Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)) — Vulnerability Class 4006

4006 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-78 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs operating system commands using untrusted external data without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this by injecting malicious shell metacharacters, such as semicolons or pipes, into user-supplied fields like form inputs or URL parameters. This manipulation allows the attacker to alter the intended command structure, enabling arbitrary code execution, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise. To mitigate this risk, developers must strictly avoid passing user input directly to OS command interpreters. Instead, they should utilize safe, language-specific APIs that do not invoke the shell, or implement rigorous input validation and parameterization techniques. By treating all external data as inherently untrusted and applying strict allow-list filtering, organizations can effectively neutralize special elements and prevent command injection vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an OS command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended OS command when it is sent to a downstream component. This weakness can lead to a vulnerability in environments in which the attacker does not have direct access to the operating system, such as in web applications. Alternately, if the weakness occurs in a privileged program, it could allow the attacker to specify commands that normally would not be accessible, or to call alternate commands with privileges that the attacker does not have. The problem is exacerbated if the compromised process does not follow the principle of least privilege, because the attacker-controlled commands may run with special system privileges that increases the amount of damage. There are at least two subtypes of OS command injection: The application intends to execute a single, fixed program that is under its own control. It intends to use externally-supplied inputs as arguments to that program. For example, the program might use system("nslookup [HOSTNAME]") to run nslookup and allow the user to supply a HOSTNAME, which is used as an argument. Attackers cannot prevent nslookup from executing. However, if the program does not remove command separators from the HOSTNAME argument, attackers could place the separators into the arguments, which allows them to execute their own program afte…
Common Consequences (1)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Non-Repudiation Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, Read Files or Directories, Modify Files or Directories, Read Application Data, Modify Application Data, Hide Activities
Attackers could execute unauthorized operating system commands, which could then be used to disable the product, or read and modify data for which the attacker does not have permissions to access directly. Since the targeted application is directly executing the commands instead of the attacker, any…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design If at all possible, use library calls rather than external processes to recreate the desired functionality.
Architecture and Design, Operation Run the code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which files can be accessed in a particular directory or which commands can be executed by the software. OS-level examples include the Unix chroot jail, AppArmor, and SELinux. In general, managed code may provide some protection. For ex…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any data that will be used to generate a command to be executed, keep as much of that data out of external control as possible. For example, in web applications, this may require storing the data locally in the session's state instead of sending it out to the client in a hidden form field.
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using the ESAPI Encoding control [REF-45] or a similar tool, library, or framework. These will help the programmer encode outputs in a manner less prone to error.
Examples (2)
This example code intends to take the name of a user and list the contents of that user's home directory. It is subject to the first variant of OS command injection.
$userName = $_POST["user"]; $command = 'ls -l /home/' . $userName; system($command);
Bad · PHP
;rm -rf /
Attack
The following simple program accepts a filename as a command line argument and displays the contents of the file back to the user. The program is installed setuid root because it is intended for use as a learning tool to allow system administrators in-training to inspect privileged system files without giving them the ability to modify them or damage the system.
int main(int argc, char** argv) { char cmd[CMD_MAX] = "/usr/bin/cat "; strcat(cmd, argv[1]); system(cmd); }
Bad · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2021-27256 Netgear NETGEAR R7800 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — R7800 8.8 - 2021-03-05
CVE-2021-21302 CSV Injection via csv export — PrestaShop 6.8 Medium 2021-02-26
CVE-2021-26724 Authenticated command injection when changing date settings or hostname in Guardian/CMC before 20.0.7.4 — Guardian 7.2 High 2021-02-22
CVE-2021-21315 Command Injection Vulnerability — systeminformation 7.1 High 2021-02-16
CVE-2020-27861 Netgear NETGEAR 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — Orbi 8.8 - 2021-02-11
CVE-2021-21016 Magento Commerce Unauthorized Data Modification Could Lead to Arbitrary Code Execution — Magento Commerce 9.1 - 2021-02-11
CVE-2021-21015 Magento Commerce Unauthorized Data Modification Could Lead to Arbitrary Code Execution — Magento Commerce 9.1 - 2021-02-11
CVE-2021-21018 Magnto Commerce Unauthorized Data Modification Could Lead To Arbitrary Code Execution — Magento Commerce 9.1 - 2021-02-11
CVE-2021-1370 Cisco IOS XR Software for Cisco 8000 Series Routers and Network Convergence System 540 Series Routers Privilege Escalation Vulnerability — Cisco IOS XR Software 7.8 - 2021-02-04
CVE-2021-21289 Command Injection Vulnerability in Mechanize — mechanize 7.4 High 2021-02-02
CVE-2020-12513 Pepper+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master OS Command Injection — Comtrol IO-Link Master 7.5 High 2021-01-22
CVE-2021-1264 Cisco DNA Center Command Runner Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco Digital Network Architecture Center (DNA Center) 9.6 Critical 2021-01-20
CVE-2020-27298 Philips Interventional Workstations OS Command Injection — Interventional Workspot 6.5 Medium 2021-01-20
CVE-2021-0219 Junos OS: Command injection vulnerability in 'request system software' CLI command — Junos OS 6.7 Medium 2021-01-15
CVE-2021-0218 Junos OS: Command injection vulnerability in license-check daemon — Junos OS 7.8 High 2021-01-15
CVE-2020-5146 Sonicwall SMA100 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — SMA100 7.2 - 2021-01-09
CVE-2020-26294 Exposure of server configuration — compiler 7.4 High 2021-01-04
CVE-2020-35851 HGiga MailSherlock - Command Injection — MailSherlock MSR45/SSR45 8.1 High 2020-12-31
CVE-2020-26284 Hugo can execute a binary from the current directory on Windows — hugo 7.7 High 2020-12-21
CVE-2020-12522 Command Injection Vulnerability in I/O-Check Service of WAGO PFC100, PFC200 and Touch Panel 600 Series with firmware versions <=FW10 — Series PFC 100 (750-81xx/xxx-xxx) 10.0 Critical 2020-12-17
CVE-2020-26274 Command Injection Vulnerability in systeminformation — systeminformation 6.4 Medium 2020-12-16
CVE-2020-26259 XStream is vulnerable to an Arbitrary File Deletion on the local host when unmarshalling — xstream 6.8 Medium 2020-12-16
CVE-2020-12148 OS Command Injection - nslookup API — ECOS 6.8 Medium 2020-12-11
CVE-2020-12149 OS Command Injection - Management File Upload — ECOS 6.8 Medium 2020-12-11
CVE-2020-26245 Prototype Pollution leading to Command Injection in systeminformation — systeminformation 8.1 High 2020-11-27
CVE-2020-3586 Cisco DNA Spaces Connector Command Injection Vulnerability — Cisco DNA Spaces Connector 9.4 Critical 2020-11-18
CVE-2020-3367 Cisco Secure Web Appliance Privilege Escalation Vulnerability — Cisco Web Security Appliance (WSA) 7.8 - 2020-11-18
CVE-2020-26217 Remote Code Execution in XStream — xstream 8.0 High 2020-11-16
CVE-2020-8270 多款Citrix Systems产品操作系统命令注入漏洞 — Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops 8.8 - 2020-11-16
CVE-2020-8273 Citrix Systems SD-WAN Center 操作系统命令注入漏洞 — Citrix SD-WAN Center 8.8 - 2020-11-16

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-78 (OS命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(OS命令注入)) represent 4006 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.