目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1000

100.0%
CVSS 9.9 · Critical
获取后续新漏洞提醒登录后订阅
一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-42811 基础信息
漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
Apache Polaris: could broaden vended GCS credentials through unescaped identifier content in access-boundary CEL conditions
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Description
In plain terms, Apache Polaris is supposed to issue short-lived GCS credentials that only work for one table's files, but a crafted namespace or table name can cause those credentials to work across the configured bucket instead. Apache Polaris builds Google Cloud Storage downscoped credentials by creating a Credential Access Boundary (CAB) with CEL conditions that are intended to restrict access to the requested table's storage path. The relevant CEL string is built from the bucket name and the table path. That table path is derived from namespace and table identifiers. In current code, that path appears to be inserted into the CEL expression without escaping. As a result, a namespace or table identifier containing a single quote and other URI-safe CEL fragments can break out of the intended quoted string and change the meaning of the CEL condition. In private testing against Polaris 1.4.0 on real Google Cloud Storage, it was confirmed that Polaris accepted a crafted identifier and returned delegated GCS credentials whose CEL path restriction had effectively collapsed. Those delegated credentials could then: - list another table's object prefix; - read another table's metadata control file (Iceberg metadata JSON); - create and delete an object under another table's object prefix; - and also list, read, create, and delete objects under an unrelated external prefix in the same bucket that was not part of any table path. That last point is important. The issue is not limited to "another table". In the confirmed setup, once Apache Polaris returned credentials for the crafted table, the path restriction inside the configured bucket was effectively gone. The practical effect is that temporary credentials for one crafted table can be broader than the table Polaris was asked to authorize, and can become effectively bucket-wide within the configured bucket. The current GCS testing used a Polaris principal with broad catalog privileges for setup. A separate least-privilege Polaris RBAC variant has not yet been tested on GCS. However, the storage-credential broadening behavior itself has been confirmed on GCS.
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Type
表达式语言语句中使用的特殊元素转义处理不恰当(表达式语言注入)
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
受影响产品
厂商产品影响版本CPE订阅
Apache Software FoundationApache Polaris 0 ~ 1.4.1 -
二、漏洞 CVE-2026-42811 的公开POC
#POC 描述源链接神龙链接
AI 生成 POC高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC
三、漏洞 CVE-2026-42811 的情报信息
Please 登录 to view more intelligence information
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2026-42811

暂无评论


发表评论