目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1359 元

100%

CVE-2024-53079— Linux kernel 安全漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Linux Linux
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于存在延迟分割队列命名和锁定问题。

CVSS 7.8 · High EPSS 0.18% · P7

可能的 ATT&CK 技术 1 AI

T1055 · Process Injection

影响版本矩阵 8

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Linux Linux 87eaceb3faa59b9b4d940ec9554ce251325d83fe< fc4951c3e3358dd82ea508e893695b916c813f17 affected
87eaceb3faa59b9b4d940ec9554ce251325d83fe< afb1352d06b1b6b2cfd1f901c766a430c87078b3 affected
87eaceb3faa59b9b4d940ec9554ce251325d83fe< f8f931bba0f92052cf842b7e30917b1afcc77d5a affected
5.4 affected
< 5.4 unaffected
6.6.62≤ 6.6.* unaffected
6.11.8≤ 6.11.* unaffected
6.12≤ * unaffected
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2024-53079 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/thp: fix deferred split unqueue naming and locking Recent changes are putting more pressure on THP deferred split queues: under load revealing long-standing races, causing list_del corruptions, "Bad page state"s and worse (I keep BUGs in both of those, so usually don't get to see how badly they end up without). The relevant recent changes being 6.8's mTHP, 6.10's mTHP swapout, and 6.12's mTHP swapin, improved swap allocation, and underused THP splitting. Before fixing locking: rename misleading folio_undo_large_rmappable(), which does not undo large_rmappable, to folio_unqueue_deferred_split(), which is what it does. But that and its out-of-line __callee are mm internals of very limited usability: add comment and WARN_ON_ONCEs to check usage; and return a bool to say if a deferred split was unqueued, which can then be used in WARN_ON_ONCEs around safety checks (sparing callers the arcane conditionals in __folio_unqueue_deferred_split()). Just omit the folio_unqueue_deferred_split() from free_unref_folios(), all of whose callers now call it beforehand (and if any forget then bad_page() will tell) - except for its caller put_pages_list(), which itself no longer has any callers (and will be deleted separately). Swapout: mem_cgroup_swapout() has been resetting folio->memcg_data 0 without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from deferred split list; which is unfortunate, since the split_queue_lock depends on the memcg (when memcg is enabled); so swapout has been unqueueing such THPs later, when freeing the folio, using the pgdat's lock instead: potentially corrupting the memcg's list. __remove_mapping() has frozen refcount to 0 here, so no problem with calling folio_unqueue_deferred_split() before resetting memcg_data. That goes back to 5.4 commit 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware"): which included a check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue, but no check on deferred queue before adding THP to swapcache. That worked fine with the usual sequence of events in reclaim (though there were a couple of rare ways in which a THP on deferred queue could have been swapped out), but 6.12 commit dafff3f4c850 ("mm: split underused THPs") avoids splitting underused THPs in reclaim, which makes swapcache THPs on deferred queue commonplace. Keep the check on swapcache before adding to deferred queue? Yes: it is no longer essential, but preserves the existing behaviour, and is likely to be a worthwhile optimization (vmstat showed much more traffic on the queue under swapping load if the check was removed); update its comment. Memcg-v1 move (deprecated): mem_cgroup_move_account() has been changing folio->memcg_data without checking and unqueueing a THP folio from the deferred list, sometimes corrupting "from" memcg's list, like swapout. Refcount is non-zero here, so folio_unqueue_deferred_split() can only be used in a WARN_ON_ONCE to validate the fix, which must be done earlier: mem_cgroup_move_charge_pte_range() first try to split the THP (splitting of course unqueues), or skip it if that fails. Not ideal, but moving charge has been requested, and khugepaged should repair the THP later: nobody wants new custom unqueueing code just for this deprecated case. The 87eaceb3faa5 commit did have the code to move from one deferred list to another (but was not conscious of its unsafety while refcount non-0); but that was removed by 5.6 commit fac0516b5534 ("mm: thp: don't need care deferred split queue in memcg charge move path"), which argued that the existence of a PMD mapping guarantees that the THP cannot be on a deferred list. As above, false in rare cases, and now commonly false. Backport to 6.11 should be straightforward. Earlier backports must take care that other _deferred_list fixes and dependencies are included. There is not a strong case for backports, but they can fix cornercases.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于存在延迟分割队列命名和锁定问题。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Linux Linux 87eaceb3faa59b9b4d940ec9554ce251325d83fe ~ fc4951c3e3358dd82ea508e893695b916c813f17 -
Linux Linux 5.4 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2024-53079 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2024-53079 的情报信息

请登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2024-53079 补丁与修复 (3)

同批安全公告 · Linux · 2024-11-19 · 共 88 条

CVE-2024-50283 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50276 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53066 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50286 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53058 9.4 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53082 8.4 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50299 8.2 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53057 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50300 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50264 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53044 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53076 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53080 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53088 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-53063 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50301 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50294 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50293 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50291 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-50288 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞

显示前 20 条,共 88 条。 查看全部 &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2024-53079

匿名用户
2026-06-25 15:22:28

Just here to explore discussions, exchange ideas, and learn something new along the way. I like learning from different perspectives and sharing my input when it's helpful. Always open to new ideas and building connections. Here is my web-site:<a href="https://automisto24.com.ua/">AutoMisto24</a> https://automisto24.com.ua/


发表评论