“资源分配缺乏限制或节流”漏洞(CWE-770)存在于 ash-project 的 组件中,允许未认证的攻击者绕过已配置的 GraphQL 查询复杂度限制,强制数据库执行无限制的读取操作。 漏洞详情: 中的 函数仅在参数映射中包含 (即偏移量分页)时,才将子查询的复杂度乘以请求的分页大小。然而,Relay 连接和密钥集分页(keyset pagination)使用的是 和 参数,这些参数不会匹配上述 的判断条件,因此会落入通用的默认处理逻辑,仅返回 。 因此,像 这样的嵌套 Relay 查询会被评估为“极简”复杂度
| Vendor | Product | Version Range | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash_graphql | 0.16.23< 1.11.0 |
affected |
d8a3e1b15587180ad9cb3ceeb398863d086c163b< c3229f6a65cbabb32fd7ffcac881922d1b3b30ad |
affected |
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash_graphql | 0.16.23 ~ 1.11.0 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| ash-project | ash_graphql | d8a3e1b15587180ad9cb3ceeb398863d086c163b ~ c3229f6a65cbabb32fd7ffcac881922d1b3b30ad |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash_graphql:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-78699 | 7.2 HIGH | rename_tenant returns :ok on a failed rename, enabling cross-tenant access in AshPostgres |
| CVE-2026-80223 | 7.1 HIGH | Cross-tenant subscription disclosure in AshGraphql authorizes notifications in memory with |
| CVE-2026-78693 | 6.9 MEDIUM | Incomplete redaction re-attaches the original error path in AshGraphql, leaking internal f |
| CVE-2026-81633 | 6.9 MEDIUM | Unhandled KeyError in AshGraphql relay node resolution crashes queries via an unknown type |
| CVE-2026-77454 | 5.9 MEDIUM | exists/2 predicate silently dropped on limited relationships with a parent() filter in Ash |
| CVE-2026-81319 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Unsafe deserialization of decrypted terms enables node DoS in AshCloak |
| CVE-2026-75847 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Sensitive attribute values stored in a non-sensitive public changes map in AshPaperTrail |
| CVE-2026-78228 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Unbounded handle_error recursion enables denial of service in AshOban triggers |
| CVE-2026-78038 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Job argument injection via :args overrides primary_key and tenant in AshOban |
| CVE-2026-77970 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Sensitive fields nested in embedded values are not redacted in AshPaperTrail versions |
| CVE-2026-82367 | 2.3 LOW | Re-entrant synchronous publish in AshGraphql subscription batcher delivers one subscriber' |
| CVE-2026-81643 | 2.3 LOW | Broken access control in AshGraphql subscription batcher applies authorization suppression |
| CVE-2026-80227 | 2.1 LOW | SQL string_trim removes only spaces, diverging from in-memory trimming in AshSql |
| CVE-2026-78691 | 2.1 LOW | Unescaped backslash allows LIKE wildcard injection in AshSql string search |
| CVE-2026-81316 | 2.1 LOW | Same-named aggregates with differing filters are conflated in AshSql |
| CVE-2026-81318 | 2.1 LOW | Distinct-query aggregate drops the tenant schema prefix, leaking across tenants in AshSql |
| CVE-2026-81322 | 2.1 LOW | Cloaked plaintext leaks through a non-sensitive action argument in AshCloak |
| CVE-2026-77846 | 2.1 LOW | JSON path injection via unescaped get_path segments in AshSqlite |
| CVE-2026-77831 | 2.1 LOW | Algorithmic-complexity denial of service in AshPaperTrail full-diff list tracking |
No comments yet