支持本站 — 捐款将帮助我们持续运营

目标: 1000 元,已筹: 1000

100.0%
获取后续新漏洞提醒登录后订阅
一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-2673 基础信息
漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Description
Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Type
在会话协商时选择低安全性的算法(算法降级)
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Title
OpenSSL 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
OpenSSL是OpenSSL团队的一个开源的能够实现安全套接层(SSLv2/v3)和安全传输层(TLSv1)协议的通用加密库。该产品支持多种加密算法,包括对称密码、哈希算法、安全散列算法等。 OpenSSL 3.6版本和3.5版本存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于配置使用DEFAULT关键字时存在缺陷,可能导致客户端和服务器无法协商相互支持的密钥交换组。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
受影响产品
厂商产品影响版本CPE订阅
OpenSSLOpenSSL 3.6.0 ~ 3.6.2 -
二、漏洞 CVE-2026-2673 的公开POC
#POC 描述源链接神龙链接
AI 生成 POC高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC
三、漏洞 CVE-2026-2673 的情报信息
Please 登录 to view more intelligence information
四、漏洞 CVE-2026-2673 的评论

暂无评论


发表评论