Goal Reached Thanks to every supporter — we hit 100%!

Goal: 1000 CNY · Raised: 1359 CNY

100%

CVE-2026-7007— Division by zero in Zephyr ext2 superblock parsing allows DoS via crafted filesystem image

Quick assessment

Affected
zephyrproject zephyr
Exploitation
No confirmed in-the-wild exploitation; assess based on exposure
Recommended action
Check the vendor advisory and references for a fixed version. If immediate upgrade is impossible, restrict exposure and increase monitoring.

zephyrproject zephyr是zephyrproject组织开源的一款实时操作系统内核。 zephyrproject zephyr 3.5.0版本至4.5.0之前版本存在数字错误漏洞,该漏洞源于Zephyr ext2文件系统在校验超级块时未验证s_blocks_per_group和s_inodes_per_group字段是否为零,在挂载过程中用作除数时导致整数除零,可能造成拒绝服务。

CVSS 4.6 · Medium EPSS 0.24% · P14

Affected Version Matrix 1

VendorProduct Version RangeStatus
zephyrproject zephyr 3.5.0< 4.4.2 affected
Get alerts for future matching vulnerabilities Log in to subscribe

I. Basic Information for CVE-2026-7007

Vulnerability Information

Have questions about the vulnerability? See if Shenlong's analysis helps!
View Shenlong Deep Dive ↗

Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.

Vulnerability Title
Division by zero in Zephyr ext2 superblock parsing allows DoS via crafted filesystem image
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
The Zephyr ext2 file system validates the on-disk superblock in ext2_verify_disk_superblock() (subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_impl.c) before completing a mount. The validator checked the magic number, block size, revision and feature flags, but did not verify that the on-disk fields s_blocks_per_group and s_inodes_per_group are non-zero. Both fields are read directly from the image and are later used as divisors during mount-time initialization. During mount, get_ngroups() divides and modulos s_blocks_count by s_blocks_per_group (reached via ext2_fetch_block_group() from ext2_init_fs()), and get_itable_entry() divides (ino - 1) by s_inodes_per_group when fetching the root inode (both in subsys/fs/ext2/ext2_diskops.c). A superblock with either field set to zero therefore causes an integer division by zero during the mount sequence. An attacker who can present a crafted ext2 image to a device that mounts ext2 — removable media such as an SD card or a USB mass-storage device — can trigger this. On ARMv7-M / ARMv8-M-mainline Cortex-M targets, divide-by-zero trapping is enabled (SCB_CCR_DIV_0_TRP), so the division raises a UsageFault that Zephyr treats as a fatal error, producing a denial of service. The impact is limited to availability; the malformed value is consumed only as a divisor. The fix rejects a zero s_blocks_per_group or s_inodes_per_group in the superblock validator, returning -EINVAL so the mount fails before any block-group or inode I/O occurs.
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
除零错误
Source: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Title
zephyrproject zephyr 数字错误漏洞
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Description
zephyrproject zephyr是zephyrproject组织开源的一款实时操作系统内核。 zephyrproject zephyr 3.5.0版本至4.5.0之前版本存在数字错误漏洞,该漏洞源于Zephyr ext2文件系统在校验超级块时未验证s_blocks_per_group和s_inodes_per_group字段是否为零,在挂载过程中用作除数时导致整数除零,可能造成拒绝服务。
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
CVSS Information
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)
Vulnerability Type
N/A
Source: CNNVD (China National Vulnerability Database)

Affected Products

Vendor Product Affected Versions CPE Subscribe
zephyrproject zephyr 3.5.0 ~ 4.4.2 -

II. Public POCs for CVE-2026-7007

# POC Description Source Link Shenlong Link
AI-Generated POC Premium

No public POC found.

Login to generate AI POC

III. Intelligence Information for CVE-2026-7007

请登录查看更多情报信息。

Patches & Fixes for CVE-2026-7007 (1)

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-7007 (1)

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-7007

No comments yet


Leave a comment