目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CVE-2026-16515— Zephyr IPv6协议栈ICMPv6网络放大漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
zephyrproject zephyr
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

以下是该漏洞描述的中文翻译: 中的 仅实现了 RFC 4443 第 2.4 节中三条抑制规则中的一条(即“不得以 ICMPv6 错误响应 ICMPv6 错误”)。它未检查触发报文的源地址是否标识单个节点(规则 e.6),也未检查该报文是否发送至多播目标地址(规则 e.3,其例外情况仅为“报文过大”和“参数问题代码 2”)。在五个调用点中,只有 中端口不可达路径自带了等效的保护机制;而 和 中的扩展头、未知下一跳头以及分片路径则没有任何保护。 拥有同一链路访问权限的未认证攻击者可以通过两种方式利用此漏洞: 1. 发送

CVSS 4.7 · Medium EPSS 0.20% · P10

影响版本矩阵 1

厂商产品 版本范围状态
zephyrproject zephyr 1.14.0< 4.4.2 affected
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-16515 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
ICMPv6 error messages sent for multicast-destined packets and non-unique source addresses enable network amplification in Zephyr's IPv6 stack
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
net_icmpv6_send_error() in subsys/net/ip/icmpv6.c implemented only one of the three RFC 4443 section 2.4 suppression rules (do not answer an ICMPv6 error with an ICMPv6 error). It did not check whether the triggering packet's source address identifies a single node (rule e.6) or whether the packet was sent to a multicast destination (rule e.3, whose only exceptions are Packet Too Big and Parameter Problem Code 2). Of the five call sites, only the port-unreachable path in subsys/net/ip/connection.c carried an equivalent guard of its own; the extension-header, unknown-next-header and fragmentation paths in subsys/net/ip/ipv6.c and subsys/net/ip/ipv6_fragment.c had none. An unauthenticated attacker with access to the same link can exploit this in two ways. Sending a single IPv6 packet to the link-local all-nodes group ff02::1 carrying an unrecognized next-header value, with the source address spoofed to a chosen victim, causes every Zephyr node on the link to emit an ICMPv6 Parameter Problem message to that victim — a reflector with an amplification factor equal to the number of nodes. Alternatively, sending a unicast packet whose source address is a multicast address causes the node to transmit its ICMPv6 error to that multicast address, turning one unicast packet into a link-flooded multicast frame. Packets addressed to ff02::1 are accepted unconditionally by ipv6_input(), and no check rejects a multicast source address, so no special configuration is required. The impact is degraded availability of the shared link and of the reflection victim, together with the ability for the attacker to hide its own address behind the responding nodes. The effect is amplified on constrained mesh links such as 802.15.4/Thread, where link-local multicast is flooded hop by hop. There is no memory-safety consequence: the error packet itself is well formed, it is simply emitted in cases where the protocol forbids it. The fix adds both suppression checks at the single choke point in net_icmpv6_send_error(), before any reply packet is allocated, preserving the RFC-mandated exceptions for NET_ICMPV6_PACKET_TOO_BIG and Parameter Problem Code 2. Note that the IPv4 counterpart net_icmpv4_send_error() in subsys/net/ip/icmpv4.c still checks only for a broadcast destination and retains an equivalent gap for multicast destinations and non-unique sources.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
对网络消息容量的控制不充分(网络放大攻击)
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
zephyrproject zephyr 1.14.0 ~ 4.4.2 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-16515 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-16515 的情报信息

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-16515 补丁与修复 (1)

CVE-2026-16515 其他参考 (1)

同批安全公告 · zephyrproject · 2026-09-18 · 共 3 条

CVE-2026-16514 4.3 MEDIUM OpenLiteOS gPTP Announce路径跟踪越界读取漏洞
CVE-2026-16512 3.1 LOW Zephyr gPTP接收路径短帧越界读取漏洞

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-16515

暂无评论


发表评论