目标达成 感谢每一位支持者 — 我们达成了 100% 目标!

目标: 1000 元 · 已筹: 1336

100%

CVE-2026-74700— Linux cls_api 销毁锁分类器时始终获取 rtnl_lock

一分钟漏洞结论

影响对象
Linux Linux
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据,仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本;无法立即升级时,限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。

在 Linux 内核中,已修复以下漏洞: net/sched: cls_api: 销毁受锁保护的分类器时,始终获取 rtnl_lock 另一个关于未解锁过滤器的挑战。 在 中存在一个短暂的时间窗口,在此窗口期内, 可能被一个完全无关的、未解锁的分类器请求找到并短暂引用,从而导致竞态条件。 Feng 创建了一个概念验证(PoC),通过两个线程触发此竞态:一个线程创建 u32 过滤器,另一个线程在同一链/优先级中创建 flower 过滤器: 1. 两个线程都进入 ,都发现链为空,都释放了 。 2. u32 线程率先完成

CVSS 7.8 · High EPSS 0.12% · P2

影响版本矩阵 12

厂商产品 版本范围状态
Linux Linux 12db03b65c2b90752e4c37666977fd4a1b5f5824< 34e77d8e3570f9df3952496ddb402833695662fd affected
12db03b65c2b90752e4c37666977fd4a1b5f5824< b648c8a56531aeabd1c14f6b5cf1891e269b3756 affected
12db03b65c2b90752e4c37666977fd4a1b5f5824< d6222af7274f08e7a1848131dc30319993d8f377 affected
12db03b65c2b90752e4c37666977fd4a1b5f5824< a81f9c44d87fb59d99fce72e29e02cab3a49a1c3 affected
12db03b65c2b90752e4c37666977fd4a1b5f5824< a347304b2ca1a5377d5bd2d8a72e4b4f12afe648 affected
5.1 affected
< 5.1 unaffected
6.6.152≤ 6.6.* unaffected
… +4 条更多
获取后续新漏洞提醒 登录后订阅

一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-74700 基础信息

漏洞信息

对漏洞内容有疑问?看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助!
查看神龙十问 ↗

尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术,但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性,但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。

Vulnerability Title
net/sched: cls_api: Always acquire rtnl_lock when destroying locked classifiers
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: cls_api: Always acquire rtnl_lock when destroying locked classifiers Another challenge with unlocked filters. There is a short window in tc_new_tfilter where a tcf_proto can be found and briefly referenced by a totally unrelated, unlocked classifier's request and cause a race. Feng created a poc which created this race with two threads, one creating a u32 filter and other a flower filter in the same chain/prio: 1. Both threads enter tc_new_tfilter, both find the chain empty, both drop filter_chain_lock 2. u32 finishes tcf_proto_create("u32") first, calls tcf_chain_tp_insert_unique() -> inserts u32_tp into the chain 3. flower finishes tcf_proto_create("flower") later, calls tcf_chain_tp_insert_unique() -> tcf_chain_tp_find() now sees u32_tp already there, takes a reference on it, destroys flower's own tp_new and returns u32_tp to the caller. Flower then hits the kind mismatch check (because it requested for kind "flower" but tp->ops->kind is "u32") and goes through the errout path which calls tcf_proto_put() on u32_tp. If the u32 thread has already gone through its own errout (its change() call failed on the PoC's empty options) and dropped its create and insert refs, flower's put is the last one and drops u32_tp's refcnt to zero. At this point tp->ops->destroy() runs in a context that never took rtnl_lock. When that happens, it might cause a UAF like the following (illustrated by the PoC): [ +0.000710] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in u32_init (net/sched/cls_u32.c:393) [ +0.000281] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888120022f00 by task poc_feng_xue/524 Call Trace: u32_init (net/sched/cls_u32.c:393) tc_new_tfilter (net/sched/cls_api.c:2378) Allocated by task 526: u32_init (net/sched/cls_u32.c:378) tc_new_tfilter (net/sched/cls_api.c:2378) Freed by task 522: kfree u32_destroy (net/sched/cls_u32.c:662) tcf_proto_destroy (net/sched/cls_api.c:446) tcf_proto_put (net/sched/cls_api.c:459) tc_new_tfilter (net/sched/cls_api.c:2459) Fix this by having tcf_proto_destroy() take rtnl_lock around tp->ops->destroy() for locked classifiers whenever rtnl is not held. To explain why I used a temp variable "not_lockless" I'd like to point to a semi-related note on rtnl_held vs TCF_PROTO_OPS_DOIT_UNLOCKED (adding here for future cleanup if deemed necessary): The rtnl_held parameter and the TCF_PROTO_OPS_DOIT_UNLOCKED flag are redundant sources of truth for whether rtnl_lock is held. Among the nine classifier destroy(..rtnl_held..) callbacks, only flower consults the rtnl_held parameter which it propagates to tc_setup_cb_destroy() and tc_setup_cb_call(). The other eight (u32, flow, bpf, cgroup, route, basic, fw, mall) ignore it entirely;-> those that call tc_setup_cb_destroy() (u32, bpf, mall) hardcode true always instead of forwarding the parameter. A future cleanup should remove the rtnl_held parameter from the destroy callback signature entirely and have callers rely solely on their knowledge whether they are running in an unlocked context.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5

