Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-799 (交互频率的控制不恰当) — Vulnerability Class 49

49 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-799 (交互频率的控制不恰当). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-799 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to restrict the rate or volume of interactions with external actors, whether human users or automated bots. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by flooding the system with rapid-fire requests, aiming to exhaust server resources and trigger a denial-of-service condition, or to bypass logical safeguards like rate-limited login attempts. To mitigate this risk, developers must implement robust rate-limiting mechanisms and throttling controls at both the application and network layers. By enforcing strict thresholds on request frequency, systems can effectively distinguish between legitimate traffic and malicious abuse, ensuring service availability and preserving the integrity of business logic against automated exploitation attempts.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not properly limit the number or frequency of interactions that it has with an actor, such as the number of incoming requests. This can allow the actor to perform actions more frequently than expected. The actor could be a human or an automated process such as a virus or bot. This could be used to cause a denial of service, compromise program logic (such as limiting humans to a single vote), or other consequences. For example, an authentication routine might not limit the number of times an attacker can guess a password. Or, a web site might conduct a poll but only expect humans to vote a maximum of once a day.
Common Consequences (1)
Availability, Access Control, Other DoS: Resource Consumption (Other), Bypass Protection Mechanism, Other
Examples (1)
In the following code a username and password is read from a socket and an attempt is made to authenticate the username and password. The code will continuously checked the socket for a username and password until it has been authenticated.
char username[USERNAME_SIZE]; char password[PASSWORD_SIZE]; while (isValidUser == 0) { if (getNextMessage(socket, username, USERNAME_SIZE) > 0) { if (getNextMessage(socket, password, PASSWORD_SIZE) > 0) { isValidUser = AuthenticateUser(username, password); } } } return(SUCCESS);
Bad · C
int count = 0; while ((isValidUser == 0) && (count < MAX_ATTEMPTS)) { if (getNextMessage(socket, username, USERNAME_SIZE) > 0) { if (getNextMessage(socket, password, PASSWORD_SIZE) > 0) { isValidUser = AuthenticateUser(username, password); } } count++; } if (isValidUser) { return(SUCCESS); } else { return(FAIL); }
Good · C
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-85586 phpMyFAQ before 4.1.8 CAPTCHA Bypass via store parameter — phpMyFAQ 6.9 Medium 2026-09-04
CVE-2026-54738 Lemmy: Rate limit bypass via X-Forwarded-For header spoofing in actix-web ConnectionInfo — lemmy 6.5 Medium 2026-08-19
CVE-2024-23565 HCL Aftermarket EPC 资源管理错误漏洞 — Aftermarket EPC 5.3 Medium 2026-07-17
CVE-2026-33434 Wazuh: Rate Limit Bypass via /events Endpoint — wazuh 4.3 Medium 2026-07-16
CVE-2026-5233 Missing Rate Limiting in Mia Technologies' Pizzy Library — Pizzy Library 7.1 High 2026-06-15
CVE-2026-7402 Improper Rate Limiting in MeWare Software's PDKS — PDKS 8.1 High 2026-04-30
CVE-2026-41346 OpenClaw 2026.2.26 < 2026.3.31 - Denial of Service via Improper Pending Pairing Request Cap Enforcement — OpenClaw 5.3 Medium 2026-04-23
CVE-2026-41343 OpenClaw < 2026.3.31 - Denial of Service via LINE Webhook Handler Pre-Auth Concurrency — OpenClaw 5.3 Medium 2026-04-23
CVE-2026-41333 OpenClaw < 2026.3.31 - Authentication Rate Limiting Bypass via Fake DeviceToken — OpenClaw 3.7 Low 2026-04-23
CVE-2025-55268 HCL Aftermarket DPC is affected by Spamming Vulnerability — Aftermarket DPC 4.3 Medium 2026-03-26
CVE-2025-13212 IBM Aspera Console Denial of Service — Aspera Console 5.3 Medium 2026-03-13
CVE-2026-22216 wpDiscuz before 7.6.47 - No Rate Limiting on Subscription Endpoints with LIKE Wildcard Bypass — wpDiscuz 6.5 Medium 2026-03-13
CVE-2026-30972 Parse Server has a rate limit bypass via batch request endpoint — parse-server 5.3AI Medium AI 2026-03-10
CVE-2026-24017 Fortinet FortiWeb 安全漏洞 — FortiWeb 7.3 High 2026-03-10
CVE-2025-13211 IBM Aspera Orchestrator Denial of Service — Aspera Orchestrator 5.3 Medium 2025-12-11
CVE-2025-57816 Fides Webserver API Rate Limiting Vulnerability in Proxied Environments — fides 7.5AI High AI 2025-09-08
CVE-2024-47065 Traceroute_APP responses are not rate-limited. — firmware 5.3AI Medium AI 2025-07-11
CVE-2025-52880 Komga Vulnerable to Arbitrary Code Execution via Crafted EPUB File — komga 4.2 Medium 2025-06-24
CVE-2025-52570 Letmein connection limiter allows an arbitrary amount of simultaneous connections — letmein 6.5AI Medium AI 2025-06-24
CVE-2025-48016 Improper Control of Interaction Frequency — SEL-5056 Software-Defined Network Flow Controller 4.3 Medium 2025-05-20
CVE-2025-32378 Shopware's default newsletter opt-in settings allow for mass sign-up abuse — shopware 6.5AI Medium AI 2025-04-09
CVE-2025-29998 No Rate Limiting Vulnerability in CAP back office application — CAP back office application 8.1 - 2025-03-13
CVE-2025-26524 No Rate Limiting Vulnerability in RupeeWeb trading platform — RupeeWeb 8.1 - 2025-02-14
CVE-2024-13274 Open Social - Moderately critical - Denial of Service - SA-CONTRIB-2024-038 — Open Social 9.8 - 2025-01-09
CVE-2024-51557 No Rate Limiting Vulnerability in Wave 2.0 — Wave 2.0 8.1AI High AI 2024-11-04
CVE-2024-47654 No Rate Limiting vulnerability — Client Dashboard 9.1 - 2024-10-04
CVE-2024-9199 Rate limit vulnerability in Clibo Manager — Clibo Manager 5.8 Medium 2024-09-26
CVE-2024-45788 No Rate Limiting Vulnerability — Mutual Fund Distribution Product (aiM-Star) 8.1AI High AI 2024-09-11
CVE-2024-32943 Westermo L210-F2G Lynx Improper Control of Interaction Frequency — L210-F2G Lynx 7.5 High 2024-06-20
CVE-2024-35246 Westermo L210-F2G Lynx Improper Control of Interaction Frequency — L210-F2G Lynx 7.5 High 2024-06-20

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-799 (交互频率的控制不恰当) represent 49 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.