Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) — Vulnerability Class 10255

10255 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-89 represents a critical input validation weakness where software constructs SQL commands using untrusted data without properly sanitizing special characters. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious SQL syntax into user-facing inputs, such as login fields or search queries, to manipulate the database’s behavior. This exploitation can lead to unauthorized data access, data modification, or complete system compromise by bypassing authentication or executing arbitrary commands. Developers mitigate this risk by implementing strict input validation and, most effectively, using parameterized queries or prepared statements. These techniques ensure that user input is treated strictly as data rather than executable code, thereby preventing the injection of malicious SQL elements. By separating code logic from data inputs, applications maintain integrity and protect sensitive information from unauthorized manipulation.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of an SQL command using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the intended SQL command when it is sent to a downstream component. Without sufficient removal or quoting of SQL syntax in user-controllable inputs, the generated SQL query can cause those inputs to be interpreted as SQL instead of ordinary user data.
Common Consequences (5)
Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
Adversaries could execute system commands, typically by changing the SQL statement to redirect output to a file that can then be executed.
Confidentiality Read Application Data
Since SQL databases generally hold sensitive data, loss of confidentiality is a frequent problem with SQL injection vulnerabilities.
Authentication Gain Privileges or Assume Identity, Bypass Protection Mechanism
If poor SQL commands are used to check user names and passwords or perform other kinds of authentication, it may be possible to connect to the product as another user with no previous knowledge of the password.
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
If authorization information is held in a SQL database, it may be possible to change this information through the successful exploitation of a SQL injection vulnerability.
Integrity Modify Application Data
Just as it may be possible to read sensitive information, it is also possible to modify or even delete this information with a SQL injection attack.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid [REF-1482]. For example, consider using persistence layers such as Hibernate or Enterprise Java Beans, which can provide significant protection against SQL injection if used properly.
Architecture and Design If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated. Process SQL queries using prepared statements, parameterized queries, or stored procedur…
Architecture and Design, Operation Run your code using the lowest privileges that are required to accomplish the necessary tasks [REF-76]. If possible, create isolated accounts with limited privileges that are only used for a single task. That way, a successful attack will not immediately give the attacker access to the rest of the software or its environment. For example, database applications rarely need to run as the database ad…
Architecture and Design For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
Implementation While it is risky to use dynamically-generated query strings, code, or commands that mix control and data together, sometimes it may be unavoidable. Properly quote arguments and escape any special characters within those arguments. The most conservative approach is to escape or filter all characters that do not pass an extremely strict allowlist (such as everything that is not alphanumeric or whit…
Examples (2)
In 2008, a large number of web servers were compromised using the same SQL injection attack string. This single string worked against many different programs. The SQL injection was then used to modify the web sites to serve malicious code.
The following code dynamically constructs and executes a SQL query that searches for items matching a specified name. The query restricts the items displayed to those where owner matches the user name of the currently-authenticated user.
... string userName = ctx.getAuthenticatedUserName(); string query = "SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = '" + userName + "' AND itemname = '" + ItemName.Text + "'"; sda = new SqlDataAdapter(query, conn); DataTable dt = new DataTable(); sda.Fill(dt); ...
Bad · C#
SELECT * FROM items WHERE owner = <userName> AND itemname = <itemName>;
Informative
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-54187 WordPress JetEngine plugin <= 3.8.10.1 - SQL Injection vulnerability — JetEngine 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-54186 WordPress JobSearch plugin <= 3.2.9 - SQL Injection vulnerability — JobSearch 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-54185 WordPress Cornerstone plugin < 7.8.8 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Cornerstone 8.5 High 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-49084 WordPress JetEngine plugin < 3.8.9.1 - SQL Injection vulnerability — JetEngine 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-49079 WordPress JetSearch plugin <= 3.5.17 - SQL Injection vulnerability — JetSearch 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-49076 WordPress JetEngine plugin <= 3.8.9.1 - SQL Injection vulnerability — JetEngine 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-48967 WordPress Geo Mashup plugin <= 1.13.19 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Geo Mashup 8.5 High 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-48875 WordPress JetSmartFilters plugin <= 3.8.1 - SQL Injection vulnerability — JetSmartFilters 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-39596 WordPress Blocksy Companion Pro plugin < 2.1.29 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Blocksy Companion Pro 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-22340 WordPress WPJobster theme <= 6.3.5 - SQL Injection vulnerability — WPJobster 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-22335 WordPress WooCommerce Frontend Manager – Ultimate plugin < 6.7.7 - SQL Injection vulnerability — WooCommerce Frontend Manager – Ultimate 8.5 High 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-22332 WordPress Tutor LMS Pro plugin <= 3.9.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Tutor LMS Pro 9.3 Critical 2026-06-17
CVE-2025-69135 WordPress Events Schedule - WordPress Events Calendar Plugin plugin <= 2.7.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Events Schedule - WordPress Events Calendar Plugin 8.5 High 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-12360 JetEngine <= 3.8.10.1 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via Listing Grid Load More AJAX Endpoint — JetEngine 7.5 High 2026-06-17
CVE-2026-49073 WordPress Directorist Booking plugin <= 3.0.3 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Directorist Booking 8.5 High 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-49080 WordPress wpDataTables plugin <= 7.3.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability — wpDataTables 9.3 Critical 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-39438 WordPress ListingPro plugin <= 2.9.10 - SQL Injection vulnerability — ListingPro 9.3 Critical 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-49772 WordPress The Events Calendar plugin 6.15.12-6.16.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability — The Events Calendar 9.3 Critical 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-52715 WordPress GEO my WordPress plugin <= 4.5.5 - SQL Injection vulnerability — GEO my WordPress 9.3 Critical 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-52712 WordPress Attendance Manager plugin <= 0.6.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Attendance Manager 7.6 High 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-39581 WordPress WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic plugin <= 1.1.4 - SQL Injection vulnerability — WP Sessions Time Monitoring Full Automatic 8.5 High 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-39574 WordPress InPost Gallery plugin <= 2.1.4.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability — InPost Gallery 9.3 Critical 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-8444 WP Review Slider Pro <= 12.6.8 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection via 'curselrevs' Parameter — WP Review Slider Pro 8.8 High 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-8443 WP Review Slider Pro <= 12.6.8 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) SQL Injection via 'stypes' Parameter — WP Review Slider Pro 8.8 High 2026-06-16
CVE-2026-52700 WordPress WCMultiShipping plugin <= 3.0.2 - SQL Injection vulnerability — WCMultiShipping 8.5 High 2026-06-15
CVE-2026-52697 WordPress Taskbuilder plugin <= 5.0.7 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Taskbuilder 8.5 High 2026-06-15
CVE-2026-52693 WordPress eCommerce Product Catalog plugin <= 3.5.5 - SQL Injection vulnerability — eCommerce Product Catalog 9.3 Critical 2026-06-15
CVE-2026-49776 WordPress GPTranslate – Multilingual AI Translation for WordPress: Automatically Translate Websites plugin <= 2.32.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability — GPTranslate – Multilingual AI Translation for WordPress: Automatically Translate Websites 9.3 Critical 2026-06-15
CVE-2026-49067 WordPress Advanced 301 and 302 Redirect plugin <= 1.6.9 - SQL Injection vulnerability — Advanced 301 and 302 Redirect 9.3 Critical 2026-06-15
CVE-2026-48964 WordPress ELEX WordPress HelpDesk & Customer Ticketing System plugin <= 3.3.6 - SQL Injection vulnerability — ELEX WordPress HelpDesk & Customer Ticketing System 8.5 High 2026-06-15

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-89 (SQL命令中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(SQL注入)) represent 10255 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.