将 设置为 时,并不会如预期和文档所述那样禁用 SigV4 认证。在同一个句柄上进行的后续传输仍会向随后设置的任何 URL 发送 请求头,从而导致状态信息泄露。
Although we use advanced large model technology, its output may still contain inaccurate or outdated information.Shenlong tries to ensure data accuracy, but please verify and judge based on the actual situation.
| # | POC Description | Source Link | Shenlong Link |
|---|
No public POC found.
Login to generate AI POC| CVE-2026-92389 | TFTP direction confusion | |
| CVE-2026-107928 | info leak uploading over WebSockets with GnuTLS | |
| CVE-2026-107929 | local interface connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-94266 | password leak in CURLINFO_EFFECTIVE_URL | |
| CVE-2026-94265 | Authorization: Negotiate sent to foreign origin | |
| CVE-2026-86415 | auto client cert connection reuse mixup | |
| CVE-2026-86414 | leaking host credentials to HTTP proxy | |
| CVE-2026-92390 | -J no-clobber guarantee bypassed with 103 early hints | |
| CVE-2026-92387 | never-ending loop via server response omission | |
| CVE-2026-92388 | FTP wildcard write callback mixup | |
| CVE-2026-92386 | server-set cookie aborts cookie jar load | |
| CVE-2026-86413 | Negotiate credentials sent to redirected origin | |
| CVE-2026-92391 | curl_mime_free stack overflow by recursion | |
| CVE-2026-87865 | knownhost callback mismatches key as missing | |
| CVE-2026-87864 | IMAP APPEND plus CRLF conversion command injection | |
| CVE-2026-87863 | HSTS response erases persisted entries | |
| CVE-2026-87866 | wolfSSL public-key pinning bypass | |
| CVE-2026-87861 | cross-origin reuse of a Negotiate connection | |
| CVE-2026-87862 | HSTS cache import drops longer-lived child | |
| CVE-2026-86411 | FTP connection reuse inherits client-certificate |
Showing top 20 of 23 CVEs. View all on vendor page → →