Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-46582— A wildcard replay, as another piece of data, triggers poisoning in the serve expired reply path

Quick assessment

Affected
NLnet Labs Unbound
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

NLnet Labs Unbound是荷兰NLnet Labs组织的域名系统解析服务器。 NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0版本至1.25.1版本存在处理逻辑错误漏洞,该漏洞源于对泛域名RRset的重放处理不当,可能导致攻击者通过DNSSEC签名的域名和CNAME包装记录,利用serve expired路径将注入的泛域名RRset缓存为安全状态,从而更改特定记录。

CVSS 3.7 · Low EPSS 0.25% · P15

Affected Version Matrix 1

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0< 1.25.2 affected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-46582

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
A wildcard replay, as another piece of data, triggers poisoning in the serve expired reply path
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0 up to and including 1.25.1, a replay of a wildcard rrset as another piece of data, could be briefly considered DNSSEC secure based only on the RRSIG validation and stored into cache, before later validation treats it as bogus based on NSEC validation. When the resolving thread puts secure on the rrset, and another thread that is on the serve expired path then picks up the updated rrset contents with the secure status for a reply, it can be used to change a specific record, next to a wildcard that could be covered by the wildcard, into the wildcard. A malicious actor can exploit the possible poisonous effect by having any DNSSEC-singed domain (irrelevant to the victim domain) and a CNAME wrapper record that points to a record next to a wildcard (that could be covered by the wildcard). Then quering Unbound for the wildcard sibling record would seed the secure message. A later (after expiry) query for the CNAME wrapper would need to resolve the target sibling record. If the wildcard replay is injected into the response, the wildcard rrset will update the expired sibling record with a secure status before completing proper wildcard validation with NSEC records and eventually treating the CNAME wrapper answer as bogus. The updated poisoned rrset is now secure and points to the wildcard. This vulnerability is explicit for the serve expired path and needs injection of the signed wildcard rrset without the NSEC accompanying rrset.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
不恰当实现的标准安全检查
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
NLnet Labs Unbound 处理逻辑错误漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
NLnet Labs Unbound是荷兰NLnet Labs组织的域名系统解析服务器。 NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0版本至1.25.1版本存在处理逻辑错误漏洞,该漏洞源于对泛域名RRset的重放处理不当,可能导致攻击者通过DNSSEC签名的域名和CNAME包装记录,利用serve expired路径将注入的泛域名RRset缓存为安全状态,从而更改特定记录。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
NLnet Labs Unbound 1.6.0 ~ 1.25.2 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-46582

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-46582

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-46582 (1)

Same Patch Batch · NLnet Labs · 2026-07-22 · 24 CVEs total

CVE-2026-55973 7.5 HIGH 'dns-error-reporting: yes' leads to stack buffer overflow
CVE-2026-44690 7.5 HIGH Cross-zone wildcard cache poisoning via RRSIG.labels manipulation
CVE-2026-32665 7.5 HIGH Remote DNS-over-QUIC denial of service due to `quic-size` budget bypass
CVE-2026-40691 7.5 HIGH Packet of death for DNSCrypt over TCP
CVE-2026-50248 6.5 MEDIUM BOGUS configured primary hostname accepted for XFR in auth/rpz zones
CVE-2026-50046 5.9 MEDIUM Possible heap use-after-free in an error path when a DoT forwarded query is jostled out
CVE-2026-55717 5.9 MEDIUM 'serve-expired-client-timeout' and 'response-ip' CNAME redirect could lead to a crash
CVE-2026-55991 5.9 MEDIUM Remote DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) flow-control assertion failure in libngtcp2
CVE-2026-44621 5.9 MEDIUM Libunbound applications configured with 'unwanted-reply-threshold' could eventually be abr
CVE-2026-52863 5.9 MEDIUM Memory corruption could lead to crash and denial of service
CVE-2026-55990 5.9 MEDIUM Packet of death for a DNSCrypt misconfigured Unbound
CVE-2026-14586 5.9 MEDIUM Assertion in libngtcp2 when under pressure in high concurrency DNS-over-QUIC environments
CVE-2026-56444 5.9 MEDIUM Degradation of resolution service when 'discard-timeout' and 'serve-expired-client-timeout
CVE-2026-50251 5.3 MEDIUM Attacker supplied '0.0.0.0'/'::' glue triggers defensive full-cache flush
CVE-2026-50045 5.3 MEDIUM 'max-global-quota' reset by DNSSEC validation restarts
CVE-2026-56416 4.8 MEDIUM Possible heap buffer overflow when validator canonicalizes RDATA that contains domain name
CVE-2026-44687 3.7 LOW Off-by-one error in 'harden-below-nxdomain' logic can shadow a stub/forward zone by a legi
CVE-2026-42955 3.7 LOW Extra fix for CVE-2026-40622 to also clamp the TTL of A/AAAA records disallowing a one-tim
CVE-2026-54478 3.7 LOW DNS Cookie bypass when combined with proxy-protocol use
CVE-2026-41637 3.7 LOW Degradation of resolution service from improperly accounted client-terminated DNS-over-QUI

Showing top 20 of 24 CVEs. View all on vendor page &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-46582

No comments yet


Leave a comment