Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2024-26629— nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER

Quick assessment

Affected
Linux Linux
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于nfsd4_release_lockowner()存在安全漏洞。

AI Predicted 5.3 Difficulty: Moderate EPSS 0.20% · P9

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1 AI

T1068 · Exploitation for Privilege Escalation

Affected Version Matrix 29

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Linux Linux ef481b262bba4f454351eec43f024fec942c2d4c< 10d75984495f7fe62152c3b0dbfa3f0a6b739c9b affected
3097f38e91266c7132c3fdb7e778fac858c00670< 99fb654d01dc3f08b5905c663ad6c89a9d83302f affected
e2fc17fcc503cfca57b5d1dd3b646ca7eebead97< c6f8b3fcc62725e4129f2c0fd550d022d4a7685a affected
ce3c4ad7f4ce5db7b4f08a1e237d8dd94b39180b< e4cf8941664cae2f89f0189c29fe2ce8c6be0d03 affected
ce3c4ad7f4ce5db7b4f08a1e237d8dd94b39180b< b7d2eee1f53899b53f069bba3a59a419fc3d331b affected
ce3c4ad7f4ce5db7b4f08a1e237d8dd94b39180b< 8f5b860de87039b007e84a28a5eefc888154e098 affected
ce3c4ad7f4ce5db7b4f08a1e237d8dd94b39180b< edcf9725150e42beeca42d085149f4c88fa97afd affected
fea1d0940301378206955264a01778700fc9c16f affected
… +21 more rows
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2024-26629

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: fix RELEASE_LOCKOWNER The test on so_count in nfsd4_release_lockowner() is nonsense and harmful. Revert to using check_for_locks(), changing that to not sleep. First: harmful. As is documented in the kdoc comment for nfsd4_release_lockowner(), the test on so_count can transiently return a false positive resulting in a return of NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD when in fact no locks are held. This is clearly a protocol violation and with the Linux NFS client it can cause incorrect behaviour. If RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is sent while some other thread is still processing a LOCK request which failed because, at the time that request was received, the given owner held a conflicting lock, then the nfsd thread processing that LOCK request can hold a reference (conflock) to the lock owner that causes nfsd4_release_lockowner() to return an incorrect error. The Linux NFS client ignores that NFS4ERR_LOCKS_HELD error because it never sends NFS4_RELEASE_LOCKOWNER without first releasing any locks, so it knows that the error is impossible. It assumes the lock owner was in fact released so it feels free to use the same lock owner identifier in some later locking request. When it does reuse a lock owner identifier for which a previous RELEASE failed, it will naturally use a lock_seqid of zero. However the server, which didn't release the lock owner, will expect a larger lock_seqid and so will respond with NFS4ERR_BAD_SEQID. So clearly it is harmful to allow a false positive, which testing so_count allows. The test is nonsense because ... well... it doesn't mean anything. so_count is the sum of three different counts. 1/ the set of states listed on so_stateids 2/ the set of active vfs locks owned by any of those states 3/ various transient counts such as for conflicting locks. When it is tested against '2' it is clear that one of these is the transient reference obtained by find_lockowner_str_locked(). It is not clear what the other one is expected to be. In practice, the count is often 2 because there is precisely one state on so_stateids. If there were more, this would fail. In my testing I see two circumstances when RELEASE_LOCKOWNER is called. In one case, CLOSE is called before RELEASE_LOCKOWNER. That results in all the lock states being removed, and so the lockowner being discarded (it is removed when there are no more references which usually happens when the lock state is discarded). When nfsd4_release_lockowner() finds that the lock owner doesn't exist, it returns success. The other case shows an so_count of '2' and precisely one state listed in so_stateid. It appears that the Linux client uses a separate lock owner for each file resulting in one lock state per lock owner, so this test on '2' is safe. For another client it might not be safe. So this patch changes check_for_locks() to use the (newish) find_any_file_locked() so that it doesn't take a reference on the nfs4_file and so never calls nfsd_file_put(), and so never sleeps. With this check is it safe to restore the use of check_for_locks() rather than testing so_count against the mysterious '2'.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于nfsd4_release_lockowner()存在安全漏洞。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Linux Linux ef481b262bba4f454351eec43f024fec942c2d4c ~ 10d75984495f7fe62152c3b0dbfa3f0a6b739c9b -
Linux Linux 5.19 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2024-26629

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2024-26629

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Mailing List Discussions for CVE-2024-26629 (3)

Other References for CVE-2024-26629 (5)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2024-03-13 · 3 CVEs total

CVE-2024-26630 7.1 HIGH mm: cachestat: fix folio read-after-free in cache walk
CVE-2023-52608 firmware: arm_scmi: Check mailbox/SMT channel for consistency

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2024-26629

No comments yet


Leave a comment