目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CVE-2026-64283— Linux kernel 安全漏洞

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Linux Linux
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会开源的一款操作系统内核。 Linux kernel 6.8版本存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于将memslot绑定偏移和大小视为有符号值,导致溢出检查出现假阴性。

AI 预测 5.5 利用难度: 困难 EPSS 0.14% · P3

可能的 ATT&CK 技术 1 AI

T1211 · Exploitation for Stealth

影响版本矩阵 6

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Linux Linux a7800aa80ea4d5356b8474c2302812e9d4926fa6< f3a98d5881b9bd4807f49156143565f6aabcef1e affected
a7800aa80ea4d5356b8474c2302812e9d4926fa6< eba85fee7fc6cf28fec38a5bf3c378bef9a79ca6 affected
6.8 affected
< 6.8 unaffected
7.1.4≤ 7.1.* unaffected
7.2≤ * unaffected
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-64283 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
KVM: guest_memfd: Treat memslot binding offset+size as unsigned values
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: guest_memfd: Treat memslot binding offset+size as unsigned values When binding a memslot to a guest_memfd file, treat the offset and size as unsigned values to fix a bug where the sum of the two can result in a false negative when checking for overflow against the size of the file. Passing unsigned values also avoids relying on somewhat obscure checks in other flows for safety, and tracks the offset and size as they are intended to be tracked, as unsigned values. On 64-bit kernels, the number of pages a memslot contains and thus the size (and offset) of its guest_memfd binding are unsigned 64-bit values. Taking the offset+size as an loff_t instead of a uoff_t inadvertently converts the unsigned value to a signed value if the offset and/or size is massive. Locally storing the offset and size as signed values is benign in and of itself (though even that is *extremely* difficult to discern), but operating on their sum is not. For the offset, KVM explicitly checks against a negative value, which might seem like a bug as KVM could incorrectly reject a legitimate binding, but that's not actually the case as KVM_CREATE_GUEST_MEMFD takes a signed value for its size, i.e. a would-be-negative offset is also greater than the maximum possible size of any guest_memfd file. Regarding the size, while KVM lacks an explicit check for a negative value, i.e. seemingly has a flawed overflow check, KVM restricts the number of pages in a single memslot to the largest positive signed 32-bit value: if (id < KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS && (mem->memory_size >> PAGE_SHIFT) > KVM_MEM_MAX_NR_PAGES) return -EINVAL; and so that maximum "size" will ever be is 0x7fffffff000. The sum of the two is, however, problematic. While the size is restricted by KVM's memslot logic, the offset is not, i.e. the offset is completely unchecked until the "offset + size > i_size_read(inode)" check. If the offset is the (nearly) largest possible _positive_ value, then adding size to the offset can result in a signed, negative 64-bit value. When compared against the size of the file (guaranteed to be positive), the negative sum is always smaller, and KVM incorrectly allows the absurd offset. Opportunistically add missing includes in kvm_mm.h (instead of relying on its parents).
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
Linux kernel 安全漏洞
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Description
Linux kernel是美国Linux基金会开源的一款操作系统内核。 Linux kernel 6.8版本存在安全漏洞,该漏洞源于将memslot绑定偏移和大小视为有符号值,导致溢出检查出现假阴性。
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: 中国国家信息安全漏洞库 CNNVD

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Linux Linux a7800aa80ea4d5356b8474c2302812e9d4926fa6 ~ f3a98d5881b9bd4807f49156143565f6aabcef1e -
Linux Linux 6.8 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-64283 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-64283 的情报信息

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-64283 补丁与修复 (2)

同批安全公告 · Linux · 2026-07-25 · 共 274 条

CVE-2026-64355 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64459 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64303 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64439 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64410 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64399 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64397 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64391 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64387 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64386 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64385 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64383 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64384 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64268 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64523 9.8 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64257 9.1 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64392 9.1 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64393 9.1 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64269 9.1 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞
CVE-2026-64319 9.1 CRITICAL Linux kernel 安全漏洞

显示前 20 条,共 274 条。 查看全部 &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-64283

暂无评论


发表评论