Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 2060

2060 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-18533 IBM Maximo Application Suite - Location Service for Esri Component Code Execution — Maximo Application Suite - Location Service for Esri Component 6.5 Medium 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-18537 IBM Maximo Application Suite - Location Service for Esri Component Code Execution — Maximo Application Suite - Location Service for Esri Component 8.7 High 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-109347 Adminer before 6.1.1 RCE via UTF-8 BOM SQLite ATTACH Bypass — adminer 7.2 High 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-109308 Craft CMS 4.0.0 before 4.18.7 and 5.0.0 before 5.10.14 RCE via actionCacheUpdates Behavior Injection — cms 8.8 High 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-109199 LogicalDOC Community Edition through 9.3 Code Injection via Velocity sendAsEmail Template — LogicalDOC Community Edition 8.8 High 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-108827 Zen Cart Administrative Module Management general.php zen_call_function code injection — Zen Cart 4.1 Medium 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-108816 agno-agi agno PythonTools python.py run_python_code code injection — agno 6.3 Medium 2026-10-12
CVE-2026-62098 WordPress Boutique theme <= 2.3.3 - Arbitrary Shortcode Execution vulnerability — Boutique 6.5 Medium 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-42696 WordPress SiteVault – Backup, Restore, Migration & Cloning plugin <= 1.5.18 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — SiteVault – Backup, Restore, Migration &amp; Cloning 10.0 Critical 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-39802 WordPress Everest Backup plugin <= 2.3.13 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Everest Backup 8.1 High 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-108598 Floci 1.1.0 before 2.2.0 RCE via API Gateway VTL Mapping Templates — floci 9.8 Critical 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-108593 9router 0.4.1 through 0.5.99 Config Injection RCE via hermes-settings Endpoint — 9router 6.4 Medium 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-103071 WordPress Thank You Page Customizer for WooCommerce plugin <= 1.2.3 - Content Injection vulnerability — Thank You Page Customizer for WooCommerce 7.5 High 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-108551 openapi-typescript-codegen through 0.31.0 Code Injection via Handlebars Templates — openapi-typescript-codegen 9.8 Critical 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-97670 Avada (Fusion) Builder <= 7.16.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary WordPress Action Invocation via '{action_hook}' Dynamic-Data Token in Form Field — Avada (Fusion) Builder 9.1 Critical 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-104021 Fastcache by Host.it <= 1.7.4 - Authenticated (Administrator+) Code Injection via .htaccess Directive Injection via 'cache_cookie_exclude' Setting — Fastcache by Host.it 7.2 High 2026-10-10
CVE-2026-108259 Tina: Code injection via unescaped Git branch name in generated client source — tinacms 8.2 High 2026-10-09
CVE-2026-104082 SmarterMail < Build 9777 SysAdmin Remote Code Execution via Volume Mount — Smartermail 7.2 High 2026-10-09
CVE-2026-107806 Nginx UI: Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Backup Restore App Config Overwrite — nginx-ui 9.4 Critical 2026-10-09
CVE-2026-107732 SumatraPDF: Markup/command-link injection into UI notification text — sumatrapdf 8.4 High 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-11888 Security vulnerabilities have been found in IBM Verify Identity Access and IBM Security Verify Access — Security Verify Access 6.4 Medium 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-107700 dot-access 0.0.3 through 1.0.0 Code Injection via get() Path Argument — dot-access 9.8 Critical 2026-10-08
CVE-2026-76484 Cisco License On-Prem Security Hardening Release — Cisco License On-Prem 8.8 High 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-62176 PraisonAI: Code Injection via f-string Interpolation in Deploy API Server Generation — PraisonAI 9.1 Critical 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-106577 ImageMagick: Code Injection in the postscript coders — ImageMagick 5.3 Medium 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-96408 Movable Type升级脚本SQL注入漏洞 — Movable Type Cloud Edition 9.3 Critical 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-88962 Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities — Langflow OSS 8.8 High 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-93443 Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities — Langflow OSS 7.5 High 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-93449 Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities — Langflow OSS 8.5 High 2026-10-07
CVE-2026-93445 Langflow OSS is affected by multiple vulnerabilities — Langflow OSS 8.1 High 2026-10-07

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 2060 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.