Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 2060

2060 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-96758 orval @orval/core before 8.28.0 Code Injection via Form-Data — orval 9.8 Critical 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-96757 orval before 8.29.0 Code Injection via unescaped OpenAPI media-type — orval 9.8 Critical 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-96756 orval before 8.30.0 Code Injection via Factory Generation — orval 8.1 High 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-96755 orval @orval/effect 8.14.0 through 8.28.1 Code Injection — orval 9.8 Critical 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-96754 orval @orval/hono before 8.29.0 Code Injection via OpenAPI Path — orval 9.8 Critical 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-96442 Emacs: emacs: arbitrary code execution in flymake mode — GNU Emacs 7.8 High 2026-09-23
CVE-2026-18162 IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) is Impacted by Multiple Vulnerabilities — Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift 9.8 Critical 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-75703 Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — Adobe Campaign Classic 10.0 Critical 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-84412 Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — Adobe Campaign Classic 10.0 Critical 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-89276 Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — Adobe Campaign Classic 9.9 Critical 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-75721 Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — Adobe Campaign Classic 10.0 Critical 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-73369 Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — Adobe Campaign Classic 10.0 Critical 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-75699 Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — Adobe Campaign Classic 10.0 Critical 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-89275 Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) | Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') (CWE-94) — Adobe Campaign Classic 10.0 Critical 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-95501 mtrano APENCMS Template weasel.php eval code injection — APENCMS 4.3 Medium 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-92235 WP Ultimate Review <= 2.4.2 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'xs_submit_review_data[xs_reviw_summery]' Parameter — WP Ultimate Review 8.1 High 2026-09-22
CVE-2026-94572 OpenStack Octavia 18.0.1前Amphora驱动TLS配置注入漏洞 — Octavia 9.4 Critical 2026-09-21
CVE-2026-94571 OpenStack Octavia <18.0.1 L7配置注入漏洞 — Octavia 9.4 Critical 2026-09-21
CVE-2026-55071 MCP-for-Stata: Stata Command Injection via Unsanitized `package` in `ado_package_install` — mcp-for-stata 8.4 High 2026-09-21
CVE-2026-94103 RooCMS Frontend Rendering site_pagePHP.php eval code injection — RooCMS 4.7 Medium 2026-09-21
CVE-2026-88856 Joomla Extension - OrdaSoft.com - Authenticated, Privileged Remote Code Execution in OrdaSoft Joomla Gallery extension for Joomla < 6.2.7 — OrdaSoft Joomla Gallery free extension for Joomla 9.4 Critical 2026-09-20
CVE-2026-90817 REDCap 13.3.0+ 未授权远程代码执行漏洞 — REDCap 9.8 Critical 2026-09-20
CVE-2026-94004 DedeCMS mytag_js.php code injection — DedeCMS 7.3 High 2026-09-20
CVE-2026-93985 OpenPanel js-runtime through 2.3.0 JavaScript Template Sandbox Escape RCE — openpanel 9.9 Critical 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-85658 Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content <= 4.17.2 - Authenticated (Subscriber+) Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'eup_bio' Biography Field (Entity-Encoded Shortcode Bracket) — Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress 8.1 High 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-4327 The Welcomizer <= 2.8.1 - Missing Authorization to Authenticated (Subscriber+) Remote Code Execution via 'twiz_custom_logic' Parameter — The Welcomizer 8.8 High 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-92807 Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd <= 4.6.1 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Arbitrary Function Invocation / Code Injection via 'pdf_created_callback' Shortcode Attribute — Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd 8.8 High 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-89274 WP Recipe Maker <= 10.8.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via Recipe Comment Content — WP Recipe Maker 9.1 Critical 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-92229 Forminator Forms <= 1.57.2 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'current_url' Parameter — Forminator Forms – Contact Form, Payment Form & Custom Form Builder 9.1 Critical 2026-09-19
CVE-2026-82340 IBM Guardium Data Protection is affected by multiple vulnerabilities. — Guardium Data Protection 9.8 Critical 2026-09-18

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 2060 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.