以下是该漏洞描述信息的中文翻译: ash 项目中存在缺失授权(Missing Authorization)漏洞 该漏洞存在于 ash 框架中,允许调用者通过 的原子执行路径,更新那些被资源策略(resource policies)禁止操作的记录。 当使用了原子策略且数据层支持时, 会作为单个原子语句执行(例如数据层的 ,如 SQL 的 语句)。然而, (位于 )在设置 的情况下依然选择了原子路径,却未应用资源的策略,导致该语句会根据主键匹配到所有行并进行更新,完全忽略了授权本应施加的策略过滤器。因此,调用者可以更新
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash | 3.29.0 ~ 3.32.2 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| ash-project | ash | 45e6b4ec7b2dc076afe614aa7aef7e1f15b5e335 ~ ed4e656822ffe83f8e960d5de0b573c0d1ae7f29 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-74837 | 8.7 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from client-supplied RPC field names in AshTypescript field format |
| CVE-2026-77856 | 8.2 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from typed struct field names in AshTypescript field selector |
| CVE-2026-82730 | 8.2 HIGH | Authorization-redacted field values disclosed through AshTypescript result normalization |
| CVE-2026-77950 | 6.3 MEDIUM | RPC error handler fails open in AshTypescript, disclosing unredacted errors |
| CVE-2026-82732 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Declared argument constraints not enforced on AshTypescript typed controller routes |
| CVE-2026-82733 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Route handler return value echoed into AshTypescript error response |
| CVE-2026-82737 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Vector wraps the 16-bit dimension header for vectors over 65,535 elements, corrupting |
| CVE-2026-82735 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Match regex runs on over-length input in Ash.Type.String, enabling regex denial of service |
| CVE-2026-82747 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Policy.Authorizer returns records denied by a runtime read policy to any actor |
| CVE-2026-82738 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Type.UUIDv7 accepts non-v7 UUIDs that then fail to load, causing persistent denial of |
| CVE-2026-82742 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Filter.Runtime materializes a combinatorial cross-product over to-many relationships, |
| CVE-2026-82745 | 5.9 MEDIUM | ETS and Mnesia data layers overwrite an existing record on create instead of enforcing pri |
| CVE-2026-82749 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash relationship parent(...) filter degrades to an IS NULL match when the parent field is |
| CVE-2026-82731 | 2.3 LOW | Unescaped path parameters in AshTypescript generated TypeScript client allow request redir |
| CVE-2026-82739 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Resource.Validation.Confirm leaks a confirmed field's stored value in the atomic misma |
| CVE-2026-82740 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type ignores outer array constraints on nested {:array, {:array, type}} inputs |
| CVE-2026-82736 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.CiString validates length and match constraints before case folding, allowing con |
| CVE-2026-82741 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.Union with :map_with_tag does not force the tag on dump, enabling tag confusion |
| CVE-2026-82734 | 2.1 LOW | Non-finite Infinity/NaN decimal values bypass bounds constraints in Ash.Type.Decimal |
| CVE-2026-82743 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Actions.Read.AsyncLimiter busy-spins a scheduler while awaiting slow async reads |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →
No comments yet