Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2002-1932
Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Microsoft Windows XP and Windows 2000, when configured to send administrative alerts and the "Do not overwrite events (clear log manually)" option is set, does not notify the administrator when the log reaches its maximum size, which allows local users and remote attackers to avoid detection.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Microsoft Windows 2000/XP事件日志满未报警漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Microsoft Windows 2000/XP是微软开发的操作系统。 Microsoft Windows 2000/XP当事件日志被填满时报警处理存在问题,远程攻击者可以利用这个漏洞使得其攻击行为不被记录。 通常情况下,系统在事件日志满的时候不会覆盖日志文件自身,并停止日志,然后对系统管理员发出相关警告。但是Microsoft Windows 2000/XP系统中,当选择了'不覆盖事件(手工清除日志'选项时,事件日志在到达其允许记录的最大值时,也不会向管理员发送警告信息,造成攻击者可以利用这个漏洞伪造
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
-n/a n/a -
II. Public POCs for CVE-2002-1932
#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC
III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2002-1932
Please Login to view more intelligence information
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2002-1932

No comments yet


Leave a comment