Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1471

1471 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Implementation If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Operation Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System Configuration Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2023-0640 TRENDnet TEW-652BRP Web Interface ping.ccp command injection — TEW-652BRP 7.2 High 2023-02-02
CVE-2023-0638 TRENDnet TEW-811DRU Web Interface command injection — TEW-811DRU 7.2 High 2023-02-02
CVE-2023-22657 F5OS vulnerability — F5OS-A 7.0 High 2023-02-01
CVE-2023-0611 TRENDnet TEW-652BRP Web Management Interface get_set.ccp command injection — TEW-652BRP 8.8 High 2023-02-01
CVE-2022-45095 Dell PowerScale OneFS 命令注入漏洞 — PowerScale OneFS 6.7 Medium 2023-02-01
CVE-2021-41231 OpenMage LTS DataFlow upload remote code execution vulnerability — magento-lts 7.2 High 2023-01-27
CVE-2021-41144 OpenMage LTS authenticated remote code execution through layout update — magento-lts 8.8 High 2023-01-27
CVE-2021-41143 OpenMage LTS arbitrary file deletion in customer media allows for remote code execution — magento-lts 7.2 High 2023-01-27
CVE-2021-39217 OpenMage LTS arbitrary command execution in custom layout update through blocks — magento-lts 7.2 High 2023-01-27
CVE-2023-22884 Apache Airflow, Apache Airflow MySQL Provider: Arbitrary file read via MySQL provider in Apache Airflow — Apache Airflow 9.8 - 2023-01-21
CVE-2023-20045 Cisco RV160和RV260 输入验证错误漏洞 — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 4.9 Medium 2023-01-19
CVE-2023-20026 Cisco Small Business RV016 输入验证错误漏洞 — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 6.5 Medium 2023-01-19
CVE-2023-0315 Command Injection in froxlor/froxlor — froxlor/froxlor 8.8 - 2023-01-16
CVE-2022-4616 Delta Electronics DX-3021 命令注入漏洞 — 4G Router DX-3021 7.2 High 2023-01-12
CVE-2020-36650 IonicaBizau node-gry command injection — node-gry 5.5 Medium 2023-01-11
CVE-2022-45094 Siemens SINEC NMS 命令注入漏洞 — SINEC INS 8.4 High 2023-01-10
CVE-2020-36642 trampgeek jobe LanguageTask.php run_in_sandbox command injection — jobe 5.5 Medium 2023-01-06
CVE-2021-4304 eprintsug ulcc-core toolbox command injection — ulcc-core 6.3 Medium 2023-01-05
CVE-2022-39081 UNISOC chipset 安全漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 6.7 - 2023-01-04
CVE-2022-39082 UNISOC chipset 安全漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 6.7 - 2023-01-04
CVE-2022-39083 UNISOC chipset 安全漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 6.7 - 2023-01-04
CVE-2022-39084 UNISOC chipset 安全漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 6.7 - 2023-01-04
CVE-2022-39085 UNISOC chipset 安全漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 6.7 - 2023-01-04
CVE-2022-39086 UNISOC chipset 安全漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 6.7 - 2023-01-04
CVE-2022-39087 UNISOC chipset 安全漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 6.7 - 2023-01-04
CVE-2022-39088 UNISOC chipset 安全漏洞 — SC9863A/SC9832E/SC7731E/T610/T310/T606/T760/T610/T618/T606/T612/T616/T760/T770/T820/S8000 6.7 - 2023-01-04
CVE-2017-20156 Exciting Printer Argument prepare_page.rb command injection — Printer 5.5 Medium 2022-12-31
CVE-2021-32692 Activity Watch vulnerable to command execution on macOS via printAppTitle.scpt — Activity Watch 9.6 Critical 2022-12-23
CVE-2022-46421 Apache Airflow Hive Provider: Hive Provider RCE vulnerability with hive_cli_params — Apache Airflow Hive Provider 9.8 - 2022-12-20
CVE-2022-45796 SHARP Multifunction Printer - Command Injection — SHARP multifunction printers 9.1 Critical 2022-12-16

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1471 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.