以下是该漏洞描述的中文翻译: 输入中指定数量校验不当 ash-project 中的 ash 库存在“输入中指定数量校验不当”的漏洞。攻击者可以提交一个非有限的小数(Decimal)值,从而绕过数值边界约束,或者导致后续对该值的操作失败。 详细分析: 通过 Ecto 的小数类型转换函数 和 (位于 )对输入进行转换,但在转换后未检查生成的数值是否为有限值。由于 Elixir 的 Decimal 类型将“无穷大”(Infinity)和“非数值”(NaN)视为有效的结构体,因此诸如 或 这样的值在通过转换检查后被持久化存
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash | 1.28.0 ~ 3.32.2 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| ash-project | ash | db6bdfcf1518c70d67975efb140cdeb2cb6a76e7 ~ 818087b1b3364f2af6f5460d6b01262ad0f69204 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-74837 | 8.7 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from client-supplied RPC field names in AshTypescript field format |
| CVE-2026-77856 | 8.2 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from typed struct field names in AshTypescript field selector |
| CVE-2026-82730 | 8.2 HIGH | Authorization-redacted field values disclosed through AshTypescript result normalization |
| CVE-2026-77950 | 6.3 MEDIUM | RPC error handler fails open in AshTypescript, disclosing unredacted errors |
| CVE-2026-82732 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Declared argument constraints not enforced on AshTypescript typed controller routes |
| CVE-2026-82733 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Route handler return value echoed into AshTypescript error response |
| CVE-2026-82738 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Type.UUIDv7 accepts non-v7 UUIDs that then fail to load, causing persistent denial of |
| CVE-2026-82735 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Match regex runs on over-length input in Ash.Type.String, enabling regex denial of service |
| CVE-2026-82737 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Vector wraps the 16-bit dimension header for vectors over 65,535 elements, corrupting |
| CVE-2026-82747 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Policy.Authorizer returns records denied by a runtime read policy to any actor |
| CVE-2026-82742 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Filter.Runtime materializes a combinatorial cross-product over to-many relationships, |
| CVE-2026-82745 | 5.9 MEDIUM | ETS and Mnesia data layers overwrite an existing record on create instead of enforcing pri |
| CVE-2026-82746 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.update_many/4 atomic path skips resource policy authorization, allowing updates to for |
| CVE-2026-82749 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash relationship parent(...) filter degrades to an IS NULL match when the parent field is |
| CVE-2026-82731 | 2.3 LOW | Unescaped path parameters in AshTypescript generated TypeScript client allow request redir |
| CVE-2026-82739 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Resource.Validation.Confirm leaks a confirmed field's stored value in the atomic misma |
| CVE-2026-82740 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type ignores outer array constraints on nested {:array, {:array, type}} inputs |
| CVE-2026-82741 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.Union with :map_with_tag does not force the tag on dump, enabling tag confusion |
| CVE-2026-82736 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.CiString validates length and match constraints before case folding, allowing con |
| CVE-2026-82743 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Actions.Read.AsyncLimiter busy-spins a scheduler while awaiting slow async reads |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →
No comments yet