Support Us — Your donation helps us keep running

Goal: 1000 CNY,Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2016-2922
Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
IBM Rational ClearQuest 8.0 through 8.0.1.9 and 9.0 through 9.0.1.3 (CQ OSLC linkages, EmailRelay) fails to check the SSL certificate against the requested hostname. It is subject to a man-in-the-middle attack with an impersonating server observing all the data transmitted to the real server. IBM X-Force ID: 113353.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
IBM Rational ClearQuest 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
IBM Rational ClearQuest是美国IBM公司的一套应用程序生命周期管理 (ALM) 软件。该软件为应用程序提供缺陷跟踪、流程定制、实时报告等,从而提高开发周期的可视性和可控性。 IBM Rational ClearQuest(Web/CQ OSLC server/CM Server和EmailRelay组件)中存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于程序未能检查SSL证书中被请求的主机名。攻击者可借助伪造的服务器利用该漏洞实施中间人攻击。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
IBMRational ClearQuest 8.0 -
II. Public POCs for CVE-2016-2922
#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC
III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2016-2922
Please Login to view more intelligence information
New Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2016-2922

No comments yet


Leave a comment