CVE-2026-82428— Apache Storm 跨租户依赖Jar替换漏洞
一分钟漏洞结论
影响对象
Apache Software Foundation Apache Storm Client
利用判断
尚无明确在野利用证据，仍需结合暴露面评估
建议动作
优先检查厂商安全公告和参考链接中的修复版本；无法立即升级时，限制受影响服务暴露并加强监测。
以下是该漏洞描述信息的中文翻译： 描述 通过 上传的依赖构件原本仅基于 Maven 坐标生成 Blob 键，例如 。因此，集群中所有用户生成的键都相同，且键值可预先预测。当该 Blob 已存在时，上传器捕获 并静默复用已存在的 Blob，而未检查现有 Blob 的内容或所有者是否与提交者解析出的构件相匹配。 因此，最先在此类键下上传 Blob 的用户，将控制后续所有提交相同坐标的用户在 Worker 类路径上收到的字节内容，从而导致代码在另一个租户的拓扑中执行。 此问题影响那些可能有多个主体（principal）创
获取后续新漏洞提醒
登录后订阅
一、 漏洞 CVE-2026-82428 基础信息
漏洞信息
对漏洞内容有疑问？看看神龙的深度分析是否有帮助！
查看神龙十问 ↗
尽管我们使用了先进的大模型技术，但其输出仍可能包含不准确或过时的信息。神龙努力确保数据的准确性，但请您根据实际情况进行核实和判断。
Vulnerability Title
Apache Storm Client: Cross-Tenant Dependency Jar Substitution via Predictable Blob Keys
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Description
Description
Dependency artifacts uploaded with `storm jar --artifacts` were stored under a blob key derived only from
the Maven coordinate, for example `dep---.jar`. The key was therefore identical
for every user of the cluster and predictable in advance. When the blob already existed, the uploader
caught `KeyAlreadyExistsException` and silently reused it, with no check that the existing blob's content
or owner matched the artifact the submitter had resolved.
A user who uploaded a blob under such a key first therefore controlled the bytes that every later submitter
of the same coordinate would receive on the worker classpath, resulting in code execution inside another
tenant's topology.
This affects deployments where more than one principal may create blobs and where the `--artifacts`
dependency feature is used.
Mitigation
Upgrade to 3.1.0, where each uploaded artifact receives a key carrying a freshly generated UUID and a
pre-existing blob is no longer silently reused.
Note that the corrected key generation is on the SUBMITTING CLIENT, so upgrading the cluster alone does not
close this; every client that runs `storm jar --artifacts` must also be upgraded. Operators should audit
existing `dep-` blobs for unexpected owners before upgrading. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should
avoid the `--artifacts` mechanism in multi-tenant clusters and distribute dependencies inside the topology
jar instead.
Credit
The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
CVSS Information
N/A
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
Vulnerability Type
对路径名的限制不恰当(路径遍历)
来源: CVE Program / CVE List V5
受影响产品
| 厂商 | 产品 | 影响版本 | CPE | 订阅 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation | Apache Storm Client | 3.0.0 ~ 3.1.0 | - |
|
二、漏洞 CVE-2026-82428 的公开POC
| # | POC 描述 | 源链接 | 神龙链接 |
|---|
AI 生成 POC
高级
未找到公开 POC。
登录以生成 AI POC三、漏洞 CVE-2026-82428 的情报信息
请登录查看更多情报信息。
CVE-2026-82428 其他参考 (1)
同批安全公告 · Apache Software Foundation · 2026-09-14 · 共 39 条
| CVE-2026-82434 | 10.0 CRITICAL | Apache Storm 向只读用户及日志泄露ZK凭证 |
| CVE-2026-78330 | Apache Syncope 管理员JWT权限提升漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-73579 | Apache Syncope 非递归Any搜索绕过Realm限制 | |
| CVE-2026-75015 | Apache Syncope 嵌套密钥泄露明文的审计记录 | |
| CVE-2026-75030 | Apache Syncope 组成员权限检查不完整漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-77051 | Apache Syncope SQL注入漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-73668 | Apache Syncope 机密ConnId配置跨域泄露 | |
| CVE-2026-77147 | Apache Syncope Groovy沙箱逃逸漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-77181 | Apache Syncope 客户端应用更新权限失效 | |
| CVE-2026-77883 | Apache Syncope JEXL导航致信息泄露 | |
| CVE-2026-78318 | Apache Syncope 控制台反射型XSS漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-73470 | Apache Syncope 非所有者角色授权越权漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-78336 | Apache Syncope OIDC提供者列表信息泄露漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-82232 | Apache Syncope 任务搜索SQL注入 | |
| CVE-2026-86460 | Apache Syncope FIQL查询Cypher注入漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-87779 | Apache Syncope AES密钥泄露 | |
| CVE-2026-87785 | Apache Syncope JWT主体欺骗漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-87802 | Apache Syncope 远程代码执行漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-68570 | Apache Doris 授权绕过导致未授权数据访问漏洞 | |
| CVE-2026-72524 | Apache Doris 授权绕过导致任意表读写删 |
显示前 20 条，共 39 条。 查看全部 → →
IV. Related Vulnerabilities
V. Comments for CVE-2026-82428
暂无评论