MessagePack-CSharp MessagePack-CSharp是MessagePack-CSharp团队的一款消息序列化工具。 MessagePack-CSharp 2.5.301之前版本和3.1.7之前版本存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于无类型反序列化操作中未递归检查数组元素类型或泛型类型参数,导致被屏蔽的危险类型可以通过数组或构造的泛型类型绕过安全检查。
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| MessagePack-CSharp | MessagePack-CSharp | >= 3.0, < 3.1.7 |
affected |
< 2.5.301 |
affected |
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MessagePack-CSharp | MessagePack-CSharp | >= 3.0, < 3.1.7 | - |
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-48109 | 8.2 HIGH | MessagePack-CSharp: LZ4 decompression may fail with AccessViolationException after derefer |
| CVE-2026-48506 | 7.5 HIGH | MessagePack-CSharp: MessagePackReader.Skip can recurse without enforcing maximum object gr |
| CVE-2026-48516 | MessagePack-CSharp: InterfaceLookupFormatter bypasses collision-resistant comparer setting | |
| CVE-2026-48511 | MessagePack-CSharp: ExpandoObject formatter can perform quadratic insertion work on untrus | |
| CVE-2026-48513 | MessagePack-CSharp: DynamicUnionResolver generated deserializers miss depth enforcement | |
| CVE-2026-48512 | MessagePack-CSharp: JSON conversion APIs can recurse without consistent depth enforcement | |
| CVE-2026-48502 | MessagePack-CSharp: Denial of service vulnerabilities can swamp the CPU or crash the proce | |
| CVE-2026-48509 | MessagePack-CSharp: ASP.NET Core MessagePackInputFormatter defaults to TrustedData for HTT | |
| CVE-2026-48510 | MessagePack-CSharp: LZ4 decompression allocates from unbounded declared output lengths | |
| CVE-2026-48515 | MessagePack-CSharp: Multi-dimensional array formatters allocate from unchecked dimensions | |
| CVE-2026-48514 | MessagePack-CSharp: Unity unsafe blit formatter allocates from unbounded byte length |
No comments yet