Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1737

1737 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-73076 Vim: Arbitrary Command Execution via Malicious `.VimballRecord` Entry Replay in `vimball.vim` — vim 8.4 High 2026-08-11
CVE-2026-19546 Dbi: incomplete fix for cve-2026-14380 dbi: arbitrary code execution via caller-influenced profile attribute — Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 8.8 High 2026-08-11
CVE-2026-72765 n8n before 2.32.1 Remote Code Execution via Expression Sandbox Escape — n8n 8.7 High 2026-08-11
CVE-2026-58231 Improper Authorization in SAP Commerce Cloud (Data Hub Adapter) — SAP Commerce Cloud (Data Hub Adapter) 10.0 Critical 2026-08-11
CVE-2026-44758 Code Injection vulnerability in Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence — SAP Manufacturing Integration and Intelligence 9.1 Critical 2026-08-11
CVE-2026-66738 SPIP < 4.4.18 Code Injection via Navigation Endpoint on SQLite — SPIP 8.8 High 2026-08-10
CVE-2026-72718 goose: Arbitrary command execution in goose CLI via `goose review` via git core.fsmonitor — goose 7.0 High 2026-08-10
CVE-2026-42537 Apache Ranger: Remote Code Execution via JDBC URL Injection — Apache Ranger - - 2026-08-10
CVE-2026-44416 Apache Ranger: Remote Code Execution via Arbitrary Class Instantiation — Apache Ranger - - 2026-08-10
CVE-2026-55799 Apache Ranger: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in GraalScriptEngineCreator — Apache Ranger - - 2026-08-10
CVE-2026-66915 Joomla Extension - fabrikar.com - Unauthenticated remote code execution in Fabrik < 4.7.2 — Fabrik extension for Joomla 10.0 Critical 2026-08-10
CVE-2026-46409 OpenYak local API: unauthenticated CSRF chain leads to Remote Code Execution — openyak 9.6 Critical 2026-08-07
CVE-2026-17603 Nexus Repository 3 - HikariCP connectionInitSql Injection RCE via DataStore Configuration API — Nexus Repository 3 8.7 High 2026-08-07
CVE-2026-48054 OpenZeppelin Contracts Wizard has Code Injection in Generated Hardhat and Foundry Tests via Unsanitized opts.name / opts.uri — contracts-wizard 8.8 High 2026-08-06
CVE-2026-45572 Decidim: HTML content blocks allow stored script execution — decidim 4.8 Medium 2026-08-06
CVE-2026-50159 Mermaid allows CSS injection applying to sibling elements of the diagram — mermaid 5.3 Medium 2026-08-06
CVE-2026-19060 FoundationAgents MetaGPT code injection — MetaGPT 5.3 Medium 2026-08-06
CVE-2026-19058 FoundationAgents MetaGPT data_interpreter.py DataInterpreter code injection — MetaGPT 5.3 Medium 2026-08-06
CVE-2026-66709 WordPress CTX Feed plugin <= 6.6.42 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — CTX Feed 9.1 Critical 2026-08-06
CVE-2026-65553 WordPress Spider Analyser – WordPress搜索引擎蜘蛛分析插件 plugin <= 2.1.3 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Spider Analyser &#8211; WordPress搜索引擎蜘蛛分析插件 10.0 Critical 2026-08-06
CVE-2026-65548 WordPress Betheme theme <= 28.4.2 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Betheme 9.9 Critical 2026-08-06
CVE-2026-67531 FrontMCP: CodeCall sandbox escape -> host RCE via live Zod schema exposure by getTool — frontmcp 9.3 Critical 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-71319 Nuxt.js Unauthenticated WebSocket RPC Call Leading to Remote Code Execution — devtools 9.6 Critical 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-55522 PraisonAI workflow include bypasses tools.py autoload opt-in and executes included recipe code — PraisonAI 7.8 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-17624 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.5 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-17633 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.5 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-17632 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.8 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-9196 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.1 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-8182 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.8 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-8478 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.8 High 2026-08-05

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1737 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.