Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 2063

2063 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-76604 Joomla Extension - fabrikar.com - Unauthenticated remote code execution via PHP form element in Fabrik < 4.7.2 — Fabrik extension for Joomla 10.0 Critical 2026-08-22
CVE-2026-3424 kk Star Ratings <= 5.4.10.3 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'payload' Parameter — kk Star Ratings – Rate Post & Collect User Feedbacks 5.3 Medium 2026-08-22
CVE-2026-77415 JSONata: Arbitrary Code Execution via crafted JSONata expressions — jsonata 9.3 Critical 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-77414 JSONata: Arbitrary Code Execution via crafted JSONata expressions — jsonata 9.3 Critical 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-77413 JSONata: Arbitrary Code Execution via crafted JSONata expressions — jsonata 9.3 Critical 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-59989 Phalcon Volt compiler `join` filter compile-time PHP code injection (SSTI lead to RCE) — cphalcon 9.2 Critical 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-68508 Hydra: hydra.utils.instantiate with untrusted config can lead to code execution — hydra 7.8 High 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-62675 Omnigent: Uploaded Agent Bundle Allows Authenticated Runner RCE via Python Callable Tools — omnigent 8.8 High 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-62674 Omnigent: Shared Agent Bundle Overwrite Leads to Authenticated Runner RCE — omnigent 9.0 Critical 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-77806 SPIP 代码注入漏洞 — SPIP 9.8 Critical 2026-08-21
CVE-2026-77647 SPIP 代码注入漏洞 — SPIP 9.8 Critical 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18287 Aeon load_time_series_segmentation_benchmark Code Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — aeon - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-18286 Aeon load_human_activity_segmentation_datasets Code Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — aeon - - 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-73992 WordPress Query Wrangler plugin <= 1.5.57 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Query Wrangler 9.9 Critical 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-77077 n8n before 1.123.69 Remote Code Execution via EventEmitter Prototype Pollution — n8n 7.2 High 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-77075 n8n before 1.123.69 Expression Injection via Resource Locator — n8n 8.4 High 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-77074 n8n before 1.123.69 SSRF via Edit Image Node — n8n 6.0 Medium 2026-08-20
CVE-2026-76760 chenhg5 cc-connect webhook.go authenticate code injection — cc-connect 7.3 High 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-76335 Remote Code Execution (RCE) through Splunk Web Manager Configuration in Splunk Enterprise — Splunk Enterprise 8.8 High 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-76315 Code Injection through Splunk Web Manager Configuration in Splunk Enterprise — Splunk Enterprise 8.8 High 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-76314 Remote Code Execution (RCE) through Splunk Web Manager Configuration in Splunk Enterprise — Splunk Enterprise 8.8 High 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-63187 Logto: OS command injection vulnerability exists in the Commitlint workflow — logto 6.3 Medium 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-18874 Volsync-addon-controller: volsync-addon-controller: annotation values rendered into yaml via text/template without escaping allows yaml injection into subscription — Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.11 6.2 Medium 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-75149 marimo < 0.23.15 Code Injection via MCP Server Configuration — marimo 8.8 High 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-62682 Orval: RCE via servers[].url -> unescaped request-URL template literal (with getBaseUrlFromSpecification) — orval 9.3 Critical 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-72717 Orval: Import-time RCE via schema default -> zod module-level template literal — orval 9.3 Critical 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-71868 Orval: Import-time RCE via enum-typed default -> zod module-level template literal — orval 9.3 Critical 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-71865 Orval: Import-time RCE via query parameter name -> computed-property-key injection in the zod cli — orval 9.3 Critical 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-71869 Orval: Import-time RCE via array-items default -> zod module-level template literal — orval 9.3 Critical 2026-08-19
CVE-2026-71864 Orval: Import-time RCE via header parameter name -> computed-property-key injection in the zod client — orval 9.3 Critical 2026-08-19

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 2063 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.