Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-862 (授权机制缺失) — Vulnerability Class 8300

8300 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-862 (授权机制缺失). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-862 represents a critical access control weakness where software fails to verify an actor’s permissions before granting access to resources or executing actions. Attackers typically exploit this flaw by manipulating requests to access sensitive data or perform privileged operations that should be restricted to authorized users. Without proper checks, malicious actors can bypass authentication mechanisms entirely, leading to unauthorized data exposure, modification, or system compromise. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing robust authorization logic at every entry point, ensuring that identity verification is coupled with strict permission validation. This involves checking user roles and access rights against the requested resource before processing any request. By integrating these checks into the application’s core architecture and utilizing established frameworks, teams can prevent unauthorized access and maintain the integrity of their systems against exploitation.

MITRE CWE Description
The product does not perform an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.
Common Consequences (4)
Confidentiality Read Application Data, Read Files or Directories
An attacker could read sensitive data, either by reading the data directly from a data store that is not restricted, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality to read the data.
Integrity Modify Application Data, Modify Files or Directories
An attacker could modify sensitive data, either by writing the data directly to a data store that is not restricted, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality to write the data.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism
An attacker could gain privileges by modifying or reading critical data directly, or by accessing privileged functionality.
Availability DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart, DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU), DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory), DoS: Resource Consumption (Other)
An attacker could gain unauthorized access to resources on the system and excessively consume those resources, leading to a denial of service.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Divide the product into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) [REF-229] to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries. Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the …
Architecture and Design Ensure that access control checks are performed related to the business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that are applied to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible…
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid. For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].
Architecture and Design For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page. One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests …
System Configuration, Installation Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.
Examples (2)
This function runs an arbitrary SQL query on a given database, returning the result of the query.
function runEmployeeQuery($dbName, $name){ mysql_select_db($dbName,$globalDbHandle) or die("Could not open Database".$dbName); //Use a prepared statement to avoid CWE-89 $preparedStatement = $globalDbHandle->prepare('SELECT * FROM employees WHERE name = :name'); $preparedStatement->execute(array(':name' => $name)); return $preparedStatement->fetchAll(); } /.../ $employeeRecord = runEmployeeQuery('EmployeeDB',$_GET['EmployeeName']);
Bad · PHP
The following program could be part of a bulletin board system that allows users to send private messages to each other. This program intends to authenticate the user before deciding whether a private message should be displayed. Assume that LookupMessageObject() ensures that the $id argument is numeric, constructs a filename based on that id, and reads the message details from that file. Also ass…
sub DisplayPrivateMessage { my($id) = @_; my $Message = LookupMessageObject($id); print "From: " . encodeHTML($Message->{from}) . "<br>\n"; print "Subject: " . encodeHTML($Message->{subject}) . "\n"; print "<hr>\n"; print "Body: " . encodeHTML($Message->{body}) . "\n"; } my $q = new CGI; # For purposes of this example, assume that CWE-309 and # CWE-523 do not apply. if (! AuthenticateUser($q->param('username'), $q->param('password'))) { ExitError("invalid username or password"); } my $id = $q->param('id'); DisplayPrivateMessage($id);
Bad · Perl
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-62128 WordPress Creator LMS plugin <= 1.2.21 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — Creator LMS 5.3 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-105891 WordPress Event Tickets plugin <= 5.30.0.1 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — Event Tickets 4.3 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-103072 WordPress VillaTheme Core plugin <= 1.0.5 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — VillaTheme Core 4.3 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-105888 WordPress Event Tickets plugin <= 5.30.0.1 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — Event Tickets 5.4 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-106596 WordPress Visual Composer Website Builder plugin <= 45.16.3 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — Visual Composer Website Builder 5.3 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-105886 WordPress Ultimate Post Kit plugin <= 4.5.5 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — Ultimate Post Kit 6.5 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-105878 WordPress YITH WooCommerce Product Bundles plugin <= 2.29.0 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — YITH WooCommerce Product Bundles 5.3 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-106600 WordPress GiveWP plugin <= 4.18.0 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — GiveWP 5.3 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-104660 Missing Authorization in hMailServer — hMailServer 7.8 High 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-87669 Brocade Fabric OS <10.0.1 REST API越权漏洞 — Fabric OS 5.1 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-76272 Missing Access Control through the REST API in Splunk Secure Gateway — Splunk Enterprise 4.3 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-107352 Missing authorization checks in Amazon Athena engine version 3 request handling — Amazon Athena 7.7 High 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-96335 WordPress Forminator plugin <= 1.57.2 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — Forminator 7.5 High 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-20328 Cisco Smart Software Manager On-Prem Arbitrary Account Password Reset Vulnerability — Cisco License On-Prem 9.1 Critical 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-62179 PraisonAI: Platform members can delete owner issue dependencies through member-owned related issues — praisonai-platform 6.5 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-27434 WordPress WP Rentals theme <= 3.14.2 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — WP Rentals 5.3 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-104390 WordPress Booktics plugin <= 1.0.27 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — Booktics 4.3 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-105876 WordPress Modula Image Gallery plugin <= 3.0.11 - Sensitive Data Exposure vulnerability — Modula Image Gallery 5.3 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-103075 WordPress Hustle plugin <= 7.8.14.2 - Broken Access Control vulnerability — Hustle 4.3 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-93026 Veeam Backup & Replication备份查看器修改主键漏洞 — Backup and Replication 6.1 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-58068 Veeam Agent for Windows 本地用户进程终止漏洞 — Agent for Windows 6.8 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-81535 wolfSSH SSH client accepts unsolicited forwarded-tcpip channel opens without an authorization check — wolfSSH 6.3 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-102410 Missing Authorization in Kibana Leading to Information Disclosure — Kibana 4.3 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-103620 Missing authorization in GitHub Enterprise Server allowed repository writers to replace default branches via GraphQL — Enterprise Server 6.0 Medium 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106355 Chrome <155.0.8059.39 Windows缺省授权漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106418 Chrome <155.0.8059.39 网络授权缺失漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106288 Google Chrome <155.0.8059.39 授权缺失漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106264 Chrome<155.0.8059.39 Web认证缺少授权漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106362 Chrome低于155.0.8059.39 DevTools缺少授权漏洞 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06
CVE-2026-106191 Chrome <155.0.8059.39 权限缺失致远程代码执行 — Chrome - - 2026-10-06

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-862 (授权机制缺失) represent 8300 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.