MessagePack-CSharp MessagePack-CSharp是MessagePack-CSharp团队的一款消息序列化工具。 MessagePack-CSharp 2.5.301之前版本和3.1.7之前版本存在资源管理错误漏洞,该漏洞源于JSON转换组件中存在多个递归路径,未强制执行深度限制,攻击者可通过特制输入导致堆栈耗尽,触发不可捕获的堆栈溢出。
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| MessagePack-CSharp | MessagePack-CSharp | >= 3.0, < 3.1.7 |
affected |
< 2.5.301 |
affected |
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MessagePack-CSharp | MessagePack-CSharp | >= 3.0, < 3.1.7 | - |
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-48109 | 8.2 HIGH | MessagePack-CSharp: LZ4 decompression may fail with AccessViolationException after derefer |
| CVE-2026-48506 | 7.5 HIGH | MessagePack-CSharp: MessagePackReader.Skip can recurse without enforcing maximum object gr |
| CVE-2026-48516 | MessagePack-CSharp: InterfaceLookupFormatter bypasses collision-resistant comparer setting | |
| CVE-2026-48511 | MessagePack-CSharp: ExpandoObject formatter can perform quadratic insertion work on untrus | |
| CVE-2026-48513 | MessagePack-CSharp: DynamicUnionResolver generated deserializers miss depth enforcement | |
| CVE-2026-48502 | MessagePack-CSharp: Denial of service vulnerabilities can swamp the CPU or crash the proce | |
| CVE-2026-48509 | MessagePack-CSharp: ASP.NET Core MessagePackInputFormatter defaults to TrustedData for HTT | |
| CVE-2026-48510 | MessagePack-CSharp: LZ4 decompression allocates from unbounded declared output lengths | |
| CVE-2026-48517 | MessagePack-CSharp: Typeless deserialization type restrictions do not recurse into arrays | |
| CVE-2026-48515 | MessagePack-CSharp: Multi-dimensional array formatters allocate from unchecked dimensions | |
| CVE-2026-48514 | MessagePack-CSharp: Unity unsafe blit formatter allocates from unbounded byte length |
No comments yet