目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1310

100%

CVE-2026-46223— Linux kernel 安全漏洞

AI 预测 5.5 利用难度: 中等 EPSS 0.02% · P5

影响版本矩阵 8

厂商产品版本范围状态
LinuxLinux1b164b876c36c3eb5561dd9b37702b04401b0166< 33fa2e6b1507a0a377a151a8826438bedad1d0b0affected
1b164b876c36c3eb5561dd9b37702b04401b0166< 93618edf753838a727dbff63c7c291dee22d656baffected
78c72bce4a87819126211c0d24e18350010604fbaffected
6.19.12< 6.20affected
7.0affected
< 7.0unaffected
7.0.9≤ 7.0.*unaffected
7.1-rc3≤ *unaffected
获取后续新漏洞提醒登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-46223 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
cgroup: Defer css percpu_ref kill on rmdir until cgroup is depopulated
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cgroup: Defer css percpu_ref kill on rmdir until cgroup is depopulated A chain of commits going back to v7.0 reworked rmdir to satisfy the controller invariant that a subsystem's ->css_offline() must not run while tasks are still doing kernel-side work in the cgroup. [1] d245698d727a ("cgroup: Defer task cgroup unlink until after the task is done switching out") [2] a72f73c4dd9b ("cgroup: Don't expose dead tasks in cgroup") [3] 1b164b876c36 ("cgroup: Wait for dying tasks to leave on rmdir") [4] 4c56a8ac6869 ("cgroup: Fix cgroup_drain_dying() testing the wrong condition") [5] 13e786b64bd3 ("cgroup: Increment nr_dying_subsys_* from rmdir context") [1] moved task cset unlink from do_exit() to finish_task_switch() so a task's cset link drops only after the task has fully stopped scheduling. That made tasks past exit_signals() linger on cset->tasks until their final context switch, which led to a series of problems as what userspace expected to see after rmdir diverged from what the kernel needs to wait for. [2]-[5] tried to bridge that divergence: [2] filtered the exiting tasks from cgroup.procs; [3] had rmdir(2) sleep in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE for them; [4] fixed the wait's condition; [5] made nr_dying_subsys_* visible synchronously. The cgroup_drain_dying() wait in [3] turned out to be a dead end. When the rmdir caller is also the reaper of a zombie that pins a pidns teardown (e.g. host PID 1 systemd reaping orphan pids that were re-parented to it during the same teardown), rmdir blocks in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE waiting for those pids to free, the pids can't free because PID 1 is the reaper and it's stuck in rmdir, and the system A-A deadlocks. No internal lock ordering breaks this; the wait itself is the bug. The css killing side that drove the original reorder, however, can be made cleanly asynchronous: ->css_offline() is already async, run from css_killed_work_fn() driven by percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(). The fix is to make that chain start only after all tasks have left the cgroup. rmdir's user-visible side then returns as soon as cgroup.procs and friends are empty, while ->css_offline() still runs only after the cgroup is fully drained. Verified by the original reproducer (pidns teardown + zombie reaper, runs under vng) which hangs vanilla and succeeds here, and by per-commit deterministic repros for [2], [3], [4], [5] with a boot parameter that widens the post-exit_signals() window so each state is reliably reachable. Some stress tests on top of that. cgroup_apply_control_disable() has the same shape of pre-existing race: when a controller is disabled via subtree_control, kill_css() ran synchronously while tasks past exit_signals() could still be linked to the cgroup's csets, and ->css_offline() could fire before they drained. This patch preserves the existing synchronous behavior at that call site (kill_css_sync() + kill_css_finish() back-to-back) and a follow-up patch will defer kill_css_finish() there using a per-css trigger. This seems like the right approach and I don't see problems with it. The changes are somewhat invasive but not excessively so, so backporting to -stable should be okay. If something does turn out to be wrong, the fallback is to revert the entire chain ([1]-[5]) and rework in the development branch instead. v2: Pin cgrp across the deferred destroy work with explicit cgroup_get()/cgroup_put() around queue_work() and the work_fn. v1 wasn't actually broken (ordered cgroup_offline_wq + queue_work order in cgroup_task_dead() saved it) but the explicit ref removes the dependency on those non-obvious invariants. Also note the pre-existing cgroup_apply_control_disable() race in the description; a follow-up will defer kill_css_finish() there.
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 美国国家漏洞数据库 NVD
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会的开源操作系统Linux所使用的内核。 Linux kernel存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于cgroup中rmdir时css percpu_ref杀死延迟不足,可能导致竞争条件。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD

受影响产品

厂商产品影响版本CPE订阅
LinuxLinux 1b164b876c36c3eb5561dd9b37702b04401b0166 ~ 33fa2e6b1507a0a377a151a8826438bedad1d0b0 -
LinuxLinux 7.0 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-46223 的公开POC

#POC 描述源链接神龙链接
AI 生成 POC高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-46223 的情报信息

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-46223 补丁与修复 (2)

同批安全公告 · Linux · 2026-05-28 · 共 138 条

CVE-2026-461359.8 CRITICALLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461379.8 CRITICALLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461959.8 CRITICALLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461159.8 CRITICALLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461859.1 CRITICALLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461199.1 CRITICALLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461559.1 CRITICALLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461528.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461988.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461258.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-462388.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461748.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461138.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461668.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-462128.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-462328.1 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-461388.1 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-462097.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-462087.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-462277.8 HIGHLinux kernel 安全漏洞

显示前 20 条,共 138 条。 查看全部 &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-46223

暂无评论


发表评论