Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-23465— btrfs: log new dentries when logging parent dir of a conflicting inode

Quick assessment

Affected
Linux Linux
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于未记录新目录项,可能导致数据丢失。

AI Predicted 5.5 Difficulty: Theoretical EPSS 0.12% · P2

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1 AI

T1562.001

Affected Version Matrix 12

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
Linux Linux a3baaf0d786e22fc86295fda9c58ba0dee07599f< 56e72c8b02d982be775d9df025357c152383ee84 affected
a3baaf0d786e22fc86295fda9c58ba0dee07599f< f556b1e09d054e31f464c0fd37280c2b5a393fee affected
a3baaf0d786e22fc86295fda9c58ba0dee07599f< 1cf30c73602c69d750c9345c47f2c0e9d0cfb578 affected
a3baaf0d786e22fc86295fda9c58ba0dee07599f< 6f5a51969b1deb79aefd2194b48fe7e78e72ff7e affected
a3baaf0d786e22fc86295fda9c58ba0dee07599f< 9573a365ff9ff45da9222d3fe63695ce562beb24 affected
5.1 affected
< 5.1 unaffected
6.6.130≤ 6.6.* unaffected
… +4 more rows
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-23465

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
btrfs: log new dentries when logging parent dir of a conflicting inode
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: log new dentries when logging parent dir of a conflicting inode If we log the parent directory of a conflicting inode, we are not logging the new dentries of the directory, so when we finish we have the parent directory's inode marked as logged but we did not log its new dentries. As a consequence if the parent directory is explicitly fsynced later and it does not have any new changes since we logged it, the fsync is a no-op and after a power failure the new dentries are missing. Example scenario: $ mkdir foo $ sync $rmdir foo $ mkdir dir1 $ mkdir dir2 # A file with the same name and parent as the directory we just deleted # and was persisted in a past transaction. So the deleted directory's # inode is a conflicting inode of this new file's inode. $ touch foo $ ln foo dir2/link # The fsync on dir2 will log the parent directory (".") because the # conflicting inode (deleted directory) does not exists anymore, but it # it does not log its new dentries (dir1). $ xfs_io -c "fsync" dir2 # This fsync on the parent directory is no-op, since the previous fsync # logged it (but without logging its new dentries). $ xfs_io -c "fsync" . <power failure> # After log replay dir1 is missing. Fix this by ensuring we log new dir dentries whenever we log the parent directory of a no longer existing conflicting inode. A test case for fstests will follow soon.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于未记录新目录项,可能导致数据丢失。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
Linux Linux a3baaf0d786e22fc86295fda9c58ba0dee07599f ~ 56e72c8b02d982be775d9df025357c152383ee84 -
Linux Linux 5.1 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-23465

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-23465

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Same Patch Batch · Linux · 2026-04-03 · 71 CVEs total

CVE-2026-31402 9.8 CRITICAL nfsd: fix heap overflow in NFSv4.0 LOCK replay cache
CVE-2026-23450 9.8 CRITICAL net/smc: fix NULL dereference and UAF in smc_tcp_syn_recv_sock()
CVE-2026-23427 9.8 CRITICAL ksmbd: fix use-after-free in durable v2 replay of active file handles
CVE-2026-23428 9.8 CRITICAL ksmbd: fix use-after-free of share_conf in compound request
CVE-2026-23455 9.1 CRITICAL netfilter: nf_conntrack_h323: check for zero length in DecodeQ931()
CVE-2026-23461 8.8 HIGH Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_unregister_user
CVE-2026-23425 8.8 HIGH KVM: arm64: Fix ID register initialization for non-protected pKVM guests
CVE-2026-23462 8.8 HIGH Bluetooth: HIDP: Fix possible UAF
CVE-2026-23457 8.6 HIGH netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: fix Content-Length u32 truncation in sip_help_tcp()
CVE-2026-23459 8.2 HIGH ip_tunnel: adapt iptunnel_xmit_stats() to NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_DSTATS
CVE-2026-23456 8.2 HIGH netfilter: nf_conntrack_h323: fix OOB read in decode_int() CONS case
CVE-2026-31393 8.1 HIGH Bluetooth: L2CAP: Validate L2CAP_INFO_RSP payload length before access
CVE-2026-31392 8.1 HIGH smb: client: fix krb5 mount with username option
CVE-2026-31398 7.8 HIGH mm/rmap: fix incorrect pte restoration for lazyfree folios
CVE-2026-23432 7.8 HIGH mshv: Fix use-after-free in mshv_map_user_memory error path
CVE-2026-23437 7.8 HIGH net: shaper: protect late read accesses to the hierarchy
CVE-2026-23458 7.8 HIGH netfilter: ctnetlink: fix use-after-free in ctnetlink_dump_exp_ct()
CVE-2026-23444 7.8 HIGH wifi: mac80211: always free skb on ieee80211_tx_prepare_skb() failure
CVE-2026-23445 7.8 HIGH igc: fix page fault in XDP TX timestamps handling
CVE-2026-23449 7.8 HIGH net/sched: teql: Fix double-free in teql_master_xmit

Showing top 20 of 71 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-23465

No comments yet


Leave a comment