Support Us — Your donation helps us keep running

Goal: 1000 CNY,Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2017-16548
Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
The receive_xattr function in xattrs.c in rsync 3.1.2 and 3.1.3-development does not check for a trailing '\0' character in an xattr name, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap-based buffer over-read and application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact by sending crafted data to the daemon.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
rsync 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
rsync是澳大利亚软件开发者安德鲁-垂鸠(Andrew Tridgell)和保罗-麦可拉斯(Paul Mackerras)共同研发的一套用于类Unix系统中的数据镜像备份应用程序,它能够同步更新两处计算机的文件与目录,并利用差分编码减少数据传输。 rsync 3.1.2版本和3.1.3-development版本中的xattrs.c文件的‘receive_xattr’函数存在安全漏洞。远程攻击者可通过向守护进程发送特制的数据利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(基于堆的缓冲区越边界读取和应用程序崩溃)。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
-n/a n/a -
II. Public POCs for CVE-2017-16548
#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC
III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2017-16548
Please Login to view more intelligence information
New Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2017-16548

No comments yet


Leave a comment