目標達成 すべての支援者に感謝 — 100%達成しました!

目標: 1000 CNY · 調達済み: 1336 CNY

100%

CVE-2024-35875— Linux kernel 安全漏洞

CVSS 8.4 · High EPSS 0.25% · P17

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1AI

T1498 · Network Denial of Service

Affected Version Matrix 10

ベンダープロダクトVersion Rangeステータス
LinuxLinuxd8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df< 22943e4fe4b3a2dcbadc3d38d5bf840bbdbfe374affected
d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df< 453b5f2dec276c1bb4ea078bf8c0da57ee4627e5affected
d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df< 08044b08b37528b82f70a87576c692b4e4b7716eaffected
d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df< 99485c4c026f024e7cb82da84c7951dbe3deb584affected
4.15affected
< 4.15unaffected
6.1.85≤ 6.1.*unaffected
6.6.26≤ 6.6.*unaffected
… +2 more rows
新しい脆弱性情報の通知を購読するログインして購読

I. CVE-2024-35875の基本情報

脆弱性情報

脆弱性についてご質問がありますか?Shenlongの分析が参考になるかご確認ください!
Shenlongの10の質問を表示 ↗

高度な大規模言語モデル技術を使用していますが、出力には不正確または古い情報が含まれる可能性があります。Shenlongはデータの正確性を確保するよう努めていますが、実際の状況に基づいて検証・判断してください。

脆弱性タイトル
x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems
ソース: CVE Program / CVE List V5
脆弱性説明
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/coco: Require seeding RNG with RDRAND on CoCo systems There are few uses of CoCo that don't rely on working cryptography and hence a working RNG. Unfortunately, the CoCo threat model means that the VM host cannot be trusted and may actively work against guests to extract secrets or manipulate computation. Since a malicious host can modify or observe nearly all inputs to guests, the only remaining source of entropy for CoCo guests is RDRAND. If RDRAND is broken -- due to CPU hardware fault -- the RNG as a whole is meant to gracefully continue on gathering entropy from other sources, but since there aren't other sources on CoCo, this is catastrophic. This is mostly a concern at boot time when initially seeding the RNG, as after that the consequences of a broken RDRAND are much more theoretical. So, try at boot to seed the RNG using 256 bits of RDRAND output. If this fails, panic(). This will also trigger if the system is booted without RDRAND, as RDRAND is essential for a safe CoCo boot. Add this deliberately to be "just a CoCo x86 driver feature" and not part of the RNG itself. Many device drivers and platforms have some desire to contribute something to the RNG, and add_device_randomness() is specifically meant for this purpose. Any driver can call it with seed data of any quality, or even garbage quality, and it can only possibly make the quality of the RNG better or have no effect, but can never make it worse. Rather than trying to build something into the core of the RNG, consider the particular CoCo issue just a CoCo issue, and therefore separate it all out into driver (well, arch/platform) code. [ bp: Massage commit message. ]
ソース: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS情報
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
ソース: CVE Program / CVE List V5
脆弱性タイプ
N/A
ソース: CVE Program / CVE List V5
脆弱性タイトル
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性説明
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel 存在安全漏洞。目前尚无此漏洞的相关信息,请随时关注CNNVD或厂商公告。
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS情報
N/A
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
脆弱性タイプ
N/A
ソース: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

影響を受ける製品

ベンダープロダクト影響を受けるバージョンCPE購読
LinuxLinux d8aa7eea78a1401cce39b3bb61ead0150044a3df ~ 22943e4fe4b3a2dcbadc3d38d5bf840bbdbfe374 -
LinuxLinux 4.15 -

II. CVE-2024-35875の公開POC

#POC説明ソースリンクShenlongリンク
AI生成POCプレミアム

公開POCは見つかりませんでした。

ログインしてAI POCを生成

III. CVE-2024-35875のインテリジェンス情報

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2024-35875 其他参考 (4)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2024-05-19 · 82 CVEs total

CVE-2024-358619.8 CRITICALsmb: client: fix potential UAF in cifs_signal_cifsd_for_reconnect()
CVE-2024-358629.8 CRITICALsmb: client: fix potential UAF in smb2_is_network_name_deleted()
CVE-2024-358639.8 CRITICALsmb: client: fix potential UAF in is_valid_oplock_break()
CVE-2024-358649.8 CRITICALsmb: client: fix potential UAF in smb2_is_valid_lease_break()
CVE-2024-358659.8 CRITICALsmb: client: fix potential UAF in smb2_is_valid_oplock_break()
CVE-2024-358849.8 CRITICALudp: do not accept non-tunnel GSO skbs landing in a tunnel
CVE-2024-358709.8 CRITICALsmb: client: fix UAF in smb2_reconnect_server()
CVE-2024-358699.8 CRITICALsmb: client: guarantee refcounted children from parent session
CVE-2024-359399.3 CRITICALdma-direct: Leak pages on dma_set_decrypted() failure
CVE-2024-358878.8 HIGHax25: fix use-after-free bugs caused by ax25_ds_del_timer
CVE-2024-359158.8 HIGHnfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet
CVE-2024-358898.6 HIGHidpf: fix kernel panic on unknown packet types
CVE-2024-359378.1 HIGHwifi: cfg80211: check A-MSDU format more carefully
CVE-2024-359107.8 HIGHtcp: properly terminate timers for kernel sockets
CVE-2024-359217.8 HIGHmedia: mediatek: vcodec: Fix oops when HEVC init fails
CVE-2024-359057.8 HIGHbpf: Protect against int overflow for stack access size
CVE-2024-358907.8 HIGHgro: fix ownership transfer
CVE-2024-359197.8 HIGHmedia: mediatek: vcodec: adding lock to protect encoder context list
CVE-2024-359207.8 HIGHmedia: mediatek: vcodec: adding lock to protect decoder context list
CVE-2024-358947.8 HIGHmptcp: prevent BPF accessing lowat from a subflow socket.

Showing 20 of 82 CVEs. View all on vendor page →

IV. 関連脆弱性

V. CVE-2024-35875へのコメント

まだコメントはありません


コメントを残す