Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1743

1743 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-17624 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.5 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-17633 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.5 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-17632 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.8 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-9196 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.1 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-8182 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.8 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-8478 Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component handling — Langflow OSS 8.8 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-70609 Electron: DevTools JavaScript Injection via Unsanitized Dock State Parameter — electron 5.7 Medium 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-71278 rust-iot-platform Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Unsandboxed Calc-Rule Script Evaluation — rust-iot-platform 9.8 Critical 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-71235 Magistrala IoT Platform - Unrestricted Go/Lua Script Execution in Rules Engine — magistrala 8.8 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-71232 MacCMS10 - Incomplete Function Blacklist in Template Editor Enables Authenticated RCE — maccms10 7.2 High 2026-08-05
CVE-2026-70553 MaxSite CMS Unauthenticated RCE via Install Endpoint — MaxSite CMS 9.8 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-70477 Flowise: CSV Agent Prompt Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability — Flowise 9.5 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-69264 Flowise: RCE via CSVAgent csvFile data URI base64 segment is interpolated into Python source without validation — Flowise 9.4 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-69259 Flowise RCE via SQLite Record Manager Node — Flowise 9.4 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-64633 Veeam ONE 代码注入漏洞 — ONE 10.0 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-58074 Veeam ONE 代码注入漏洞 — ONE 8.6 High 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-69256 Flowise: Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in CSVAgent — Flowise 9.4 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-69255 Flowise: CSV Agent Remote Code Execution via Pyodide Code Injection — Root Shell Verified — Flowise 9.2 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-69254 Flowise: RCE via NodeVM Sandbox Escape in executeJavaScriptCode() nodeVMOptions Override — Flowise 9.4 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-69100 LAMP 5.6.2 GlueFactory Unsandboxed Groovy Script Remote Code Execution — lamp-cloud 8.8 High 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-18770 vibesurf-ai VibeSurf Python Validation code code injection — VibeSurf 7.3 High 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-69251 Flowise RCE via TypeORM DataSource — Flowise 9.0 Critical 2026-08-04
CVE-2026-65804 Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Spoofing Vulnerability — Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) 6.1 Medium 2026-08-03
CVE-2026-18667 Sensor Proxy Version 1.4.2 Fixes One Vulnerability — Sensor Proxy 9.6 Critical 2026-08-03
CVE-2026-61523 WebsiteBaker CMS < 2.13.10 Code Injection via Droplets Editor — WebsiteBaker CMS 7.2 High 2026-08-03
CVE-2026-69088 Grav CMS 2.0.7 through 2.0.10 Arbitrary Method Invocation via Blueprint — grav 8.1 High 2026-08-03
CVE-2026-67340 ArcadeDB before 26.7.2 Remote Code Execution via Trigger Scripts — arcadedb 7.2 High 2026-08-01
CVE-2026-16144 Kali Forms <= 2.4.20 - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via 'thisPermalink' Field Parameter — Kali Forms — Contact Form & Drag-and-Drop Builder 8.1 High 2026-08-01
CVE-2026-68770 sentence-transformers Arbitrary Code Execution on Local Model Load Despite trust_remote_code=False — sentence-transformers 9.8 Critical 2026-07-31
CVE-2026-53510 Savon::Model evaluates WSDL operation names as Ruby source — savon 8.1 High 2026-07-31

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1743 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.