Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) — Vulnerability Class 10255

10255 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-89 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs SQL commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious SQL syntax into user-facing inputs, such as login fields or search queries, to manipulate the database’s behavior. This exploitation can lead to unauthorized data access, data modification, or complete system compromise by bypassing authentication or executing arbitrary commands. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing strict input validation and, most effectively, using parameterized queries or prepared statements. These techniques ensure that user input is treated strictly as data rather than executable code, thereby preventing the injection of malicious SQL elements. By separating code logic from data inputs, applications maintain integrity and protect sensitive information from unauthorized manipulation.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Common Consequences (5)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Adversaries could execute system commands, typically by changing the SQL statement to redirect output to a file that can then be executed.
Confidentiality Read Application Data
Since SQL databases generally hold sensitive data, loss of confidentiality is a frequent problem with SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Authentication Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism
If poor SQL commands are used to check user names and passwords or perform other kinds of authentication, it may be possible to connect to the product as another user with no previous knowledge of the password.
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If authorization information is held in a SQL database, it may be possible to change this information through the successful exploitation of a SQL injection vulnerability.
Integrity Modify Application Data
Just as it may be possible to read sensitive information, it is also possible to modify or even delete this information with a SQL injection attack.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedur…
Architecture and Design, Operation Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database ad…
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Implementation While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or whit…
Examples (2)
In 2008, a large number of web servers were compromised using the same SQL injection attack string. This single string worked against many different programs. The SQL injection was then used to modify the web sites to serve malicious code.
The following code dynamically constructs and executes a SQL query that searches for items matching a specified name. The query restricts the items displayed to those where owner matches the user name of the currently-authenticated user.
... string userName = ctx.getAuthenticatedUserName(); string query = "SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = '" + userName + "' AND itemname = '" + ItemName.Text + "'"; sda = new SqlDataAdapter(query, conn); DataTable dt = new DataTable(); sda.Fill(dt); ...
Bad · C#
SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = <userName> AND itemname = <itemName>;
Informative
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2023-37924 Apache Submarine: SQL injection from unauthorized login — Apache Submarine 8.8AI High AI 2023-11-22
CVE-2023-22275 ZDI-CAN-21306: Adobe RoboHelp Server GetNewUserId SQL Injection Information Disclosure Vulnerability — RoboHelp 7.5 High 2023-11-17
CVE-2023-22268 ZDI-CAN-21308: Adobe RoboHelp Server getRHSGroupsForRoles SQL Injection Information Disclosure Vulnerability — RoboHelp 6.5 Medium 2023-11-17
CVE-2023-47637 SQL Injection in Admin Grid Filter API in Pimcore — pimcore 8.8 High 2023-11-15
CVE-2023-34991 Fortinet FortiWLM 安全漏洞 — FortiWLM 9.3 Critical 2023-11-14
CVE-2023-46097 Siemens SIMATIC PCS 安全漏洞 — SIMATIC PCS neo 6.3 Medium 2023-11-14
CVE-2023-6097 SQL Injection on ICSSolution ICS Business Manager — ICS Business Manager 9.4 Critical 2023-11-13
CVE-2023-6084 Tongda OA 2017 delete.php sql injection — OA 2017 6.3 Medium 2023-11-12
CVE-2023-47128 piccolo SQL Injection via named transaction savepoints — piccolo 9.1 Critical 2023-11-10
CVE-2023-41285 QuMagie — QuMagie 7.4 High 2023-11-10
CVE-2023-41284 QuMagie — QuMagie 7.4 High 2023-11-10
CVE-2023-6074 PHPGurukul Restaurant Table Booking System Booking Reservation check-status.php sql injection — Restaurant Table Booking System 6.3 Medium 2023-11-10
CVE-2023-6054 Tongda OA 2017 lock.php sql injection — OA 2017 5.5 Medium 2023-11-09
CVE-2023-6053 Tongda OA 2017 delete.php sql injection — OA 2017 6.3 Medium 2023-11-09
CVE-2023-6052 Tongda OA 2017 delete.php sql injection — OA 2017 6.3 Medium 2023-11-09
CVE-2023-46800 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Matrimonial Project 9.8 Critical 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46793 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Matrimonial Project 9.8 Critical 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46789 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Matrimonial Project 9.8 Critical 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46788 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Matrimonial Project 9.8 Critical 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46787 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Matrimonial Project 9.8 Critical 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46785 Online Matrimonial Project v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Matrimonial Project 9.8 Critical 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46679 Online Job Portal v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Job Portal 9.8 Critical 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46677 Online Job Portal v1.0 - Multiple Unauthenticated SQL Injections (SQLi) — Online Job Portal 9.8 Critical 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-5709 WD WidgetTwitter <= 1.0.9 - Authenticated (Contributor+) SQL Injection via Shortcode — WD WidgetTwitter 8.8 High 2023-11-07
CVE-2023-46823 WordPress ImageLinks Interactive Image Builder Plugin <= 1.5.4 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — ImageLinks Interactive Image Builder for WordPress 7.6 High 2023-11-06
CVE-2023-46821 WordPress GD Security Headers Plugin <= 1.7 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — GD Security Headers 7.6 High 2023-11-06
CVE-2023-46084 WordPress Icons Font Loader Plugin <= 1.1.2 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Icons Font Loader 8.5 High 2023-11-06
CVE-2023-45830 WordPress Accessibility Suite by Online ADA Plugin <= 4.12 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Accessibility Suite by Online ADA 8.5 High 2023-11-06
CVE-2023-45657 WordPress Nexter Theme <= 2.0.3 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Nexter 8.5 High 2023-11-06
CVE-2023-35911 WordPress Contact Form Generator Plugin <= 2.6.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection — Contact Form Generator : Creative form builder for WordPress 8.5 High 2023-11-06

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) represent 10255 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.