Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-66402— FreeRDP before 3.29.0 TLS Certificate Identity Validation Bypass

Quick assessment

Affected
FreeRDP FreeRDP
Exploitation
Public or AI PoC available; prioritize validation
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

FreeRDP是FreeRDP团队开源的一款远程桌面协议(RDP)的实现。 FreeRDP 3.29.0之前版本存在加密问题漏洞,该漏洞源于tls_verify_certificate()、tls_match_hostname()和x509_utils_get_dns_names()函数中的TLS证书身份验证弱点,使用自定义Common Name和DNS SAN字符串匹配而非OpenSSL长度感知的身份验证API,导致NUL字节截断、接受不匹配的DNS SAN条目时匹配Common Name以及不比较IP

CVSS 9.8 · Critical EPSS 0.51% · P42

Possible ATT&CK Techniques 1 AI

T1557 · Adversary-in-the-Middle

Affected Version Matrix 2

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
FreeRDP FreeRDP < 3.29.0 affected
3.29.0 unaffected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-66402

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 TLS Certificate Identity Validation Bypass
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions <= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL's length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. 'victim.example\0.attacker.example' as 'victim.example'), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
证书验证不恰当
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
FreeRDP 加密问题漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
FreeRDP是FreeRDP团队开源的一款远程桌面协议(RDP)的实现。 FreeRDP 3.29.0之前版本存在加密问题漏洞,该漏洞源于tls_verify_certificate()、tls_match_hostname()和x509_utils_get_dns_names()函数中的TLS证书身份验证弱点,使用自定义Common Name和DNS SAN字符串匹配而非OpenSSL长度感知的身份验证API,导致NUL字节截断、接受不匹配的DNS SAN条目时匹配Common Name以及不比较IP
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
FreeRDP FreeRDP 0 ~ 3.29.0 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-66402

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B · 12475 chars
Pro+ exclusive includes:
Vulnerability reproduction recording (real sandbox build + trigger, exclusive)
In-depth vulnerability mechanism
Trigger conditions & impact
Full executable POC code
Exploit chain & mitigation
POC zip download
100+ AI POC generations per month

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-66402

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2026-66402 (1)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-66402 (2)

Same Patch Batch · FreeRDP · 2026-08-01 · 21 CVEs total

CVE-2026-67289 9.8 CRITICAL FreeRDP before 3.29.0 HTTP Proxy Request Injection via Redirection
CVE-2026-67305 9.4 CRITICAL FreeRDP Windows Client before 3.29.0 Heap Buffer Overflow via Cliprdr
CVE-2026-67299 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Use-After-Free via WindowIcon async message
CVE-2026-67304 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 NULL Dereference via smartcard cleanup
CVE-2026-67297 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Resource Exhaustion via chunked HTTP response
CVE-2026-67301 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Out-of-bounds Read via Polygon async message-proxy
CVE-2026-67290 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Heap Out-of-Bounds Read via TSMF
CVE-2026-67296 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Denial of Service via RDPEI PDU
CVE-2026-67291 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Heap Out-of-Bounds Read via GLYPH_FRAGMENT_ADD
CVE-2026-67300 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Use-After-Free via async message proxy
CVE-2026-67288 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Denial of Service via smartcard cache
CVE-2026-67298 7.5 HIGH FreeRDP 3.28.0 Heap Buffer Overflow via RAIL orderLength Underflow
CVE-2026-67292 6.5 MEDIUM FreeRDP before 3.29.0 WebSocket Ping Buffer Over-disclosure
CVE-2026-67295 6.3 MEDIUM FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Path Traversal via drive redirection
CVE-2026-67294 5.9 MEDIUM FreeRDP before 3.29.0 TLS Certificate EKU Bypass
CVE-2026-67306 5.4 MEDIUM FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Out-of-Bounds Read via Planar RLE
CVE-2026-67303 4.3 MEDIUM FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Denial of Service via serial DeviceControl
CVE-2026-67302 4.3 MEDIUM FreeRDP rdpecam StartStreamsRequest divide-by-zero denial of service
CVE-2026-67293 4.2 MEDIUM FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Improper Certificate Hostname Validation
CVE-2026-66401 2.1 LOW FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Out-of-Bounds Read via UVC H.264

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-66402

No comments yet


Leave a comment