CVE-2026-15780— WP Statistics <=14.16.8 未授权存储型XSS漏洞
影响版本矩阵 1
| 厂商 | 产品 | 版本范围 | 状态 |
|---|---|---|---|
| veronalabs | WP Statistics – Simple, privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternative | ≤ 14.16.8 | affected |
获取后续新漏洞提醒登录后订阅
一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-15780 基础信息
漏洞信息
对漏洞内容有疑问？看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助！
查看神龙十问 ↗ 尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术，但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性，但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。
Vulnerability Title
WP Statistics <= 14.16.8 - Unauthenticated Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'utm_campaign' Parameter
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
The WP Statistics – Simple, privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternative plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'utm_campaign' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 14.16.8 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The payload can be planted without authentication via the public /wp-statistics/v2/hit REST endpoint, because the required signature is exposed on the public homepage and a base64-encoded page_uri POST parameter overrides the previously sanitized REQUEST_URI, allowing the malicious utm_campaign value to bypass sanitization and be stored in the database.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
在Web页面生成时对输入的转义处理不恰当(跨站脚本)
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
受影响产品
| 厂商 | 产品 | 影响版本 | CPE | 订阅 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| veronalabs | WP Statistics – Simple, privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternative | 0 ~ 14.16.8 | - |
二、漏洞 CVE-2026-15780 的公开POC
| # | POC 描述 | 源链接 | 神龙链接 |
|---|
AI 生成 POC已实测靶场 高级
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B · 5999 chars
Pro+ 专属包含：
漏洞复现靶场录像（真实沙箱构建 + 触发，独家）
漏洞原理深度分析
触发条件与影响面
完整可执行 POC 代码
利用链与缓解建议
POC 打包下载
每月 100+ 条 AI 生成额度
三、漏洞 CVE-2026-15780 的情报信息
请登录查看更多情报信息。
CVE-2026-15780 补丁与修复 (9)
CVE-2026-15780 安全博客文章 (1)
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2026-15780
暂无评论