Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1471

1471 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-77 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious payloads, such as semicolons or pipe operators, into user-supplied fields to alter the intended command structure. This allows them to execute arbitrary system commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or denial of service. To prevent such vulnerabilities, developers must strictly validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected data formats are processed. Utilizing parameterized APIs or safe command execution libraries instead of direct string concatenation significantly reduces risk. Additionally, implementing the principle of least privilege for application processes limits the potential impact of successful injection attempts, thereby enhancing overall system security against command injection attacks.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended command when it is sent to a downstream component. Many protocols and products have their own custom command language. While OS or shell command strings are frequently discovered and targeted, developers may not realize that these other command languages might also be vulnerable to attacks.
Common Consequences (1)
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
If a malicious user injects a character (such as a semi-colon) that delimits the end of one command and the beginning of another, it may be possible to then insert an entirely new and unrelated command that was not intended to be executed. This gives an attacker a privilege or capability that they w…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Implementation If possible, ensure that all external commands called from the program are statically created.
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Operation Run time: Run time policy enforcement may be used in an allowlist fashion to prevent use of any non-sanctioned commands.
System Configuration Assign permissions that prevent the user from accessing/opening privileged files.
Examples (2)
Consider a "CWE Differentiator" application that uses an an LLM generative AI based "chatbot" to explain the difference between two weaknesses. As input, it accepts two CWE IDs, constructs a prompt string, sends the prompt to the chatbot, and prints the results. The prompt string effectively acts as a command to the chatbot component. Assume that invokeChatbot() calls the chatbot and returns the …
prompt = "Explain the difference between {} and {}".format(arg1, arg2) result = invokeChatbot(prompt) resultHTML = encodeForHTML(result) print resultHTML
Bad · Python
Explain the difference between CWE-77 and CWE-78
Informative
Consider the following program. It intends to perform an "ls -l" on an input filename. The validate_name() subroutine performs validation on the input to make sure that only alphanumeric and "-" characters are allowed, which avoids path traversal (CWE-22) and OS command injection (CWE-78) weaknesses. Only filenames like "abc" or "d-e-f" are intended to be allowed.
my $arg = GetArgument("filename"); do_listing($arg); sub do_listing { my($fname) = @_; if (! validate_name($fname)) { print "Error: name is not well-formed!\n"; return; } # build command my $cmd = "/bin/ls -l $fname"; system($cmd); } sub validate_name { my($name) = @_; if ($name =~ /^[\w\-]+$/) { return(1); } else { return(0); } }
Bad · Perl
if ($name =~ /^\w[\w\-]+$/) ...
Good · Perl
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2020-8188 Ubiquiti UniFi Protect 命令注入漏洞 — Protect for UniFi Cloud Key Gen2 Plus, UniFi Dream Machine Pro, UNVR 8.8 - 2020-07-02
CVE-2020-4059 Command Injection in mversion — mversion 7.3 High 2020-06-18
CVE-2020-3276 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 7.2 - 2020-06-18
CVE-2020-3275 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 7.2 - 2020-06-18
CVE-2020-3274 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 7.2 - 2020-06-18
CVE-2020-3279 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 7.2 - 2020-06-18
CVE-2020-3278 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 7.2 - 2020-06-18
CVE-2020-3277 Cisco Small Business RV Series Routers Command Injection Vulnerabilities — Cisco Small Business RV Series Router Firmware 7.2 - 2020-06-18
CVE-2020-5299 Potential CSV Injection vector in OctoberCMS — october 4.0 Medium 2020-06-03
CVE-2020-3224 Cisco IOS XE Software Web UI Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 16.11.1 8.8 - 2020-06-03
CVE-2020-3219 Cisco IOS XE Software Web UI Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 16.1.1 8.8 - 2020-06-03
CVE-2020-3212 Cisco IOS XE Software Web UI Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 16.11.1 8.8 - 2020-06-03
CVE-2020-3211 Cisco IOS XE Software Web UI Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 16.10.1 7.2 - 2020-06-03
CVE-2020-3210 Cisco IOS Software for Cisco Industrial Routers Virtual Device Server CLI Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS 12.2(60)EZ16 6.7 - 2020-06-03
CVE-2020-3207 Cisco IOS XE Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE Software 16.9.2 6.7 - 2020-06-03
CVE-2020-8171 Ubiquiti Networks AirOS 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — AirMax AirOS for TI, XW and XM boards 9.8 - 2020-05-26
CVE-2020-11073 Remote Code Execution in Autoswitch Python Virtualenv — zsh-autoswitch-virtualenv 7.9 High 2020-05-13
CVE-2019-5623 Accellion File Transfer Appliance Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') — File Transfer Appliance 9.8 - 2020-04-29
CVE-2019-16011 Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XE SD-WAN Software 7.8 - 2020-04-29
CVE-2019-17101 Command execution due to unsanitized input in Netatmo Smart Indoor Security Camera — Smart Indoor Camera 5.7 Medium 2020-04-23
CVE-2019-14868 ksh 命令注入漏洞 — ksh 7.4 High 2020-04-02
CVE-2019-16012 Cisco SD-WAN Solution vManage SQL Injection Vulnerability — Cisco vManage Software 8.1 - 2020-03-19
CVE-2020-3266 Cisco SD-WAN Solution Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco SD-WAN Solution 7.8 - 2020-03-19
CVE-2020-1980 PAN-OS: Shell injection vulnerability in PAN-OS CLI allows execution of shell commands — PAN-OS 7.8 High 2020-03-11
CVE-2020-3176 Cisco Remote PHY Device Software Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Remote PHY 6.7 - 2020-03-04
CVE-2019-15609 kill-port-process package 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — kill-port-process 9.8 - 2020-02-28
CVE-2019-16005 Cisco Webex Video Mesh Node Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Webex Video Mesh 7.2 - 2020-01-26
CVE-2019-12629 Cisco SD-WAN vManage Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco SD-WAN Solution 8.8 - 2020-01-26
CVE-2019-17148 Corel Parallels Desktop 命令注入漏洞 — Desktop 7.8 - 2020-01-07
CVE-2019-15575 GitLab 注入漏洞 — GitLab CE/EE 9.8 - 2019-12-18

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-77 (在命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(命令注入)) represent 1471 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.