Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2025-39748— bpf: Forget ranges when refining tnum after JSET

Quick assessment

Affected
Linux Linux
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于边界检查不当,可能导致寄存器边界不一致。

AI Predicted 5.5 Difficulty: Theoretical EPSS 0.17% · P6

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1 AI

T1068 · Exploitation for Privilege Escalation

Affected Version Matrix 18

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Linux Linux 960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84< 22191359f8454b0be082c3b126f86bcbea0f1318 affected
960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84< c29dd8336236a4deb75596b52d2dd16ccc4a380d affected
960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84< 591c788d16046edb0220800bf1819554af5853ce affected
960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84< 0643aa2468192a4d81326e8e76543854870b1ee2 affected
960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84< f01e06930444cab289a8783017af9b64255bd103 affected
960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84< 2fd0c26bacd90ef26522bd3169000a4715bf151f affected
960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84< 80a6b11862a7cfdf691e8f9faee89cfea219f098 affected
960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84< 6279846b9b2532e1b04559ef8bd0dec049f29383 affected
… +10 more rows
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2025-39748

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
bpf: Forget ranges when refining tnum after JSET
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Forget ranges when refining tnum after JSET Syzbot reported a kernel warning due to a range invariant violation on the following BPF program. 0: call bpf_get_netns_cookie 1: if r0 == 0 goto <exit> 2: if r0 & Oxffffffff goto <exit> The issue is on the path where we fall through both jumps. That path is unreachable at runtime: after insn 1, we know r0 != 0, but with the sign extension on the jset, we would only fallthrough insn 2 if r0 == 0. Unfortunately, is_branch_taken() isn't currently able to figure this out, so the verifier walks all branches. The verifier then refines the register bounds using the second condition and we end up with inconsistent bounds on this unreachable path: 1: if r0 == 0 goto <exit> r0: u64=[0x1, 0xffffffffffffffff] var_off=(0, 0xffffffffffffffff) 2: if r0 & 0xffffffff goto <exit> r0 before reg_bounds_sync: u64=[0x1, 0xffffffffffffffff] var_off=(0, 0) r0 after reg_bounds_sync: u64=[0x1, 0] var_off=(0, 0) Improving the range refinement for JSET to cover all cases is tricky. We also don't expect many users to rely on JSET given LLVM doesn't generate those instructions. So instead of improving the range refinement for JSETs, Eduard suggested we forget the ranges whenever we're narrowing tnums after a JSET. This patch implements that approach.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于边界检查不当,可能导致寄存器边界不一致。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Linux Linux 960ea056561a08e2b837b2f02d22c53226414a84 ~ 22191359f8454b0be082c3b126f86bcbea0f1318 -
Linux Linux 5.0 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2025-39748

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2025-39748

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2025-39748 (2)

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2025-09-11 · 54 CVEs total

CVE-2025-39758 9.8 CRITICAL RDMA/siw: Fix the sendmsg byte count in siw_tcp_sendpages
CVE-2025-39761 8.8 HIGH wifi: ath12k: Decrement TID on RX peer frag setup error handling
CVE-2025-39750 8.8 HIGH wifi: ath12k: Correct tid cleanup when tid setup fails
CVE-2025-39790 8.4 HIGH bus: mhi: host: Detect events pointing to unexpected TREs
CVE-2025-39779 7.8 HIGH btrfs: subpage: keep TOWRITE tag until folio is cleaned
CVE-2025-39791 7.8 HIGH dm: dm-crypt: Do not partially accept write BIOs with zoned targets
CVE-2025-39780 7.8 HIGH sched/ext: Fix invalid task state transitions on class switch
CVE-2025-39785 7.8 HIGH drm/hisilicon/hibmc: fix irq_request()'s irq name variable is local
CVE-2025-39786 7.8 HIGH iio: adc: ad7173: fix channels index for syscalib_mode
CVE-2025-39787 7.8 HIGH soc: qcom: mdt_loader: Ensure we don't read past the ELF header
CVE-2025-39740 7.8 HIGH drm/xe/migrate: prevent potential UAF
CVE-2025-39770 7.5 HIGH net: gso: Forbid IPv6 TSO with extensions on devices with only IPV6_CSUM
CVE-2025-39738 7.3 HIGH btrfs: do not allow relocation of partially dropped subvolumes
CVE-2025-39789 7.3 HIGH crypto: x86/aegis - Add missing error checks
CVE-2025-39776 7.0 HIGH mm/debug_vm_pgtable: clear page table entries at destroy_args()
CVE-2025-39764 netfilter: ctnetlink: remove refcounting in expectation dumpers
CVE-2025-39768 net/mlx5: HWS, fix complex rules rehash error flow
CVE-2025-39773 net: bridge: fix soft lockup in br_multicast_query_expired()
CVE-2025-39772 drm/hisilicon/hibmc: fix the hibmc loaded failed bug
CVE-2025-39769 bnxt_en: Fix lockdep warning during rmmod

Showing top 20 of 54 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2025-39748

No comments yet


Leave a comment