Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1336 CNY

100%

CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) — Vulnerability Class 1738

1738 vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)). AI Chinese analysis included.

CWE-94 represents a critical code injection weakness where software constructs executable code using untrusted input without proper sanitization. Attackers typically exploit this vulnerability by injecting malicious scripts or commands into user-supplied fields, such as web forms or API parameters, which the application then executes directly. This allows adversaries to bypass security controls, steal sensitive data, or gain unauthorized administrative access to the underlying system. To prevent such exploits, developers must rigorously validate and sanitize all external inputs, ensuring that only expected characters are processed. Implementing strict allow-listing strategies, utilizing parameterized queries for database interactions, and avoiding dynamic code execution functions like eval() are essential defensive measures. By treating all user input as potentially hostile and applying robust encoding techniques, organizations can effectively neutralize injection vectors and maintain application integrity.

MITRE CWE Description
The product constructs all or part of a code segment using externally-influenced input from an upstream component, but it does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes special elements that could modify the syntax or behavior of the intended code segment.
Common Consequences (4)
Access Control Bypass Protection Mechanism
In some cases, injectable code controls authentication; this may lead to a remote vulnerability.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity
Injected code can access resources that the attacker is directly prevented from accessing.
Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands
When a product allows a user's input to contain code syntax, it might be possible for an attacker to craft the code in such a way that it will alter the intended control flow of the product. As a result, code injection can often result in the execution of arbitrary code. Code injection attacks can…
Non-Repudiation Hide Activities
Often the actions performed by injected control code are unlogged.
Mitigations (5)
Architecture and Design Refactor your program so that you do not have to dynamically generate code.
Architecture and Design Run your code in a "jail" or similar sandbox environment that enforces strict boundaries between the process and the operating system. This may effectively restrict which code can be executed by your product. Examples include the Unix chroot jail and AppArmor. In general, managed code may provide some protection. This may not be a feasible solution, and it only limits the impact to the operating s…
Implementation Assume all input is malicious. Use an "accept known good" input validation strategy, i.e., use a list of acceptable inputs that strictly conform to specifications. Reject any input that does not strictly conform to specifications, or transform it into something that does. When performing input validation, consider all potentially relevant properties, including length, type of input, the full range…
Testing Use dynamic tools and techniques that interact with the product using large test suites with many diverse inputs, such as fuzz testing (fuzzing), robustness testing, and fault injection. The product's operation may slow down, but it should not become unstable, crash, or generate incorrect results.
Operation Run the code in an environment that performs automatic taint propagation and prevents any command execution that uses tainted variables, such as Perl's "-T" switch. This will force the program to perform validation steps that remove the taint, although you must be careful to correctly validate your inputs so that you do not accidentally mark dangerous inputs as untainted (see CWE-183 and CWE-184).
Examples (2)
This example attempts to write user messages to a message file and allow users to view them.
$MessageFile = "messages.out"; if ($_GET["action"] == "NewMessage") { $name = $_GET["name"]; $message = $_GET["message"]; $handle = fopen($MessageFile, "a+"); fwrite($handle, "<b>$name</b> says '$message'<hr>\n"); fclose($handle); echo "Message Saved!<p>\n"; } else if ($_GET["action"] == "ViewMessages") { include($MessageFile); }
Bad · PHP
name=h4x0r message=%3C?php%20system(%22/bin/ls%20-l%22);?%3E
Attack
edit-config.pl: This CGI script is used to modify settings in a configuration file.
