目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1000

100.0%
获取后续新漏洞提醒登录后订阅
一、 漏洞 CVE-2025-38349 基础信息
漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
eventpoll: don't decrement ep refcount while still holding the ep mutex
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: eventpoll: don't decrement ep refcount while still holding the ep mutex Jann Horn points out that epoll is decrementing the ep refcount and then doing a mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx); afterwards. That's very wrong, because it can lead to a use-after-free. That pattern is actually fine for the very last reference, because the code in question will delay the actual call to "ep_free(ep)" until after it has unlocked the mutex. But it's wrong for the much subtler "next to last" case when somebody *else* may also be dropping their reference and free the ep while we're still using the mutex. Note that this is true even if that other user is also using the same ep mutex: mutexes, unlike spinlocks, can not be used for object ownership, even if they guarantee mutual exclusion. A mutex "unlock" operation is not atomic, and as one user is still accessing the mutex as part of unlocking it, another user can come in and get the now released mutex and free the data structure while the first user is still cleaning up. See our mutex documentation in Documentation/locking/mutex-design.rst, in particular the section [1] about semantics: "mutex_unlock() may access the mutex structure even after it has internally released the lock already - so it's not safe for another context to acquire the mutex and assume that the mutex_unlock() context is not using the structure anymore" So if we drop our ep ref before the mutex unlock, but we weren't the last one, we may then unlock the mutex, another user comes in, drops _their_ reference and releases the 'ep' as it now has no users - all while the mutex_unlock() is still accessing it. Fix this by simply moving the ep refcount dropping to outside the mutex: the refcount itself is atomic, and doesn't need mutex protection (that's the whole _point_ of refcounts: unlike mutexes, they are inherently about object lifetimes).
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于epoll引用计数递减不当,可能导致释放后重用。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
受影响产品
厂商产品影响版本CPE订阅
LinuxLinux 58c9b016e12855286370dfb704c08498edbc857a ~ 521e9ff0b67c66a17d6f9593dfccafaa984aae4c -
LinuxLinux 6.4 -
二、漏洞 CVE-2025-38349 的公开POC
#POC 描述源链接神龙链接
AI 生成 POC高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC
三、漏洞 CVE-2025-38349 的情报信息
Please 登录 to view more intelligence information
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2025-38349

暂无评论


发表评论