Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1000 CNY

100.0%
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilitiesLog in to subscribe
I. Basic Information for CVE-2017-9224
Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
An issue was discovered in Oniguruma 6.2.0, as used in Oniguruma-mod in Ruby through 2.4.1 and mbstring in PHP through 7.1.5. A stack out-of-bounds read occurs in match_at() during regular expression searching. A logical error involving order of validation and access in match_at() could result in an out-of-bounds read from a stack buffer.
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: NVD (National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Title
Oniguruma 缓冲区错误漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Oniguruma是一款开源的正则表达式库。 Oniguruma 6.2.0版本存在缓冲区错误漏洞。该漏洞源于在 Ruby 中的 Oniguruma-mod 到 2.4.1 和 PHP 中的 mbstring 到 7.1.5 中使用。 在正则表达式搜索期间,match_at() 中发生堆栈越界读取。 match_at() 中涉及验证和访问顺序的逻辑错误可能导致从堆栈缓冲区读取越界。攻击者可利用该漏洞造成拒绝服务(栈越边界读取)。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Affected Products
VendorProductAffected VersionsCPESubscribe
-n/a n/a -
II. Public POCs for CVE-2017-9224
#POC DescriptionSource LinkShenlong Link
AI-Generated POCPremium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC
III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2017-9224
Please Login to view more intelligence information
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2017-9224

No comments yet


Leave a comment