Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) — Vulnerability Class 23914

23914 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-79 represents a critical input validation weakness where software fails to properly sanitize user-supplied data before rendering it in web pages. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts, often JavaScript, into trusted websites. When other users view the compromised page, the embedded code executes in their browsers, allowing the attacker to steal session cookies, hijack accounts, or redirect victims to phishing sites. This breach of trust undermines user privacy and application integrity. To prevent such attacks, developers must implement robust input validation and output encoding strategies. By strictly filtering incoming data and ensuring that all dynamic content is properly escaped before being processed by the browser, developers can neutralize dangerous inputs and effectively mitigate the risk of cross-site scripting vulnerabilities.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. There are many variants of cross-site scripting, characterized by a variety of terms or involving different attack topologies. However, they all indicate the same fundamental weakness: improper neutralization of dangerous input between the adversary and a victim.
Common Consequences (3)
Access Control, Confidentiality Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The most common attack performed with cross-site scripting involves the disclosure of private information stored in user cookies, such as session information. Typically, a malicious user will craft a client-side script, which -- when parsed by a web browser -- performs some activity on behalf of the…
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
In some circumstances it may be possible to run arbitrary code on a victim's computer when cross-site scripting is combined with other flaws, for example, "drive-by hacking."
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability, Access Control Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands, Bypass Protection Mechanism, Read Application Data
The consequence of an XSS attack is the same regardless of whether it is stored or reflected. The difference is in how the payload arrives at the server. XSS can cause a variety of problems for the end user that range in severity from an annoyance to complete account compromise. Some cross-site scri…
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. Examples of libraries and frameworks that make it easier to generate properly encoded output include Microsoft's Anti-XSS library, the OWASP ESAPI Encoding module, and Apache Wicket.
Implementation, Architecture and Design Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages. Study all expected communication protocols and data representations to determine the required e…
Architecture and Design, Implementation Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly throug…
Effectiveness: Limited
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Examples (2)
The following code displays a welcome message on a web page based on the HTTP GET username parameter (covers a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario).
$username = $_GET['username']; echo '<div class="header"> Welcome, ' . $username . '</div>';
Bad · PHP
http://trustedSite.example.com/welcome.php?username=<Script Language="Javascript">alert("You've been attacked!");</Script>
Attack
The following code displays a Reflected XSS (Type 1) scenario.
<% String eid = request.getParameter("eid"); %> ... Employee ID: <%= eid %>
Bad · JSP
<% protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox Login; protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label EmployeeID; ... EmployeeID.Text = Login.Text; %> <p><asp:label id="EmployeeID" runat="server" /></p>
Bad · ASP.NET
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-30563 WordPress Tidekey plugin <= 1.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Tidekey 7.1 High 2025-04-01
CVE-2025-30547 WordPress WP Cards plugin <= 1.5.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — WP Cards 7.1 High 2025-04-01
CVE-2025-30559 WordPress Kento WordPress Stats plugin <= 1.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Kento WordPress Stats 7.1 High 2025-04-01
CVE-2025-30520 WordPress Breezing Forms plugin <= 1.2.8.11 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Breezing Forms 7.1 High 2025-04-01
CVE-2025-30548 WordPress Advanced Post Search plugin <= 1.1.0 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Advanced Post Search 7.1 High 2025-04-01
CVE-2025-30544 WordPress OK Poster Group plugin <= 1.1 - Reflected Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — OK Poster Group 7.1 High 2025-04-01
CVE-2025-1665 Avada Builder <= 3.11.14 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Avada (Fusion) Builder 6.4 Medium 2025-04-01
CVE-2025-3036 yzk2356911358 StudentServlet-JSP Student Management cross site scripting — StudentServlet-JSP 2.4 Low 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31697 Formatter Suite - Moderately critical - Cross site scripting - SA-CONTRIB-2025-026 — Formatter Suite 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31696 RapiDoc OAS Field Formatter - Moderately critical - Cross site scripting - SA-CONTRIB-2025-025 — RapiDoc OAS Field Formatter 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31695 Link field display mode formatter - Moderately critical - Cross site scripting - SA-CONTRIB-2025-024 — Link field display mode formatter 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31687 SpamSpan filter - Moderately critical - Cross Site Scripting - SA-CONTRIB-2025-016 — SpamSpan filter 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31682 Google Tag - Moderately critical - Cross Site Scripting - SA-CONTRIB-2025-011 — Google Tag 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31679 Ignition Error Pages - Critical - Cross Site Scripting - SA-CONTRIB-2025-007 — Ignition Error Pages 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31675 Drupal core - Moderately critical - Cross Site Scripting - SA-CORE-2025-004 — Drupal core 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-3057 Drupal core - Critical - Cross site scripting - SA-CORE-2025-001 — Drupal core 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31128 gifplayer XSS vulnerability — gifplayer 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-3005 Sayski ForestBlog Friend Link cross site scripting — ForestBlog 3.5 Low 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-3004 Sayski ForestBlog search cross site scripting — ForestBlog 3.5 Low 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-30006 Xorcom CompletePBX <= 5.2.35 Reflected Cross-Site Scripting — CompletePBX 6.1 Medium 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-30223 Beego allows Reflected/Stored XSS in Beego's RenderForm() Function Due to Unescaped User Input — beego 9.3 Critical 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-30149 OpenEMR Reflected XSS in AJAX Script — openemr 6.4 Medium 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-29772 OpenEMR allows Reflected XSS in CAMOS new.php — openemr 6.1 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2024-12021 Stored Cross-Site Scripting — Coverity 5.4 - 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31629 WordPress Infusionsoft Web Form JavaScript plugin <= 1.1.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Infusionsoft Web Form JavaScript 6.5 Medium 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31627 WordPress Media Library Assistant plugin <= 3.24 - Stored Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Media LIbrary Assistant 5.9 Medium 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31625 WordPress Useinfluence plugin <= 1.0.8 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability — Useinfluence 7.1 High 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31624 WordPress Processing Projects plugin <= 1.0.2 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — Processing Projects 6.5 Medium 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31620 WordPress CoverManager plugin <= 0.0.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — CoverManager 6.5 Medium 2025-03-31
CVE-2025-31621 WordPress byBrick Accordion plugin <= 1.0 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability — byBrick Accordion 6.5 Medium 2025-03-31

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-79 (在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)) represent 23914 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.