Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) — Vulnerability Class 10280

10280 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-89 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs SQL commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious SQL syntax into user-facing inputs, such as login fields or search queries, to manipulate the database’s behavior. This exploitation can lead to unauthorized data access, data modification, or complete system compromise by bypassing authentication or executing arbitrary commands. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing strict input validation and, most effectively, using parameterized queries or prepared statements. These techniques ensure that user input is treated strictly as data rather than executable code, thereby preventing the injection of malicious SQL elements. By separating code logic from data inputs, applications maintain integrity and protect sensitive information from unauthorized manipulation.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Common Consequences (5)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Adversaries could execute system commands, typically by changing the SQL statement to redirect output to a file that can then be executed.
Confidentiality Read Application Data
Since SQL databases generally hold sensitive data, loss of confidentiality is a frequent problem with SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Authentication Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism
If poor SQL commands are used to check user names and passwords or perform other kinds of authentication, it may be possible to connect to the product as another user with no previous knowledge of the password.
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If authorization information is held in a SQL database, it may be possible to change this information through the successful exploitation of a SQL injection vulnerability.
Integrity Modify Application Data
Just as it may be possible to read sensitive information, it is also possible to modify or even delete this information with a SQL injection attack.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedur…
Architecture and Design, Operation Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database ad…
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Implementation While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or whit…
Examples (2)
In 2008, a large number of web servers were compromised using the same SQL injection attack string. This single string worked against many different programs. The SQL injection was then used to modify the web sites to serve malicious code.
The following code dynamically constructs and executes a SQL query that searches for items matching a specified name. The query restricts the items displayed to those where owner matches the user name of the currently-authenticated user.
... string userName = ctx.getAuthenticatedUserName(); string query = "SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = '" + userName + "' AND itemname = '" + ItemName.Text + "'"; sda = new SqlDataAdapter(query, conn); DataTable dt = new DataTable(); sda.Fill(dt); ...
Bad · C#
SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = <userName> AND itemname = <itemName>;
Informative
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2025-30843 WordPress bizcalendar-web plugin <= 1.1.0.34 - SQL Injection vulnerability — bizcalendar-web 7.6 High 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-30819 WordPress Simple Giveaways plugin <= 2.48.1 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Simple Giveaways 8.5 High 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-30810 WordPress Lead Form Data Collection to CRM plugin <= 3.0.1 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Lead Form Data Collection to CRM 8.5 High 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-30806 WordPress Vimeotheque plugin <= 2.3.4.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Vimeotheque 8.5 High 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-30791 WordPress Cart tracking for WooCommerce plugin <= 1.0.16 - SQL Injection Vulnerability — Cart tracking for WooCommerce 7.6 High 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-30784 WordPress WP Subscription Forms plugin <= 1.2.3 - SQL Injection Vulnerability — WP Subscription Forms 8.5 High 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-30775 WordPress WPGuppy plugin <= 1.1.3 - SQL Injection vulnerability — WPGuppy 8.5 High 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-30765 WordPress FlexStock plugin <= 3.13.1 - SQL Injection Vulnerability — FlexStock 7.6 High 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-2831 mingyuefusu 明月复苏 tushuguanlixitong 图书管理系统 bookList getBookList sql injection — tushuguanlixitong 图书管理系统 6.3 Medium 2025-03-27
CVE-2025-30217 Frappe has possibility of SQL injection due to improper validations — frappe 7.5AI High AI 2025-03-26
CVE-2025-26941 WordPress Church Admin plugin <= 5.0.18 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Church Admin 9.3 Critical 2025-03-26
CVE-2025-28939 WordPress WP Google Calendar Manager plugin <= 2.1 - SQL Injection vulnerability — WP Google Calendar Manager 8.5 High 2025-03-26
CVE-2025-28942 WordPress Trust Payments Gateway for WooCommerce plugin <= 1.1.4 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Trust Payments Gateway for WooCommerce 9.3 Critical 2025-03-26
CVE-2025-30524 WordPress Product Catalog plugin <= 1.0.4 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Product Catalog 9.3 Critical 2025-03-26
CVE-2025-28898 WordPress WP Multistore Locator plugin <= 2.5.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability — WP Multistore Locator 9.3 Critical 2025-03-26
CVE-2025-28873 WordPress Shuffle plugin <= 0.5 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Shuffle 8.5 High 2025-03-26
CVE-2025-28904 WordPress Web Directory Free plugin <= 1.7.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Web Directory Free 9.3 Critical 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-30212 Frappe has possibility of SQL injection due to improper validations — frappe 7.5AI High AI 2025-03-25
CVE-2024-53678 Apache VCL: SQL injection vulnerability in New Block Allocation form — Apache VCL 5.3AI Medium AI 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-2740 PHPGurukul Old Age Home Management System eligibility.php sql injection — Old Age Home Management System 7.3 High 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-2739 PHPGurukul Old Age Home Management System manage-services.php sql injection — Old Age Home Management System 7.3 High 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-2738 PHPGurukul Old Age Home Management System manage-scdetails.php sql injection — Old Age Home Management System 7.3 High 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-2737 PHPGurukul Old Age Home Management System contactus.php sql injection — Old Age Home Management System 7.3 High 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-2736 PHPGurukul Old Age Home Management System bwdates-report-details.php sql injection — Old Age Home Management System 7.3 High 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-2735 PHPGurukul Old Age Home Management System add-services.php sql injection — Old Age Home Management System 7.3 High 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-2734 PHPGurukul Old Age Home Management System aboutus.php sql injection — Old Age Home Management System 7.3 High 2025-03-25
CVE-2024-44903 SirsiDynix Horizon SQL注入漏洞 — IPAC20 7.5 High 2025-03-25
CVE-2025-30604 WordPress JiangQie Official Website Mini Program plugin <= 1.8.2 - SQL Injection Vulnerability — JiangQie Official Website Mini Program 7.6 High 2025-03-24
CVE-2025-30590 WordPress Flickr set slideshows plugin <= 0.9 - SQL Injection Vulnerability — Flickr set slideshows 8.5 High 2025-03-24
CVE-2025-30571 WordPress STEdb Forms plugin <= 1.0.4 - SQL Injection Vulnerability — STEdb Forms 7.6 High 2025-03-24

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) represent 10280 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.