Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1471

1471 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Implementation If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Operation Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System Configuration Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2022-26085 InHand Networks InRouter Series 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — InRouter302 8.8 - 2022-05-12
CVE-2022-26042 InHand Networks InRouter Series 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — InRouter302 8.8 - 2022-05-12
CVE-2022-26007 InHand Networks InRouter302操作系统命令注入漏洞 — InRouter302 7.2 - 2022-05-12
CVE-2022-27588 Vulnerability in QVR — QVR 9.8 Critical 2022-05-05
CVE-2021-44051 Command injection — QuTScloud 8.8 High 2022-05-05
CVE-2022-27806 F5 BIG-IP多款产品命令注入漏洞 — BIG-IP (Advanced WAF, APM, ASM) 8.7 High 2022-05-05
CVE-2022-26415 F5 BIG-IP 命令注入漏洞 — BIG-IP 7.7 High 2022-05-05
CVE-2022-20799 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 4.7 Medium 2022-05-04
CVE-2022-20801 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 4.7 Medium 2022-05-04
CVE-2022-1509 Command Injection Vulnerability in hestiacp/hestiacp — hestiacp/hestiacp 9.9 Critical 2022-04-28
CVE-2021-34592 Bender Charge Controller: Command injection via Web interface — CC612 8.8 High 2022-04-27
CVE-2022-0999 mySCADA myPRO Command Injection — myPRO 8.8 High 2022-04-11
CVE-2022-20665 Cisco StarOS Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco ASR 5000 Series Software 6.0 Medium 2022-04-06
CVE-2021-32933 MDT AutoSave Command Injection — MDT AutoSave 10.0 Critical 2022-04-01
CVE-2022-25619 Authenticated Command Injection to RCE — SambaBox 3.8 Low 2022-03-30
CVE-2022-22688 Synology DiskStation Manager命令注入漏洞 — DiskStation Manager (DSM) 8.8 High 2022-03-25
CVE-2021-4045 TP-LINK Tapo C200 remote code execution vulnerability — Tapo C200 9.8 Critical 2022-03-07
CVE-2021-41599 Improper control flow in GitHub Enterprise Server hosted Pages leads to remote code execution — GitHub Enterprise Server 8.8 - 2022-02-17
CVE-2021-43589 DELL Dell EMC Unity 操作系统操作系统命令注入漏洞 — Unity 6.0 Medium 2022-01-24
CVE-2021-38542 Apache James vulnerable to STARTTLS command injection (IMAP and POP3) — Apache James 5.9 - 2022-01-04
CVE-2021-3621 SSSD 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — sssd 8.8 - 2021-12-23
CVE-2021-27447 Mesa Labs AmegaView command injection — AmegaView 10.0 Critical 2021-12-21
CVE-2021-27449 Mesa Labs AmegaView Command Injection — AmegaView 9.9 Critical 2021-12-21
CVE-2021-42132 Ivanti Avalanche 命令注入漏洞 — Ivanti Avalanche 8.8 - 2021-12-07
CVE-2021-42129 Ivanti Avalanche 命令注入漏洞 — Ivanti Avalanche 8.8 - 2021-12-07
CVE-2021-41146 Arbitrary command execution on Windows in qutebrowser — qutebrowser 8.8 High 2021-10-21
CVE-2021-31358 Junos OS Evolved: shell-injection vulnerabilities in evo_sftp UI wrapper script — Junos OS Evolved 7.8 High 2021-10-19
CVE-2021-31357 Junos OS Evolved: shell-injection vulnerabilities in evo_tcpdump UI wrapper script — Junos OS Evolved 7.8 High 2021-10-19
CVE-2021-31356 Junos OS Evolved: Multiple shell-injection vulnerabilities in EVO UI wrapper scripts — Junos OS Evolved 7.8 High 2021-10-19
CVE-2021-34748 Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Intersight Virtual Appliance 8.8 High 2021-10-06

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1471 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.