ash-project ash 中存在一个“错误授权”漏洞:当资源配置了 读取策略(该策略针对每条记录进行评估,而非编译为过滤器)时, 在 (位于 )中决定每条记录的授权状态。其方式是先排除“不可能”的策略场景,然后检查剩余部分。当某条记录的所有策略场景都被判定为“不可能”——即没有任何策略可以授权该记录,因此应当被禁止访问时,代码中“空场景”分支错误地保留了该记录( ),并将其返回为“已授权”。结果就是:那些本应被运行时读取策略拒绝的记录,被返回给了任意操作者。 修复方案:当某条记录的所有策略场景均为“不可能”时
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash | 3.4.44 ~ 3.32.2 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| ash-project | ash | f4a8ff53fd3b974468d73685cd3fc842ef893de3 ~ 6eddb8ab26e45023faf0c79ebd152bb40aefda02 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-74837 | 8.7 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from client-supplied RPC field names in AshTypescript field format |
| CVE-2026-77856 | 8.2 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from typed struct field names in AshTypescript field selector |
| CVE-2026-82730 | 8.2 HIGH | Authorization-redacted field values disclosed through AshTypescript result normalization |
| CVE-2026-77950 | 6.3 MEDIUM | RPC error handler fails open in AshTypescript, disclosing unredacted errors |
| CVE-2026-82732 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Declared argument constraints not enforced on AshTypescript typed controller routes |
| CVE-2026-82733 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Route handler return value echoed into AshTypescript error response |
| CVE-2026-82737 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Vector wraps the 16-bit dimension header for vectors over 65,535 elements, corrupting |
| CVE-2026-82735 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Match regex runs on over-length input in Ash.Type.String, enabling regex denial of service |
| CVE-2026-82749 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash relationship parent(...) filter degrades to an IS NULL match when the parent field is |
| CVE-2026-82738 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Type.UUIDv7 accepts non-v7 UUIDs that then fail to load, causing persistent denial of |
| CVE-2026-82742 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Filter.Runtime materializes a combinatorial cross-product over to-many relationships, |
| CVE-2026-82745 | 5.9 MEDIUM | ETS and Mnesia data layers overwrite an existing record on create instead of enforcing pri |
| CVE-2026-82746 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.update_many/4 atomic path skips resource policy authorization, allowing updates to for |
| CVE-2026-82731 | 2.3 LOW | Unescaped path parameters in AshTypescript generated TypeScript client allow request redir |
| CVE-2026-82739 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Resource.Validation.Confirm leaks a confirmed field's stored value in the atomic misma |
| CVE-2026-82740 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type ignores outer array constraints on nested {:array, {:array, type}} inputs |
| CVE-2026-82736 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.CiString validates length and match constraints before case folding, allowing con |
| CVE-2026-82741 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.Union with :map_with_tag does not force the tag on dump, enabling tag confusion |
| CVE-2026-82734 | 2.1 LOW | Non-finite Infinity/NaN decimal values bypass bounds constraints in Ash.Type.Decimal |
| CVE-2026-82743 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Actions.Read.AsyncLimiter busy-spins a scheduler while awaiting slow async reads |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →
No comments yet