — AVideo 9.1 - 2026-03-23
CVE-2026-4563 MacCMS Member Order Detail User.php order_info authorization — MacCMS 4.3 Medium 2026-03-22
CVE-2026-4549 mickasmt next-saas-stripe-starter Stripe API open-customer-portal.ts openCustomerPortal authorization — next-saas-stripe-starter 3.1 Low 2026-03-22
CVE-2026-33053 Langflow has Missing Ownership Verification in API Key Deletion (IDOR) — langflow 8.2 - 2026-03-20
CVE-2026-32114 Discourse's unscoped status lookups leak restricted metadata — discourse 4.3 - 2026-03-20
CVE-2026-32697 SuiteCRM: RecordHandler::getRecord() missing ACLAccess('view') check allows any authenticated user to read any record (IDOR) — SuiteCRM-Core 6.5 Medium 2026-03-19
CVE-2026-29189 SuiteCRM has a REST API V8 IDOR: Missing ACL Checks on User Preferences and Relationship Endpoints — SuiteCRM 8.1 High 2026-03-19
CVE-2026-32039 OpenClaw < 2026.2.22 - Sender Authorization Bypass via Identity Collision in toolsBySender — OpenClaw 5.9 Medium 2026-03-19
CVE-2026-33304 OpenEMR has Authorization Bypass in Dated Reminders Log — openemr 6.5 Medium 2026-03-19
CVE-2026-25744 OpenEMR: POST /api/.../vital Accepts Attacker-Supplied id and Overwrites Arbitrary Vitals — openemr 6.5 Medium 2026-03-19
CVE-2026-32867 OPEXUS eComplaint unauthenticated file upload — eComplaint 5.4 Medium 2026-03-19
CVE-2025-32223 WordPress Tutor LMS plugin <= 3.9.4 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — Tutor LMS 6.5 Medium 2026-03-19
CVE-2026-27397 WordPress Really Simple Security Pro plugin <= 9.5.4.0 - Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability — Really Simple Security Pro 6.5 Medium 2026-03-19
CVE-2026-32638 StudioCMS REST getUsers Exposes Owner Account Records to Admin Tokens — studiocms 2.7 Low 2026-03-18
CVE-2026-25745 OpenEMR's Message Update Ignores Patient id — openemr 6.5 Medium 2026-03-18

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-639 (通过用户控制密钥绕过授权机制) represent 2041 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.