受影响产品

厂商 产品 影响版本 CPE 订阅
Linux Linux 12db03b65c2b90752e4c37666977fd4a1b5f5824 ~ 34e77d8e3570f9df3952496ddb402833695662fd -
Linux Linux 5.1 -

二、漏洞 CVE-2026-74700 的公开POC

# POC 描述 源链接 神龙链接
AI 生成 POC 高级

未找到公开 POC。

登录以生成 AI POC

三、漏洞 CVE-2026-74700 的情报信息

登录查看更多情报信息。

CVE-2026-74700 补丁与修复 (4)

同批安全公告 · Linux · 2026-08-22 · 共 150 条

CVE-2026-74705 10.0 CRITICAL UDP隧道分段潜在使用-after-free漏洞
CVE-2026-74612 10.0 CRITICAL Linux内核veth模块SKB长度计算漏洞
CVE-2026-74611 9.8 CRITICAL TLS 1.3 乐观重试消息迭代器恢复漏洞
CVE-2026-74628 9.8 CRITICAL Linux内核 x25 远程计时器释放后使用漏洞
CVE-2026-74617 9.8 CRITICAL dibs: 在dibs_dev_alloc()中初始化dibs->lock
CVE-2026-74597 9.8 CRITICAL Linux ip6_tunnel skb2->cb[]未清除漏洞
CVE-2026-74616 9.8 CRITICAL Linux内核XDP克隆数据包越界漏洞
CVE-2026-74688 9.8 CRITICAL SCTP传输控制块移除漏洞
CVE-2026-74591 9.8 CRITICAL Linux 内核文件映射恢复索引前重试导致漏洞
CVE-2026-74587 9.8 CRITICAL SCTP 缓存 ASCONF 块使用后释放漏洞
CVE-2026-74608 9.8 CRITICAL SMB客户端cifs_try_adding_channels函数中的释放后使用漏洞
CVE-2026-74723 9.8 CRITICAL btrfs LZO拒绝无有效头部的内联扩展
CVE-2026-74730 9.8 CRITICAL NFS:在FREE_STATEID调用期间锁定struct nfs_server
CVE-2026-74727 9.8 CRITICAL OpenVPN by_id移除后跳过哈希重构
CVE-2026-74586 9.8 CRITICAL Linux内核SCTP对等端移除时传输未清理漏洞
CVE-2026-74662 9.8 CRITICAL Linux inet frags 定时器竞争条件漏洞
CVE-2026-74588 9.8 CRITICAL Linux SCTP传输列表不同步漏洞
CVE-2026-74669 9.8 CRITICAL Linux IPVS IPv4选项后重定位隧道ICMP错误
CVE-2026-74712 9.3 CRITICAL mlx5 vdpa 在 create_direct_keys() 中缓冲区长度修复漏洞
CVE-2026-74665 9.1 CRITICAL NET skb长度计算通用XDP片段调整后修复

显示前 20 条,共 150 条。 查看全部 &rarr; →

IV. Related Vulnerabilities

V. Comments for CVE-2026-74700

暂无评论


发表评论