目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CVE-2025-21674— Linux kernel 安全漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Linux Linux
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于mlx5e_xfrm_add_state和mlx5e_xfrm_del_state函数中对软中断(SOFTIRQ)安全锁的使用不当,导致在启用IPsec隧道模式时出现锁依赖冲突,可能引发系统崩溃。

AI 预测 6.5 利用难度: 中等 EPSS 0.18% · P7

影响版本矩阵 8

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Linux Linux 4c24272b4e2befca6ad1409c3c9aaa16c24b1099< 87c4417a902151cfe4363166245a3671a08c256c affected
4c24272b4e2befca6ad1409c3c9aaa16c24b1099< 6d3d69c070d920fbb146d73dd3899a50f25d0901 affected
4c24272b4e2befca6ad1409c3c9aaa16c24b1099< 2c3688090f8a1f085230aa839cc63e4a7b977df0 affected
6.4 affected
< 6.4 unaffected
6.6.74≤ 6.6.* unaffected
6.12.11≤ 6.12.* unaffected
6.13≤ * unaffected
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2025-21674 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
net/mlx5e: Fix inversion dependency warning while enabling IPsec tunnel
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/mlx5e: Fix inversion dependency warning while enabling IPsec tunnel Attempt to enable IPsec packet offload in tunnel mode in debug kernel generates the following kernel panic, which is happening due to two issues: 1. In SA add section, the should be _bh() variant when marking SA mode. 2. There is not needed flush_workqueue in SA delete routine. It is not needed as at this stage as it is removed from SADB and the running work will be canceled later in SA free. ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.12.0+ #4 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- charon/1337 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire: ffff88810f365020 (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] and this task is already holding: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 which would create a new lock dependency: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); local_irq_disable(); lock(&x->lock); lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); <Interrupt> lock(&x->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by charon/1337: #0: ffffffff87f8f858 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x5e/0x90 #1: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock: -> (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ops: 29 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 ---truncated---
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于mlx5e_xfrm_add_state和mlx5e_xfrm_del_state函数中对软中断(SOFTIRQ)安全锁的使用不当,导致在启用IPsec隧道模式时出现锁依赖冲突,可能引发系统崩溃。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Linux Linux 4c24272b4e2befca6ad1409c3c9aaa16c24b1099 ~ 87c4417a902151cfe4363166245a3671a08c256c -
Linux Linux 6.4 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2025-21674 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2025-21674 的情报信息

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2025-21674 补丁与修复 (3)

同批安全公告 · Linux · 2025-01-31 · 共 20 条

CVE-2025-21673 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 资源管理错误漏洞
CVE-2025-21669 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2025-21680 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 输入验证错误漏洞
CVE-2025-21678 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2025-21677 7.8 HIGH Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2025-21676 7.5 HIGH Linux kernel 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2025-21682 7.3 HIGH Linux kernel 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2025-21679 Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2025-21675 Linux kernel 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2025-21681 Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2025-21672 Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2025-21671 Linux kernel 资源管理错误漏洞
CVE-2025-21670 Linux kernel 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2025-21683 Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2025-21668 Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2025-21667 Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2025-21666 Linux kernel 代码问题漏洞
CVE-2025-21665 Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2024-57948 Linux kernel 安全漏洞

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2025-21674

暂无评论


发表评论