Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1685

1685 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access ControlBypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access ControlGain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, AvailabilityExecute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-RepudiationHide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and DesignRefactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and DesignRun your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
ImplementationAssume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
TestingUse dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
OperationRun the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE IDTitleCVSSSeverityPublished
CVE-2026-45534 DataEase: RCE Vulnerability — dataease--2026-07-15
CVE-2026-62350 TDengine: UDF lead to RCE — TDengine 7.2 High2026-07-15
CVE-2026-61446 PraisonAI before 1.6.78 Remote Code Execution via Plugin Auto-Discovery — PraisonAI 8.4 High2026-07-15
CVE-2026-61433 PraisonAI before 4.6.78 Code Injection via API deployment generator — PraisonAI 7.8 High2026-07-15
CVE-2026-58655 Grav Flex Objects - Server-Side Template Injection via Dynamic Titles — grav 8.8 High2026-07-15
CVE-2026-42049 jadx: RCE Via Groovy Code Injection in Gradle Export — jadx--2026-07-14
CVE-2026-46640 Twig: Arbitrary PHP code execution via `_self.(<string>)` macro-reference compilation — Twig--2026-07-14
CVE-2026-46633 Twig: PHP code injection via `{% use %}` template name — Twig--2026-07-14
CVE-2026-48322 ColdFusion | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — ColdFusion 2025 9.9 Critical2026-07-14
CVE-2026-15410 SonicWall SMA1000 代码注入漏洞 — SMA1000--2026-07-14
CVE-2026-50650 .NET Framework Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability — .NET 8.0 7.8 High2026-07-14
CVE-2026-55771 CedarJava has policy injection, type confusion, and incorrect equality comparison vulnerabilities — cedar-java 8.8 High2026-07-13
CVE-2026-55773 CedarJava has a policy injection vulnerability — cedar-java 8.8 High2026-07-13
CVE-2026-12257 Remote code execution in Mura Software’s CMS — CMS--2026-07-13
CVE-2026-57811 WordPress Realtyna Organic IDX plugin plugin <= 5.2.0 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Realtyna Organic IDX plugin 10.0 Critical2026-07-13
CVE-2026-14453 A user with low privileges can inject SSTI templates that can lead to RCE in open-tickets — Infra Monitoring 9.6 Critical2026-07-13
CVE-2026-15533 DedeCMS Column Management search.php code injection — DedeCMS 4.7 Medium2026-07-13
CVE-2026-15512 pig-mesh Pig pig-codegen GeneratorServiceImpl.java code injection — Pig 6.3 Medium2026-07-12
CVE-2026-15497 SonicCloudOrg sonic-agent JWT Authentication Filter ExchangeController.java code injection — sonic-agent 7.3 High2026-07-12
CVE-2026-61447 PraisonAI before 1.6.78 Remote Code Execution via CodeAgent — PraisonAI 10.0 Critical2026-07-11
CVE-2026-13353 WP Ultimate CSV Importer <= 8.0.1 - Missing Authorization to Authenticated (Subscriber+) Remote Code Execution via 'MappedFields' Parameter — WP Ultimate CSV Importer – WordPress Import & Export for CSV, XML & Excel 8.8 High2026-07-11
CVE-2026-61450 Grav before 2.0.2 Config Exfiltration via offsetGet Filter — grav 6.5 Medium2026-07-10
CVE-2026-61444 PraisonAI before 4.6.78 Code Injection via f-string — PraisonAI 9.1 Critical2026-07-10
CVE-2026-54769 Langroid: Sandbox Escape to Remote Code Execution via Incomplete `eval()` Mitigation in TableChatAgent — langroid 10.0 Critical2026-07-09
CVE-2026-59856 Vim: Arbitrary Code Execution via PHP Omni-Completion — vim--2026-07-09
CVE-2026-59858 Vim: Arbitrary Code Execution via C Omni-Completion — vim--2026-07-09
CVE-2026-59826 Metabase: Arbitrary Code Execution via Database Connection Detail Bypass — metabase 9.1 Critical2026-07-09
CVE-2026-59216 Open WebUI: Cross-user code-interpreter and tool execution via unvalidated Socket.IO event-caller session_id — open-webui 7.7 High2026-07-09
CVE-2026-35211 OpenCTI: Elasticsearch Painless Script Injection via GraphQL `script` filter operator allows authenticated user to exfiltrate data and cause DoS — opencti 6.5 Medium2026-07-08
CVE-2026-59821 LiteLLM: Custom Code Guardrails production endpoints bypass code safety checks — litellm--2026-07-08

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1685 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.