目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%

CWE-787 跨界内存写 类漏洞列表 3165

CWE-787 跨界内存写 类弱点 3165 条 CVE 漏洞汇总,含 AI 中文分析。

CWE-787 越界写入是一种严重的内存安全漏洞,指程序向缓冲区边界之外或起始位置之前写入数据。攻击者利用此缺陷可覆盖相邻内存,导致程序崩溃、数据损坏,甚至通过精心构造的 payload 实现任意代码执行,从而完全控制目标系统。开发者应避免此类风险,需严格实施边界检查,使用安全的内存管理函数,启用编译器防护机制,并遵循最小权限原则,确保所有内存访问均在合法范围内。

MITRE CWE 官方描述
CWE:CWE-787 Out-of-bounds Write 英文:The product writes data past the end, or before the beginning, of the intended buffer. 译文:产品将数据写入预期缓冲区(buffer)的末尾之外或起始位置之前。
常见影响 (3)
Integrity Modify Memory, Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Write operations could cause memory corruption. In some cases, an adversary can modify control data such as return addresses in order to execute unexpected code.
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart
Attempting to access out-of-range, invalid, or unauthorized memory could cause the product to crash.
Other Unexpected State
Subsequent write operations can produce undefined or unexpected results.
缓解措施 (5)
Requirements Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer. Be wary that a lan…
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
Operation, Build and Compilation Use automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are offered by certain compilers or compiler extensions. Examples include: the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice, which provide various mechanisms including canary-based detection and range/index checking. D3-SFCV (Stack Frame Canary Validation) from D3FEND [REF-1334] discusses…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
Implementation Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory: Double check that the buffer is as large as specified. When using functions that accept a number of bytes to copy, such as strncpy(), be aware that if the destination buffer size is equal to the source buffer size, it may not NULL-terminate the string. Check buffer boundaries if accessing the buffer in a…
Operation, Build and Compilation Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code. Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64]. Imported…
Effectiveness: Defense in Depth
代码示例 (2)
The following code attempts to save four different identification numbers into an array.
int id_sequence[3]; /* Populate the id array. */ id_sequence[0] = 123; id_sequence[1] = 234; id_sequence[2] = 345; id_sequence[3] = 456;
Bad · C
In the following code, it is possible to request that memcpy move a much larger segment of memory than assumed:
int returnChunkSize(void *) { /* if chunk info is valid, return the size of usable memory, * else, return -1 to indicate an error */ ... } int main() { ... memcpy(destBuf, srcBuf, (returnChunkSize(destBuf)-1)); ... }
Bad · C
CVE ID 标题 CVSS 风险等级 Published
CVE-2023-48629 Adobe Substance 3D Sampler 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Substance3D - Sampler 7.8 High 2023-12-13
CVE-2023-48626 Adobe Substance 3D Sampler 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Substance3D - Sampler 7.8 High 2023-12-13
CVE-2023-47063 Adobe Illustrator 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Illustrator 7.8 High 2023-12-13
CVE-2023-48695 Azure RTOS USBX 缓冲区错误漏洞 — usbx 7.2 High 2023-12-05
CVE-2023-48692 Azure RTOS NetX Duo 安全漏洞 — netxduo 9.1 Critical 2023-12-05
CVE-2023-48691 Azure RTOS NetX Duo 缓冲区错误漏洞 — netxduo 8.1 High 2023-12-05
CVE-2023-48316 Azure RTOS NetX Duo 安全漏洞 — netxduo 9.8 Critical 2023-12-05
CVE-2023-48315 Azure RTOS NetX Duo 安全漏洞 — netxduo 8.8 High 2023-12-05
CVE-2023-32804 ARM Mali GPU Kernel Driver 安全漏洞 — Midgard GPU Userspace Driver 7.8AI High AI 2023-12-04
CVE-2023-29075 Autodesk AutoCAD 安全漏洞 — AutoCAD, Advance Steel and Civil 3D 7.8 - 2023-11-23
CVE-2023-29074 Autodesk AutoCAD 安全漏洞 — AutoCAD, Advance Steel and Civil 3D 7.8 - 2023-11-23
CVE-2023-40152 Fuji Electric Tellus Lite V-Simulator 安全漏洞 — Tellus Lite V-Simulator 7.8 High 2023-11-22
CVE-2023-5593 Zyxel SecuExtender SSL VPN Client 安全漏洞 — SecuExtender SSL VPN Client 7.8 High 2023-11-20
CVE-2023-47070 Adobe After Effects 安全漏洞 — After Effects 7.8 High 2023-11-17
CVE-2023-47073 Adobe After Effects 安全漏洞 — After Effects 7.8 High 2023-11-17
CVE-2023-47057 Adobe Premiere Pro 安全漏洞 — Premiere Pro 7.8 High 2023-11-16
CVE-2023-47046 Adobe Audition 安全漏洞 — Audition 5.5 Medium 2023-11-16
CVE-2023-47041 Adobe Media Encoder 安全漏洞 — Media Encoder 7.8 High 2023-11-16
CVE-2023-44330 Adobe Photoshop 安全漏洞 — Photoshop Desktop 7.8 High 2023-11-16
CVE-2023-44366 Adobe Acrobat Reader 安全漏洞 — Acrobat Reader 7.8 High 2023-11-16
CVE-2023-46761 Huawei HarmonyOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — HarmonyOS 8.8 - 2023-11-08
CVE-2023-46760 Huawei HarmonyOS 缓冲区错误漏洞 — HarmonyOS 8.8 - 2023-11-08
CVE-2023-5941 FreeBSD 安全漏洞 — FreeBSD 9.8 - 2023-11-08
CVE-2023-4154 Samba 安全漏洞 — samba 7.5 High 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-44398 Exiv2 缓冲区错误漏洞 — exiv2 8.8 High 2023-11-06
CVE-2023-20213 Cisco Identity Services Engine 安全漏洞 — Cisco Identity Services Engine Software 4.3 Medium 2023-11-01
CVE-2023-39427 Ashlar Incorporated Ashlar-Vellum 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Cobalt 7.8 High 2023-10-26
CVE-2023-5367 xorg-x11-server 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Extended Lifecycle Support - EXTENSION 7.8 High 2023-10-25
CVE-2023-5717 Linux kernel 缓冲区错误漏洞 — Kernel 7.8 High 2023-10-25
CVE-2022-3699 Lenovo Diagnostics 缓冲区错误漏洞 — HardwareScanPlugin 7.8 High 2023-10-24

CWE-787(跨界内存写) 是常见的弱点类别,本平台收录该类弱点关联的 3165 条 CVE 漏洞。