Apache PLC4X 的 Java 实现(PLC4J)中存在“使用过大尺寸值进行内存分配”、“无限制地分配资源”以及“不受控制的递归”等缺陷,允许恶意设备或伪装成合法设备的攻击者耗尽客户端应用的内存或栈空间,从而导致拒绝服务(DoS)攻击。 在 OPC UA 驱动中,这些缺陷可在身份验证之前被触发:相关数据是在建立安全通道和会话过程中、且服务器身份尚未与其绑定时即被解析的。因此,即使配置了受信任的服务器,也无法防止能够伪装该服务器的攻击者利用此漏洞。 具体缺陷如下: 在长度前缀字节串中,系统先根据网络传输中声明
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache PLC4X | 0.10.0 ~ 1.0.0 | - |
|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache PLC4X | 0.10.0 ~ 1.0.0 | - |
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-102508 | 9.2 CRITICAL | Apache PLC4X: OPC UA secure channel: integrity bypass, unverifiable server certificate, an |
| CVE-2026-94053 | 9.1 CRITICAL | Apache MINA SSHD: LDAP injection in sshd-ldap |
| CVE-2026-94052 | 9.1 CRITICAL | Apache MINA SSHD: LDAP password authentication ineffective |
| CVE-2026-77185 | 9.1 CRITICAL | Apache MINA SSHD: Asynchronous authentication can bypass signature verification |
| CVE-2026-102510 | 8.7 HIGH | Apache PLC4X: Go binding: unbounded allocation and framing failures on wire-controlled len |
| CVE-2026-102511 | 8.5 HIGH | Apache PLC4X, Apache PLC4X, Apache PLC4X, Apache PLC4X: ADS discovery accepts spoofed resp |
| CVE-2026-93994 | 8.1 HIGH | Apache MINA SSHD: Repeated-publickey policy bypass on server |
| CVE-2026-94002 | 7.5 HIGH | Apache MINA SSHD: Memory exhaustion in SFTP client via unsolicited SFTP replies |
| CVE-2026-93995 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Apache MINA SSHD: Remote execution of JGit "archive -o=file.zip" can write file on the ser |
| CVE-2026-93996 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Apache MINA SSHD: Memory exhaustion DoS via unbounded SCP command line read |
| CVE-2026-94029 | 6.5 MEDIUM | Apache MINA SSHD: Memory exhaustion in SFTP v6 check-file-name/check-file-handle extension |
| CVE-2026-88920 | Apache WSS4J: SAML Sender-Vouches Authentication Bypass | |
| CVE-2026-87830 | Apache WSS4J: Streaming WS-SecurityPolicy validation may skip element-protection checks. | |
| CVE-2026-85532 | Apache WSS4J: Insufficient Validation of Derived-Key Parameters | |
| CVE-2026-89238 | Apache WSS4J: WSS4J EncryptedHeader child confusion causing wrong protected-header selecti | |
| CVE-2026-95616 | Apache WSS4J: Unauthenticated denial of service via integer overflow in DER parsing of X.5 | |
| CVE-2026-92121 | Apache WSS4J: WS-SecurityPolicy signature checks skipped in the streaming code after an ST | |
| CVE-2026-92899 | Apache WSS4J: UsernameToken replay protection bypassed by re-encoding the Nonce |
No comments yet