ash 项目中的授权不正确漏洞 ash 中的“授权不正确”漏洞在于:系统在计算聚合值时,针对某一个读操作(read action)进行授权,但在实际执行时却使用了另一个操作。这导致聚合查询可能在与其授权时所用的操作不匹配的政策下运行。 具体机制如下: 根据 对聚合进行分组,并对每组在其对应的 下完成授权。但在构建数据查询时,系统选择使用的操作是 (见 )。当调用方显式传入 选项时,聚合查询实际是在该操作下执行的,而授权却是基于该分组自身的 计算的。如果被执行的操作的读政策比被授权操作的读政策更为宽松,那么聚合结果(
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| Vendor | Product | Affected Versions | CPE | Subscribe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ash-project | ash | 3.5.13 ~ 3.32.2 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| ash-project | ash | d2e99980380cad610dbab3c4167e85323244bc71 ~ 2d9b78b87d2dc72885a8aa1d660b478d42f749f7 |
cpe:2.3:a:ash-project:ash:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
|
|
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-74837 | 8.7 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from client-supplied RPC field names in AshTypescript field format |
| CVE-2026-77856 | 8.2 HIGH | Unbounded atom creation from typed struct field names in AshTypescript field selector |
| CVE-2026-82730 | 8.2 HIGH | Authorization-redacted field values disclosed through AshTypescript result normalization |
| CVE-2026-77950 | 6.3 MEDIUM | RPC error handler fails open in AshTypescript, disclosing unredacted errors |
| CVE-2026-82732 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Declared argument constraints not enforced on AshTypescript typed controller routes |
| CVE-2026-82733 | 6.3 MEDIUM | Route handler return value echoed into AshTypescript error response |
| CVE-2026-82737 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Vector wraps the 16-bit dimension header for vectors over 65,535 elements, corrupting |
| CVE-2026-82735 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Match regex runs on over-length input in Ash.Type.String, enabling regex denial of service |
| CVE-2026-82747 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Policy.Authorizer returns records denied by a runtime read policy to any actor |
| CVE-2026-82738 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Type.UUIDv7 accepts non-v7 UUIDs that then fail to load, causing persistent denial of |
| CVE-2026-82742 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.Filter.Runtime materializes a combinatorial cross-product over to-many relationships, |
| CVE-2026-82745 | 5.9 MEDIUM | ETS and Mnesia data layers overwrite an existing record on create instead of enforcing pri |
| CVE-2026-82746 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash.update_many/4 atomic path skips resource policy authorization, allowing updates to for |
| CVE-2026-82749 | 5.9 MEDIUM | Ash relationship parent(...) filter degrades to an IS NULL match when the parent field is |
| CVE-2026-82731 | 2.3 LOW | Unescaped path parameters in AshTypescript generated TypeScript client allow request redir |
| CVE-2026-82739 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Resource.Validation.Confirm leaks a confirmed field's stored value in the atomic misma |
| CVE-2026-82740 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type ignores outer array constraints on nested {:array, {:array, type}} inputs |
| CVE-2026-82736 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.CiString validates length and match constraints before case folding, allowing con |
| CVE-2026-82741 | 2.1 LOW | Ash.Type.Union with :map_with_tag does not force the tag on dump, enabling tag confusion |
| CVE-2026-82734 | 2.1 LOW | Non-finite Infinity/NaN decimal values bypass bounds constraints in Ash.Type.Decimal |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →
No comments yet