use CGI qw(:standard); sub config_file_add_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to add a field/key to a file goes here } sub config_file_set_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to set key to a particular file goes here } sub config_file_delete_key { my ($fname, $key, $arg) = @_; # code to delete key from a particular file goes here } sub handleConfigAction { my ($fname, $action) = @_; my $key = param('key'); my $val = param('val'); # this is super-efficient code, especially if you have to invoke # any one of dozens of different functions! my $code = "config_file_$action_key(\$fnam
Bad · Perl
add_key(",","); system("/bin/ls");
Attack
CVE ID Title CVSS Severity Published
CVE-2026-14691 SourceCodester Multi-Vendor Online Grocery Management System Setting SystemSettings.php update_settings_info code injection — Multi-Vendor Online Grocery Management System 6.3 Medium 2026-07-05
CVE-2026-12252 Untrusted JAR Code Execution in Multiple Stanford Interface Classes in nltk/nltk — nltk/nltk - - 2026-07-04
CVE-2026-11778 CURCY <= 2.2.14 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via 'exchange' Parameter — CURCY – Multi Currency for WooCommerce – Smoothly on WooCommerce 9.x 5.4 Medium 2026-07-03
CVE-2026-57624 WordPress Blocksy Companion Pro plugin <= 2.1.46 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Blocksy Companion Pro 10.0 Critical 2026-07-02
CVE-2026-27436 WordPress Five Star Business Profile and Schema plugin <= 2.3.19 - Arbitrary Code Execution vulnerability — Five Star Business Profile and Schema 9.1 Critical 2026-07-02
CVE-2026-54074 @tinacms/cli: Remote Code Execution via Forestry migration — unsanitised __TINA_INTERNAL__ marker in user-controlled YAML labels — tinacms 7.8 High 2026-07-01
CVE-2026-58454 JAIOTlink C492A-W6 4.8.30.57701411 RCE via /Anyka/config Endpoint — C492A-W6 Wi-Fi IP Camera 7.5 High 2026-07-01
CVE-2026-8857 Full RCE using EasyTimeline Extension — timeline - - 2026-07-01
CVE-2026-24249 NVIDIA Megatron Bridge 代码注入漏洞 — Megatron-Bridge 7.8 High 2026-07-01
CVE-2026-24248 NVIDIA Megatron Bridge 代码注入漏洞 — Megatron-Bridge 7.8 High 2026-07-01
CVE-2026-56264 Crawl4AI - Arbitrary JavaScript Execution via /execute_js Endpoint — Crawl4AI 8.1 High 2026-06-30
CVE-2026-58449 txtai - Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Unsafe Reflection in API /reindex function Parameter — txtai 9.8 Critical 2026-06-30
CVE-2026-10109 IBM® Db2® is vulnerable to remote code execution due to improper pre-auth DRDA handshake handling — Db2 9.8 Critical 2026-06-30
CVE-2026-10134 Unauthenticated Server-Side RCE via PythonCodeStructuredTool in Public Flows — Langflow OSS 10.0 Critical 2026-06-30
CVE-2026-7873 Code Injection Vulnerability in Code Validation Endpoint — Langflow OSS 9.9 Critical 2026-06-30
CVE-2026-58138 Orkes Conductor 3.21.21 < 3.30.2 Unauthenticated RCE via GraalVM Script Evaluators — conductor 9.8 Critical 2026-06-30
CVE-2026-48192 Siemens Mendix Studio Pro 代码注入漏洞 — Mendix Studio Pro 10.11 5.4 Medium 2026-06-30
CVE-2026-13749 Snowflake CLI Arbitrary Code Execution via Snowpark Annotation Processor Template Injection — Snowflake CLI 8.8 High 2026-06-29
CVE-2026-13500 antlr ANTLR4 Grammar Action Block OutputFile.java code injection — ANTLR4 7.3 High 2026-06-28
CVE-2026-53576 Kestra: Unauthenticated RCE via /configs path-suffix auth-filter bypass — kestra 10.0 Critical 2026-06-26
CVE-2026-33646 mise: Arbitrary Code Execution via Tera Templates in .tool-versions Files (Trust Bypass) — mise 9.6 Critical 2026-06-26
CVE-2026-57315 WordPress Blocksy Companion Pro plugin <= 2.1.45 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Blocksy Companion Pro 8.5 High 2026-06-26
CVE-2025-7958 Trellix NX 代码注入漏洞 — Trellix Network Security NX, EX, FX, AX, and CMS - - 2026-06-26
CVE-2026-50741 revive adserver 代码注入漏洞 — Adserver - - 2026-06-26
CVE-2026-55413 ToolJet - Marketplace Plugin Poisoning Enables Instance-Wide Remote Code Execution — ToolJet - - 2026-06-25
CVE-2026-57456 Vim: Arbitrary Code Execution via Python Omni-Completion Docstrings — vim - - 2026-06-25
CVE-2026-56049 WordPress Post Snippets plugin <= 4.0.19 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Post Snippets 8.5 High 2026-06-25
CVE-2026-54823 WordPress Widget Options plugin <= 4.2.3 - Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability — Widget Options 9.9 Critical 2026-06-25
CVE-2026-1606 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in GitLab — GitLab 4.3 Medium 2026-06-25
CVE-2026-44016 Docling: Unsafe Playwright-based HTML Rendering — docling 8.2 High 2026-06-24

Vulnerabilities classified as CWE-94 (对生成代码的控制不恰当(代码注入)) represent 1738 CVEs. The CWE taxonomy describes the weakness; review individual CVEs for product-specific impact.