目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%

CVE-2024-26837— Linux kernel 安全漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Linux Linux
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞。目前尚无此漏洞的相关信息,请随时关注CNNVD或厂商公告。

AI 预测 5.3 利用难度: 中等 EPSS 0.17% · P5

影响版本矩阵 10

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Linux Linux 4f2673b3a2b6246729a1ff13b8945a040839dbd3< 2d5b4b3376fa146a23917b8577064906d643925f affected
4f2673b3a2b6246729a1ff13b8945a040839dbd3< 603be95437e7fd85ba694e75918067fb9e7754db affected
4f2673b3a2b6246729a1ff13b8945a040839dbd3< e0b4c5b1d760008f1dd18c07c35af0442e54f9c8 affected
4f2673b3a2b6246729a1ff13b8945a040839dbd3< dc489f86257cab5056e747344f17a164f63bff4b affected
5.13 affected
< 5.13 unaffected
6.1.80≤ 6.1.* unaffected
6.6.19≤ 6.6.* unaffected
… +2 条更多
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2024-26837 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
net: bridge: switchdev: Skip MDB replays of deferred events on offload
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: bridge: switchdev: Skip MDB replays of deferred events on offload Before this change, generation of the list of MDB events to replay would race against the creation of new group memberships, either from the IGMP/MLD snooping logic or from user configuration. While new memberships are immediately visible to walkers of br->mdb_list, the notification of their existence to switchdev event subscribers is deferred until a later point in time. So if a replay list was generated during a time that overlapped with such a window, it would also contain a replay of the not-yet-delivered event. The driver would thus receive two copies of what the bridge internally considered to be one single event. On destruction of the bridge, only a single membership deletion event was therefore sent. As a consequence of this, drivers which reference count memberships (at least DSA), would be left with orphan groups in their hardware database when the bridge was destroyed. This is only an issue when replaying additions. While deletion events may still be pending on the deferred queue, they will already have been removed from br->mdb_list, so no duplicates can be generated in that scenario. To a user this meant that old group memberships, from a bridge in which a port was previously attached, could be reanimated (in hardware) when the port joined a new bridge, without the new bridge's knowledge. For example, on an mv88e6xxx system, create a snooping bridge and immediately add a port to it: root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ ip link add dev br0 up type bridge mcast_snooping 1 && \ > ip link set dev x3 up master br0 And then destroy the bridge: root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ ip link del dev br0 root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ mvls atu ADDRESS FID STATE Q F 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a DEV:0 Marvell 88E6393X 33:33:00:00:00:6a 1 static - - 0 . . . . . . . . . . 33:33:ff:87:e4:3f 1 static - - 0 . . . . . . . . . . ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 1 static - - 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ The two IPv6 groups remain in the hardware database because the port (x3) is notified of the host's membership twice: once via the original event and once via a replay. Since only a single delete notification is sent, the count remains at 1 when the bridge is destroyed. Then add the same port (or another port belonging to the same hardware domain) to a new bridge, this time with snooping disabled: root@infix-06-0b-00:~$ ip link add dev br1 up type bridge mcast_snooping 0 && \ > ip link set dev x3 up master br1 All multicast, including the two IPv6 groups from br0, should now be flooded, according to the policy of br1. But instead the old memberships are still active in the hardware database, causing the switch to only forward traffic to those groups towards the CPU (port 0). Eliminate the race in two steps: 1. Grab the write-side lock of the MDB while generating the replay list. This prevents new memberships from showing up while we are generating the replay list. But it leaves the scenario in which a deferred event was already generated, but not delivered, before we grabbed the lock. Therefore: 2. Make sure that no deferred version of a replay event is already enqueued to the switchdev deferred queue, before adding it to the replay list, when replaying additions.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞。目前尚无此漏洞的相关信息,请随时关注CNNVD或厂商公告。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Linux Linux 4f2673b3a2b6246729a1ff13b8945a040839dbd3 ~ 2d5b4b3376fa146a23917b8577064906d643925f -
Linux Linux 5.13 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2024-26837 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2024-26837 的情报信息

请登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2024-26837 其他参考 (3)

同批安全公告 · Linux · 2024-04-17 · 共 100 条

CVE-2024-26853 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26877 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26828 9.4 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26856 8.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26822 8.7 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26830 8.4 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26883 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26872 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26824 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26870 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26823 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26869 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26911 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26838 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26865 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26864 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26890 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26895 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26898 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-26852 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞

显示前 20 条,共 100 条。 查看全部 &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2024-26837

暂无评论


发表评论